Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Haojing Huang 0001
dblp:383/6666
· DBLP profile ↗
7ranked-venue papers
1as first author
7since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0002-6299-5467ORCID · verified
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 6 · 6 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
5 papers |
Language models and text generation · 64% Speech recognition and synthesis · 16% Knowledge representation and reasoning · 12% |
Topics — the 10 heaviest of 11, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
mathematical reasoning |
1.7 | 2 | 2025 | Atomic Thinking of LLMs: Decoupling and Exploring Mathematical Reasoning Abilities · NeurIPS 2025 One Example Shown, Many Concepts Known! Counterexample-Driven Conceptual Reasoning in Mathematical LLMs · ICML 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
hallucination mitigation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Refine Knowledge of Large Language Models via Adaptive Contrastive Learning · ICLR 2025 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › knowledge base
knowledge base refinement |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Refine Knowledge of Large Language Models via Adaptive Contrastive Learning · ICLR 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › evaluation of language models › reasoning evaluation
mathematical reasoning evaluation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Atomic Thinking of LLMs: Decoupling and Exploring Mathematical Reasoning Abilities · NeurIPS 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Speech recognition and synthesis › spoken language understanding
multi-intent detection |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | ELSF: Entity-Level Slot Filling Framework for Joint Multiple Intent Detection and Slot Filling · IEEE ACM Trans. Audio Speech Lang. Process. 2024 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
slot filling |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | ELSF: Entity-Level Slot Filling Framework for Joint Multiple Intent Detection and Slot Filling · IEEE ACM Trans. Audio Speech Lang. Process. 2024 |
Natural language and speech › Speech recognition and synthesis
spoken language understanding |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | ELSF: Entity-Level Slot Filling Framework for Joint Multiple Intent Detection and Slot Filling · IEEE ACM Trans. Audio Speech Lang. Process. 2024 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
text correction |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Towards Real-World Writing Assistance: A Chinese Character Checking Benchmark with Faked and Misspelled Characters · ACL (1) 2024 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
large language model evaluation |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | One Example Shown, Many Concepts Known! Counterexample-Driven Conceptual Reasoning in Mathematical LLMs · ICML 2025 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
logic-based reasoning |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Atomic Thinking of LLMs: Decoupling and Exploring Mathematical Reasoning Abilities · NeurIPS 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
supervised fine-tuning · 0.9large language model · 0.9fine-tuning · 0.9data engineering · 0.9adaptive contrastive learning · 0.9multi-task learning · 0.8human annotation · 0.8entity type assignment · 0.8entity boundary detection · 0.8benchmark construction · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Refine Knowledge of Large Language Models via Adaptive Contrastive LearningabstractHow to alleviate the hallucinations of Large Language Models (LLMs) has always been the fundamental goal pursued by the LLMs research community. Looking through numerous hallucination-related studies, a mainstream category of methods is to reduce hallucinations by optimizing the knowledge representation of LLMs to change their output. Considering that the core focus of these works is the knowledge acquired by models, and knowledge has long been a central theme in human societal progress, we believe that the process of models refining knowledge can greatly benefit from the way humans learn. In our work, by imitating the human learning process, we design an Adaptive Contrastive Learning strategy. Our method flexibly constructs different positive and negative samples for contrastive learning based on LLMs' actual mastery of knowledge. This strategy helps LLMs consolidate the correct knowledge they already possess, deepen their understanding of the correct knowledge they have encountered but not fully grasped, forget the incorrect knowledge they previously learned, and honestly acknowledge the knowledge they lack. Extensive experiments and detailed analyses on widely used datasets demonstrate the effectiveness and competitiveness of our method. Haojing Huang 0001, Jiayi Kuang, Yangning Li, Shu-Yu Guo, Chao Qu, Xiaoyu Tan, Hai-Tao Zheng 0002, Ying Shen 0001, Philip S. Yu |
ICLR | 2 |
| 2025 | One Example Shown, Many Concepts Known! Counterexample-Driven Conceptual Reasoning in Mathematical LLMsabstractLeveraging mathematical Large Language Models (LLMs) for proof generation is a fundamental topic in LLMs research. We argue that the ability of current LLMs to prove statements largely depends on whether they have encountered the relevant proof process during training. This reliance limits their deeper understanding of mathematical theorems and related concepts. Inspired by the pedagogical method of "proof by counterexamples" commonly used in human mathematics education, our work aims to enhance LLMs’ ability to conduct mathematical reasoning and proof through counterexamples. Specifically, we manually create a high-quality, university-level mathematical benchmark, COUNTERMATH, which requires LLMs to prove mathematical statements by providing counterexamples, thereby assessing their grasp of mathematical concepts. Additionally, we develop a data engineering framework to automatically obtain training data for further model improvement. Extensive experiments and detailed analyses demonstrate that COUNTERMATH is challenging, indicating that LLMs, such as OpenAI o1, have insufficient counterexample-driven proof capabilities. Moreover, our exploration into model training reveals that strengthening LLMs’ counterexample-driven conceptual reasoning abilities is crucial for improving their overall mathematical capabilities. We believe that our work offers new perspectives on the community of mathematical LLMs. Jiayi Kuang, Haojing Huang 0001, Zhikun Xu, Xinnian Liang, Wenlian Lu, Yangning Li, Xiaoyu Tan, Chao Qu, Ying Shen 0001, Hai-Tao Zheng 0002, Philip S. Yu |
