Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Jai Bardhan

dblp:383/4235 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Trustworthy machine learning · 70% Vision and language · 23% Multi-agent systems · 7%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
calibration
1.012026
Refine and Align: Confidence Calibration Through Multi-Agent Interaction in VQA · AAAI 2026
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › calibration
confidence calibration
1.012026
Refine and Align: Confidence Calibration Through Multi-Agent Interaction in VQA · AAAI 2026
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
uncertainty estimation
1.012026
Refine and Align: Confidence Calibration Through Multi-Agent Interaction in VQA · AAAI 2026
Computer vision › Vision and language
visual question answering
1.012026
Refine and Align: Confidence Calibration Through Multi-Agent Interaction in VQA · AAAI 2026
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Multi-agent systems › LLM-based multi-agent systems
multi-agent debate
0.312026
Refine and Align: Confidence Calibration Through Multi-Agent Interaction in VQA · AAAI 2026

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

multi-agent debate · 1.0fine-tuning · 1.0calibration-aware loss · 1.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Refine and Align: Confidence Calibration Through Multi-Agent Interaction in VQA
abstract
In the context of Visual Question Answering (VQA) and Agentic AI, calibration refers to how closely an AI system's confidence in its answers reflects their actual correctness. This aspect becomes especially important when such systems operate autonomously and must make decisions under visual uncertainty. While modern VQA systems, powered by advanced vision-language models (VLMs), are increasingly used in high-stakes domains like medical diagnostics and autonomous navigation due to their improved accuracy, the reliability of their confidence estimates remains under-examined. Particularly, these systems often produce overconfident responses. To address this, we introduce AlignVQA, a debate-based multi-agent framework, in which diverse specialized VLM -- each following distinct prompting strategies -- generate candidate answers and then engage in two-stage interaction: generalist agents critique, refine and aggregate these proposals. This debate process yields confidence estimates that more accurately reflect the model’s true predictive performance. We find that more calibrated specialized agents produce better aligned confidences. Furthermore, we introduce a novel differentiable calibration-aware loss function called AlignCal designed to fine-tune the specialized agents by minimizing an upper bound on the calibration error. This objective explicitly improves the fidelity of each agent’s confidence estimates. Empirical results across multiple benchmark VQA datasets substantiate the efficacy of our approach, demonstrating substantial reductions in calibration discrepancies.
Jai Bardhan, Ishita Jain, Ramya Hebbalaguppe, Rohan Raju Dhanakshirur, Lovekesh Vig
AAAI2
2026 Curve Skeletonization in Continuous domain for Meshes and Point Clouds
abstract
Advancements in 3D curve skeletonization are accelerating progress across a wide range of applications. However, developing robust skeletonization algorithms that capture intricate object details remains challenging. Skeletonization via Local Separators (LS) offers an efficient graph-based approach but suffers from representation inaccuracies due to its discrete nature. To address this, we introduce CSCD, a novel framework for Curve Skeletonization in the Continuous Domain, generalizing LS to manifolds. Specifically, we present two realizations: CSCD-M for meshes and CSCD-PC for point clouds. CSCD-M leverages the intrinsic triangulation of a mesh for resilience to noise and improved topological preservation, while CSCD-PC employs tufted Laplacians for enhanced robustness. To our knowledge, CSCD-M is the first intrinsic method for curve skeletonization. Our results show CSCD-M matches LS performance across diverse meshes and outperforms LS (TOG’21) on benchmarks like Thingi10k dataset. CSCD-PC qualitatively outperforms CoverageAxis++ (Eurographics’24) and EPCS (CAG’23). Finally, we demonstrate the efficacy of CSCD in a few downstream tasks: object classification, shape segmentation, identifying handles, tunnels, and constrictions in objects.Project Website: https://cscd-skel.pages.dev
Jai Bardhan, Ramya Hebbalaguppe, Aravind Udupa
WACV1