Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Jérôme Graf
dblp:384/9505
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Computer networks · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer networks
1 paper |
Internet architecture and protocols · 67% Routing and switching · 33% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Internet architecture and protocols › packet processing
packet classification |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | CGFE: Efficient Range Encoding for TCAMs · INFOCOM 2025 |
Internet architecture and protocols › packet processing › packet classification › range matching
range encoding |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | CGFE: Efficient Range Encoding for TCAMs · INFOCOM 2025 |
Routing and switching
TCAM |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | CGFE: Efficient Range Encoding for TCAMs · INFOCOM 2025 |
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | CGFE: Efficient Range Encoding for TCAMs
Jérôme Graf, Vitalii Demianiuk, Pavel Chuprikov, Sergey I. Nikolenko, Patrick Eugster |
INFOCOM | 1 |
| 2024 | FARM: Comprehensive Data Center Network Monitoring and ManagementabstractModern data centers face growing workloads, putting accrued pressure on network monitoring solutions necessary for ensuring correct and efficient operation. Advances in network programmability have meanwhile led to yet more monitoring data being straightforwardly collected from switches, exacerbating bottlenecks in corresponding collection-centric approaches. This limits scalability and responsiveness, especially when several monitoring tasks are deployed side-by-side, as is common for network management. We present a novel and comprehensive selection-centric solution for network monitoring and management (M&M) called FARM that significantly simplifies the development and deployment of network M&M tasks while being effective and scalable. FARM's main novelty lies in its comprehensive design. Instead of focusing solely on individual parts of network monitoring, FARM takes a global perspective on the problem and aligns all of its components correspondingly: a strongly decentralized software architecture, a specifically designed programming model, and an integrated performance optimization framework. In short, FARM performs monitoring (re)actions locally on switches to the extent possible, using centralized components only if and when needed, and globally optimizes placement, considering placement constraints intrinsically expressed through its programming model as well as commonalities among tasks. Deployed in a production data center, FARM shows significant gains in responsiveness (up to 3427× faster over recent generic approaches and 4 × faster over highly specialized solutions), and savings in network band-width (10000 ×) and computational effort. Placement optimization shows excellent scalability up to 10200 seeds across 1040 switches. Jérôme Graf, Pavel Chuprikov, Patrick Eugster, Patrick Jahnke |
ICDCS | 1 |