Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Guilherme Ost
dblp:385/0351
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 100% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference
high-dimensional inference |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Sparse Markov Models for High-dimensional Inference · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2023 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › stochastic processes
markov chain |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Sparse Markov Models for High-dimensional Inference · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2023 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
recursive lag selection · 0.7martingale concentration inequality · 0.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Sparse Markov Models for High-dimensional InferenceabstractFinite-order Markov models are well-studied models for dependent finite alphabet data. Despite their generality, application in empirical work is rare when the order $d$ is large relative to the sample size $n$ (e.g., $d = \mathcal{O}(n)$). Practitioners rarely use higher-order Markov models because (1) the number of parameters grows exponentially with the order, (2) the sample size $n$ required to estimate each parameter grows exponentially with the order, and (3) the interpretation is often difficult. Here, we consider a subclass of Markov models called Mixture of Transition Distribution (MTD) models, proving that when the set of relevant lags is sparse (i.e., $\mathcal{O}(\log(n))$), we can consistently and efficiently recover the lags and estimate the transition probabilities of high-dimensional ($d = \mathcal{O}(n)$) MTD models. Moreover, the estimated model allows straightforward interpretation. The key innovation is a recursive procedure for a priori selection of the relevant lags of the model. We prove a new structural result for the MTD and an improved martingale concentration inequality to prove our results. Using simulations, we show that our method performs well compared to other relevant methods. We also illustrate the usefulness of our method on weather data where the proposed method correctly recovers the long-range dependence. Guilherme Ost, Daniel Y. Takahashi |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 1 |