Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Hiromasa Sakurai

dblp:383/6353 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Question answering and dialogue systems · 70% Language models and text generation · 30%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems
dialogue understanding
0.812024
Evaluating Intention Detection Capability of Large Language Models in Persuasive Dialogues · ACL (1) 2024
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems
intention detection
0.812024
Evaluating Intention Detection Capability of Large Language Models in Persuasive Dialogues · ACL (1) 2024
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
large language model evaluation
0.812024
Evaluating Intention Detection Capability of Large Language Models in Persuasive Dialogues · ACL (1) 2024
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems › conversational agents
persuasive dialogue
0.212024
Evaluating Intention Detection Capability of Large Language Models in Persuasive Dialogues · ACL (1) 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

multiple-choice evaluation · 0.8large language model prompting · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Evaluating Intention Detection Capability of Large Language Models in Persuasive Dialogues
abstract
We investigate intention detection in persuasive multi-turn dialogues employing the largest available Large Language Models (LLMs).Much of the prior research measures the intention detection capability of machine learning models without considering the conversational history.To evaluate LLMs' intention detection capability in conversation, we modified the existing datasets of persuasive conversation and created datasets using a multiplechoice paradigm.1 It is crucial to consider others' perspectives through their utterances when engaging in a persuasive conversation, especially when making a request or reply that is inconvenient for others.This feature makes the persuasive dialogue suitable for the dataset of measuring intention detection capability.We incorporate the concept of face acts, which categorize how utterances affect mental states.This approach enables us to measure intention detection capability by focusing on crucial intentions and to conduct comprehensible analysis according to intention types.
Hiromasa Sakurai, Yusuke Miyao
ACL (1)1