VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Elad Kinsbruner
dblp:385/0772
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0003-1314-0945ORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Theory of computation · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Program verification · 100% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Distributed computing theory · 100% |
Topics — the 1 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Program verification
automated reasoning and model checking |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Veil: A Framework for Automated and Interactive Verification of Transition Systems · CAV (3) 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
proof assistant · 1.7interactive verification · 1.7SMT solvers · 0.9SMT solver · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Veil: A Framework for Automated and Interactive Verification of Transition SystemsabstractAbstract We present , an open-source framework for automated and interactive verification of transition systems, aimed specifically at conducting machine-assisted proofs about concurrent and distributed algorithms. is implemented on top of the proof assistant. It allows one to describe a transition system and its specification in a simple imperative language, producing verification conditions in first-order logic, to be discharged automatically via a range of SMT solvers. In case automated verification fails or if the system’s description requires statements in a higher-order logic, provides an interactive verification mode, by virtue of being embedded in a general-purpose proof assistant. We have evaluated on a large set of case studies from the distributed system verification literature, showing that its automated verification performance is acceptable for practical verification tasks, while it also allows for seamless automated/interactive verification of system specifications beyond the reach of existing automated provers. George Pîrlea, Vladimir Gladshtein, Elad Kinsbruner, Qiyuan Zhao, Ilya Sergey |
CAV (3) | 3 |
| 2024 | Constrictor: Immutability as a Design Concept
Elad Kinsbruner, Shachar Itzhaky, Hila Peleg |
ECOOP | 1 |