Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Yuqi Chen 0028

dblp:383/2147 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
0009-0007-9521-3154ORCID · verified

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Data mining · 50% Information retrieval · 50%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Approximation and online algorithms · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Information retrieval › text summarization
comparative summarization
0.912025
Top-K Representative Search for Comparative Tree Summarization · IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2025
Data mining › data reduction
data summarization
0.912025
Top-K Representative Search for Comparative Tree Summarization · IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2025
Approximation and online algorithms › approximation algorithms › combinatorial approximation algorithms
greedy approximation
0.312025
Top-K Representative Search for Comparative Tree Summarization · IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

hellinger distance · 1.7greedy algorithm · 1.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Top-K Representative Search for Comparative Tree Summarization
abstract
Data summarization aims at utilizing a small-scale summary to represent massive datasets as a whole, which is useful for visualization and information sipped generation. However, most existing studies of hierarchical summarization only work onone single treeby selecting$k$representative nodes, which neglects an important problem of comparative summarization on two trees. In this paper, given two trees with the same topology structure and different node weights, we aim at finding$k$representative nodes, where$k_{1}$nodes summarize the common relationship between them and$k_{2}$nodes highlight significantly different subtrees meanwhile satisfying$k_{1}+k_{2}=k$. To optimize summarization results, we introduce a scaling coefficient for balancing the summary view between two subtrees in terms of similarity and difference. Additionally, we propose a novel definition based on the Hellinger distance to quantify the node distribution difference between two subtrees. We present a greedy algorithm SVDT to find high-quality results with approximation guaranteed in an efficient way. Furthermore, we explore an extension of our comparative summarization to handle two trees with different structures. Extensive experiments demonstrate the effectiveness and efficiency of our SVDT algorithm against existing summarization competitors.
Yuqi Chen 0028, Xin Huang 0001, Bilian Chen
IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng.1