ICML | 3 |
| 2025 | Atomic Thinking of LLMs: Decoupling and Exploring Mathematical Reasoning AbilitiesabstractLarge Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated outstanding performance in mathematical reasoning capabilities. However, we argue that current large-scale reasoning models primarily rely on scaling up training datasets with diverse mathematical problems and long thinking chains, which raises questions about whether LLMs genuinely acquire mathematical concepts and reasoning principles or merely remember the training data. In contrast, humans tend to break down complex problems into multiple fundamental atomic capabilities. Inspired by this, we propose a new paradigm for evaluating mathematical atomic capabilities. Our work categorizes atomic abilities into two dimensions: (1) field-specific abilities across four major mathematical fields, algebra, geometry, analysis, and topology, and (2) logical abilities at different levels, including conceptual understanding, forward multi-step reasoning with formal math language, and counterexample-driven backward reasoning. We propose corresponding training and evaluation datasets for each atomic capability unit, and conduct extensive experiments about how different atomic capabilities influence others, to explore the strategies to elicit the required specific atomic capability. Evaluation and experimental results on advanced models show many interesting discoveries and inspirations about the different performances of models on various atomic capabilities and the interactions between atomic capabilities. Our findings highlight the importance of decoupling mathematical intelligence into atomic components, providing new insights into model cognition and guiding the development of training strategies toward a more efficient, transferable, and cognitively grounded paradigm of "atomic thinking". Jiayi Kuang, Haojing Huang 0001, Xinnian Liang, Zhikun Xu, Yangning Li, Xiaoyu Tan, Chao Qu, Meishan Zhang, Ying Shen 0001, Philip S. Yu |
NeurIPS | 2 |
| 2025 | Correct like humans: Progressive learning framework for Chinese text error correction
Shirong Ma, Shaoshen Chen, Haojing Huang 0001, Shulin Huang, Yangning Li, Hai-Tao Zheng 0002, Ying Shen 0001 |
Expert Syst. Appl. | 4 |
| 2024 | Towards Real-World Writing Assistance: A Chinese Character Checking Benchmark with Faked and Misspelled CharactersabstractYinghui Li, Zishan Xu, Shaoshen Chen, Haojing Huang, Yangning Li, Shirong Ma, Yong Jiang, Zhongli Li, Qingyu Zhou, Hai-Tao Zheng, Ying Shen. Proceedings of the 62nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2024. Zishan Xu, Shaoshen Chen, Haojing Huang 0001, Yangning Li, Shirong Ma, Yong Jiang 0001, Zhongli Li, Qingyu Zhou, Hai-Tao Zheng 0002, Ying Shen 0001 |
ACL (1) | 4 |
| 2024 | ELSF: Entity-Level Slot Filling Framework for Joint Multiple Intent Detection and Slot FillingabstractMulti-intent spoken language understanding (SLU) that can handle multiple intents in an utterance has attracted increasing attention. Previous studies treat the slot filling task as a token-level sequence labeling task, which results in a lack of entity-related information. In our paper, we propose anEntity-LevelSlotFilling (ELSF) framework for joint multiple intent detection and slot filling. In our framework, two entity-oriented auxiliary tasks, entity boundary detection and entity type assignment, are introduced as the regularization to capture the entity boundary and the context of type, respectively. Besides, to better utilize the entity interaction, we design an effective entity-level coordination mechanism for modeling the interaction in both entity-entity and intent-entity relationships. Experiments on five datasets demonstrate the effectiveness and generalizability of our ELSF. Zhanbiao Zhu, Peijie Huang, Haojing Huang 0001, Yuhong Xu, Piyuan Lin, Leyi Lao, Shaoshen Chen, Haojie Xie, Shangjian Yin |
IEEE ACM Trans. Audio Speech Lang. Process. | 3 |
| 2022 | CLID: A Chunk-Level Intent Detection Framework for Multiple Intent Spoken Language UnderstandingabstractMulti-intent spoken language understanding (SLU) that can handle an utterance containing multiple intents is more practical and attracts increasing attention. However, existing state-of-the-art models are either too coarse-grained (Utterance-level) or too fine-grained (Token-level) in intent detection, and thus may fail to recognize the intent transition point and the correct intents in an utterance. In this paper, we propose a Chunk-Level Intent Detection (CLID) framework, where we introduce a sliding window-based self-attention (SWSA) scheme for regional chunk intent detection. Based on the SWSA, an auxiliary task is introduced to identify the intent transition point in an utterance and obtain sub-utterances with a single intent. The intent of each sub-utterance is then predicted by assembling the intent predictions of the chunks (in a sliding window manner) within it. We conduct experiments on two public datasets, MixATIS and MixSNIPS, and the results show that our model achieves state-of-the-art performance. Haojing Huang 0001, Peijie Huang, Zhanbiao Zhu, Jia Li 0042, Piyuan Lin |
IEEE Signal Process. Lett. | 1 |