Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Mingyu Jeon

dblp:382/9883 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · unresolved

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Vision and language · 50% Trustworthy machine learning · 33% Transfer learning and domain adaptation · 17%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computer vision › Vision and language
cross-modal alignment
1.012026
GranAlign: Granularity-Aware Alignment Framework for Zero-shot Video Moment Retrieval · AAAI 2026
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
fairness
1.012026
Selective Test-Time Debiasing for CLIP via Reward Gating · ACL (1) 2026
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
test-time adaptation
1.012026
Selective Test-Time Debiasing for CLIP via Reward Gating · ACL (1) 2026
Computer vision › Vision and language › moment retrieval
video moment retrieval
1.012026
GranAlign: Granularity-Aware Alignment Framework for Zero-shot Video Moment Retrieval · AAAI 2026
Computer vision › Vision and language
vision-language model
1.012026
Selective Test-Time Debiasing for CLIP via Reward Gating · ACL (1) 2026
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › fairness › bias mitigation
vision-language model debiasing
1.012026
Selective Test-Time Debiasing for CLIP via Reward Gating · ACL (1) 2026

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

test-time adaptation · 1.0reinforcement learning · 1.0query rewriting · 1.0pre-trained vision-language model · 1.0caption generation · 1.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 GranAlign: Granularity-Aware Alignment Framework for Zero-shot Video Moment Retrieval
abstract
Zero-shot video moment retrieval (ZVMR) is the task of localizing a temporal moment within an untrimmed video using a natural language query without relying on task-specific training data. The primary challenge in this setting lies in the mismatch in semantic granularity between textual queries and visual content. Previous studies in ZVMR have attempted to achieve alignment by leveraging high-quality pre-trained knowledge that represents video and language in a joint space. However, these approaches failed to balance the semantic granularity between the pre-trained knowledge provided by each modality for a given scene. As a result, despite the high quality of each modality’s representations, the mismatch in granularity led to inaccurate retrieval. In this paper, we propose a training-free framework, called Granularity-Aware Alignment (GranAlign), that bridges this gap between coarse and fine semantic representations. Our approach introduces two complementary techniques: granularity-based query rewriting to generate varied semantic granularities, and query-aware caption generation to embed query intent into video content. By pairing multi-level queries with both query-agnostic and query-aware captions, we effectively resolve semantic mismatches. As a result, our method sets a new state-of-the-art across all three major benchmarks (QVHighlights, Charades-STA, ActivityNet-Captions), with a notable 3.23% mAP@avg improvement on the QVHighlights dataset.
Mingyu Jeon, Sunjae Yoon, Jonghee Kim, Junyeong Kim
AAAI1
2026 Selective Test-Time Debiasing for CLIP via Reward Gating
abstract
Vision language models (VLMs) demonstrate strong zero-shot performance, but often perpetuate social stereotypes in person-centric queries, yielding skewed demographic distributions.Current debiasing methods apply uniform bias corrections across all input queries regardless of their bias sensitivity, creating a fundamental fairness-utility trade-off.Strong debiasing distorts semantically meaningful information in bias-insensitive queries, while weak debiasing fails to mitigate stereotypes in biassensitive ones.This one-size-fits-all approach hampers simultaneously achieving high utility on bias-insensitive queries and fairness on bias-sensitive queries.We introduce Reward-Gated Test-Time Adaptation (RG-TTA), a reinforcement learning-based test-time adaptation framework that selectively applies debiasing based on input sensitivity.RG-TTA adaptively triggers fairness regularization based on the bias sensitivity of each input during testtime policy adaptation, while focusing exclusively on optimizing cross-modal alignment for bias-insensitive inputs.Experiments on fairness benchmarks (e.g., FairFace, UTKFace) demonstrate substantial bias reduction while simultaneously improving zero-shot utility, resolving the trade-off of uniform debiasing.
Jaeho Han, Jisoo Yang, Hyeondong Woo, Mingyu Jeon, Sunjae Yoon, Junyeong Kim
ACL (1)4