Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Brian Cheong
dblp:382/8641
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
2as first author
3since 2021 · last 2026
0009-0000-4110-6504ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 3 · 2 first-author · 3 since 2021Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Autonomous driving · 60% 3D vision · 21% Video understanding and tracking · 18% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computer vision › 3D vision
3d object detection |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | ForeSight: Multi-View Streaming Joint Object Detection and Trajectory Forecasting · ICCV 2025 |
Robotics › Autonomous driving
perception and prediction |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | ForeSight: Multi-View Streaming Joint Object Detection and Trajectory Forecasting · ICCV 2025 |
Robotics › Autonomous driving
trajectory prediction |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | ForeSight: Multi-View Streaming Joint Object Detection and Trajectory Forecasting · ICCV 2025 |
Computer vision › Video understanding and tracking › object tracking › 3d object tracking
LiDAR-based tracking |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | JDT3D: Addressing the Gaps in LiDAR-Based Tracking-by-Attention · ECCV (66) 2024 |
Robotics › Autonomous driving
perception |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | JDT3D: Addressing the Gaps in LiDAR-Based Tracking-by-Attention · ECCV (66) 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
transformer · 0.9streaming memory · 0.9multi-task learning · 0.9tracking by attention · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | SCATR: Mitigating New Instance Suppression in LiDAR-based Tracking-by-Attention via Second Chance Assignment and Track Query DropoutabstractLiDAR-based tracking-by-attention (TBA) frameworks inherently suffer from high false negative errors, leading to a significant performance gap compared to traditional LiDAR-based tracking-by-detection (TBD) methods. This paper introduces SCATR, a novel LiDAR-based TBA model designed to address this fundamental challenge systematically. SCATR leverages recent progress in vision-based tracking and incorporates targeted training strategies specifically adapted for LiDAR. Our work’s core innovations are two architecture-agnostic training strategies for TBA methods: Second Chance Assignment and Track Query Dropout. Second Chance Assignment is a novel ground truth assignment that concatenates unassigned track queries to the proposal queries before bipartite matching, giving these track queries a second chance to be assigned to a ground truth object and effectively mitigating the conflict between detection and tracking tasks inherent in tracking-by-attention. Track Query Dropout is a training method that diversifies supervised object query configurations to efficiently train the decoder to handle different track query sets, enhancing robustness to missing or newborn tracks. Experiments on the nuScenes tracking benchmark demonstrate that SCATR achieves state-of-the-art performance among LiDAR-based TBA methods, outperforming previous works by 7.6% AMOTA and successfully bridging the long-standing performance gap between LiDAR-based TBA and TBD methods. Ablation studies further validate the effectiveness and generalization of Second Chance Assignment and Track Query Dropout. Code can be found at the following link: https://github.com/TRAILab/SCATR Brian Cheong, Sandro Papais, Steven Lake Waslander |
WACV | 1 |
| 2025 | ForeSight: Multi-View Streaming Joint Object Detection and Trajectory ForecastingabstractWe introduce ForeSight, a novel joint detection and forecasting framework for vision-based 3D perception in autonomous vehicles. Traditional approaches treat detection and forecasting as separate sequential tasks, limiting their ability to leverage temporal cues. ForeSight addresses this limitation with a multi-task streaming and bidirectional learning approach, allowing detection and forecasting to share query memory and propagate information seamlessly. The forecast-aware detection transformer enhances spatial reasoning by integrating trajectory predictions from a multiple hypothesis forecast memory queue, while the streaming forecast transformer improves temporal consistency using past forecasts and refined detections. Unlike tracking-based methods, ForeSight eliminates the need for explicit object association, reducing error propagation with a tracking-free model that efficiently scales across multi-frame sequences. Experiments on the nuScenes dataset show that ForeSight achieves state-of-the-art performance, achieving an EPA of 54.9%, surpassing previous methods by 9.3%, while also attaining the best mAP and minADE among multi-view detection and forecasting models. Sandro Papais, Brian Cheong, Steven Lake Waslander |
ICCV | 3 |
| 2024 | JDT3D: Addressing the Gaps in LiDAR-Based Tracking-by-Attention
Brian Cheong, Jiachen Zhou 0002, Steven Lake Waslander |
ECCV (66) | 1 |