Multimodal foundation models (MMFMs) play a crucial role in various applications, including autonomous driving, healthcare, and virtual assistants. However, several studies have revealed vulnerabilities in these models, such as generating unsafe content by text-to-image models. Existing benchmarks on multimodal models either predominantly assess the helpfulness of these models, or only focus on limited perspectives such as fairness and privacy. In this paper, we present the first unified platform, MMDT (Multimodal DecodingTrust), designed to provide a comprehensive safety and trustworthiness evaluation for MMFMs. Our platform assesses models from multiple perspectives, including safety, hallucination, fairness/bias, privacy, adversarial robustness, and out-of-distribution (OOD) generalization. We have designed various evaluation scenarios and red teaming algorithms under different tasks for each perspective to generate challenging data, forming a high-quality benchmark. We evaluate a range of multimodal models using MMDT, and our findings reveal a series of vulnerabilities and areas for improvement across these perspectives. This work introduces the first comprehensive and unique safety and trustworthiness evaluation platform for MMFMs, paving the way for developing safer and more reliable MMFMs and systems. Our platform and benchmark are available at https://mmdecodingtrust.github.io/.

Curriculum learning is a training paradigm where machine learning models are trained in a meaningful order, inspired by the way humans learn curricula. Due to its capability to improve model generalization and convergence, curriculum learning has gained considerable attention and has been widely applied to various research domains. Nevertheless, as new curriculum learning methods continue to emerge, it remains an open issue to benchmark them fairly. Therefore, we develop CurBench, the first benchmark that supports systematic evaluations for curriculum learning. Specifically, it consists of 15 datasets spanning 3 research domains: computer vision, natural language processing, and graph machine learning, along with 3 settings: standard, noise, and imbalance. To facilitate a comprehensive comparison, we establish the evaluation from 2 dimensions: performance and complexity. CurBench also provides a unified toolkit that plugs automatic curricula into general machine learning processes, enabling the implementation of 15 core curriculum learning methods. On the basis of this benchmark, we conduct comparative experiments and make empirical analyses of existing methods. CurBench is open-source and publicly available at https://github.com/THUMNLab/CurBench.