Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Chunxuan Xia
dblp:382/8140
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
0009-0003-8038-6897ORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Recommender systems · 56% Information retrieval · 44% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Recommender systems › interactive recommendation
conversational recommendation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Search-Based Interaction For Conversation Recommendation via Generative Reward Model Based Simulated User · SIGIR 2025 |
Information retrieval › evaluation › user simulation
user simulator |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Search-Based Interaction For Conversation Recommendation via Generative Reward Model Based Simulated User · SIGIR 2025 |
Recommender systems
knowledge-aware recommendation |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Search-Based Interaction For Conversation Recommendation via Generative Reward Model Based Simulated User · SIGIR 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
prompt learning · 0.9large language model · 0.9knowledge graph · 0.9instruction tuning · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Search-Based Interaction For Conversation Recommendation via Generative Reward Model Based Simulated UserabstractConversational recommendation systems (CRSs) use multi-turn interaction to capture user preferences and provide personalized recommendations. A fundamental challenge in CRSs lies in effectively understanding user preferences from conversations. Previous research primarily focuses on the issue of insufficient contextual information in conversations. They address this by introducing external knowledge sources, such as knowledge graphs, large language models (LLMs), and conversational recommendation corpora. Based on this, they design specific alignment strategies (e.g., prompt learning and instruction tuning) to integrate such knowledge for user preference understanding and item recommendation. However, user preferences can be multifaceted and complex, posing significant challenges for accurate recommendations even with access to abundant external knowledge. While interaction with users can clarify their true preferences, frequent user involvement may lead to a degraded user experience. Xiaolei Wang 0005, Chunxuan Xia, Junyi Li 0001, Fanzhe Meng, Jinpeng Wang 0001, Wayne Xin Zhao, Ji-Rong Wen |
SIGIR | 2 |