Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Chunxuan Xia

dblp:382/8140 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
0009-0003-8038-6897ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Recommender systems · 56% Information retrieval · 44%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Recommender systems › interactive recommendation
conversational recommendation
0.912025
Search-Based Interaction For Conversation Recommendation via Generative Reward Model Based Simulated User · SIGIR 2025
Information retrieval › evaluation › user simulation
user simulator
0.912025
Search-Based Interaction For Conversation Recommendation via Generative Reward Model Based Simulated User · SIGIR 2025
Recommender systems
knowledge-aware recommendation
0.312025
Search-Based Interaction For Conversation Recommendation via Generative Reward Model Based Simulated User · SIGIR 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

prompt learning · 0.9large language model · 0.9knowledge graph · 0.9instruction tuning · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Search-Based Interaction For Conversation Recommendation via Generative Reward Model Based Simulated User
abstract
Conversational recommendation systems (CRSs) use multi-turn interaction to capture user preferences and provide personalized recommendations. A fundamental challenge in CRSs lies in effectively understanding user preferences from conversations. Previous research primarily focuses on the issue of insufficient contextual information in conversations. They address this by introducing external knowledge sources, such as knowledge graphs, large language models (LLMs), and conversational recommendation corpora. Based on this, they design specific alignment strategies (e.g., prompt learning and instruction tuning) to integrate such knowledge for user preference understanding and item recommendation. However, user preferences can be multifaceted and complex, posing significant challenges for accurate recommendations even with access to abundant external knowledge. While interaction with users can clarify their true preferences, frequent user involvement may lead to a degraded user experience.
Xiaolei Wang 0005, Chunxuan Xia, Junyi Li 0001, Fanzhe Meng, Jinpeng Wang 0001, Wayne Xin Zhao, Ji-Rong Wen
SIGIR2