VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Thomas Soares Mullen
dblp:382/3893
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Representation and self-supervised learning · 77% Reinforcement learning · 23% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › latent representation learning › state representation learning
latent dynamics model |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Learning interpretable control inputs and dynamics underlying animal locomotion · ICLR 2024 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
computational neuroscience |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Learning interpretable control inputs and dynamics underlying animal locomotion · ICLR 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
system identification · 1.5recurrent neural network · 1.5balanced model reduction · 1.5
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Learning interpretable control inputs and dynamics underlying animal locomotionabstractA central objective in neuroscience is to understand how the brain orchestrates movement. Recent advances in automated tracking technologies have made it possible to document behavior with unprecedented temporal resolution and scale, generating rich datasets which can be exploited to gain insights into the neural control of movement. One common approach is to identify stereotypical motor primitives using cluster analysis. However, this categorical description can limit our ability to model the effect of more continuous control schemes. Here we take a control theoretic approach to behavioral modeling and argue that movements can be understood as the output of a controlled dynamical system. Previously, models of movement dynamics, trained solely on behavioral data, have been effective in reproducing observed features of neural activity. These models addressed specific scenarios where animals were trained to execute particular movements upon receiving a prompt. In this study, we extend this approach to analyze the full natural locomotor repertoire of an animal: the zebrafish larva. Our findings demonstrate that this repertoire can be effectively generated through a sparse control signal driving a latent Recurrent Neural Network (RNN). Our model's learned latent space preserves key kinematic features and disentangles different categories of movements. To further interpret the latent dynamics, we used balanced model reduction to yield a simplified model. Collectively, our methods serve as a case study for interpretable system identification, and offer a novel framework for understanding neural activity in relation to movement. Thomas Soares Mullen, Marine Schimel, Guillaume Hennequin, Christian K. Machens, Michael B. Orger, Adrien Jouary |
ICLR | 1 |