Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Andrea Bertazzi
dblp:383/9455
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
3as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 3 first-author · 3 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
3 papers |
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 87% Generative modeling · 13% | |
| Network and information security
1 paper |
Privacy and data protection · 100% |
Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › monte carlo methods
markov chain monte carlo |
1.7 | 2 | 2025 | Piecewise deterministic sampling with splitting schemes · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2025 Differential Privacy Guarantees of Markov Chain Monte Carlo Algorithms · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › monte carlo methods › markov chain monte carlo
piecewise deterministic markov process sampler |
1.6 | 2 | 2025 | Piecewise deterministic sampling with splitting schemes · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2025 Piecewise deterministic generative models · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › monte carlo methods › markov chain monte carlo
langevin dynamics |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Differential Privacy Guarantees of Markov Chain Monte Carlo Algorithms · ICML 2025 |
Privacy and data protection
differential privacy |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Differential Privacy Guarantees of Markov Chain Monte Carlo Algorithms · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
generative model |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Piecewise deterministic generative models · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › stochastic processes
markov processes |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Piecewise deterministic generative models · NeurIPS 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
rényi differential privacy · 1.7girsanov's theorem · 1.7bouncy particle sampler · 1.6zig-zag sampler · 0.9metropolis-hastings · 0.9zig-zag process · 0.8randomized hamiltonian monte carlo · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Differential Privacy Guarantees of Markov Chain Monte Carlo AlgorithmsabstractThis paper aims to provide differential privacy (DP) guarantees for Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) algorithms. In a first part, we establish DP guarantees on samples output by MCMC algorithms as well as Monte Carlo estimators associated with these methods under assumptions on the convergence properties of the underlying Markov chain. In particular, our results highlight the critical condition of ensuring the target distribution is differentially private itself. In a second part, we specialise our analysis to the unadjusted Langevin algorithm and stochastic gradient Langevin dynamics and establish guarantees on their (Rényi) DP. To this end, we develop a novel methodology based on Girsanov’s theorem combined with a perturbation trick to obtain bounds for an unbounded domain and in a non-convex setting. We establish: (i) uniform in $n$ privacy guarantees when the state of the chain after $n$ iterations is released, (ii) bounds on the privacy of the entire chain trajectory. These findings provide concrete guidelines for privacy-preserving MCMC. Andrea Bertazzi, Tim Johnston, Gareth O. Roberts, Alain Durmus |
ICML | 1 |
| 2025 | Piecewise deterministic sampling with splitting schemesabstractWe introduce Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) algorithms based on numerical approximations of piecewise-deterministic Markov processes obtained with the framework of splitting schemes. We present unadjusted as well as adjusted algorithms, for which the asymptotic bias due to the discretisation error is removed applying a non-reversible Metropolis-Hastings filter. In a general framework we demonstrate that the unadjusted schemes have weak error of second order in the step size, while typically maintaining a computational cost of only one gradient evaluation of the negative log-target function per iteration. Focusing then on unadjusted schemes based on the Bouncy Particle and Zig-Zag samplers, we provide conditions ensuring geometric ergodicity and consider the expansion of the invariant measure in terms of the step size. We analyse the dependence of the leading term in this expansion on the refreshment rate and on the structure of the splitting scheme, giving a guideline on which structure is best. Finally, we illustrate promising results for our samplers with numerical experiments on a Bayesian imaging inverse problem and a system of interacting particles. Andrea Bertazzi, Paul Dobson, Pierre Monmarché |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 1 |
| 2024 | Piecewise deterministic generative modelsabstractWe introduce a novel class of generative models based on piecewise deterministic Markov processes (PDMPs), a family of non-diffusive stochastic processes consisting of deterministic motion and random jumps at random times. Similarly to diffusions, such Markov processes admit time reversals that turn out to be PDMPs as well. We apply this observation to three PDMPs considered in the literature: the Zig-Zag process, Bouncy Particle Sampler, and Randomised Hamiltonian Monte Carlo. For these three particular instances, we show that the jump rates and kernels of the corresponding time reversals admit explicit expressions depending on some conditional densities of the PDMP under consideration before and after a jump. Based on these results, we propose efficient training procedures to learn these characteristics and consider methods to approximately simulate the reverse process. Finally, we provide bounds in the total variation distance between the data distribution and the resulting distribution of our model in the case where the base distribution is the standard $d$-dimensional Gaussian distribution. Promising numerical simulations support further investigations into this class of models. Andrea Bertazzi, Dario Shariatian, Umut Simsekli, Eric Moulines, Alain Durmus |
NeurIPS | 1 |