Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data.

Elad Kinsbruner

dblp:385/0772 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0003-1314-0945ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Theory of computation · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Program verification · 100%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Distributed computing theory · 100%

Topics — the 1 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Program verification
automated reasoning and model checking
0.912025
Veil: A Framework for Automated and Interactive Verification of Transition Systems · CAV (3) 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

proof assistant · 1.7interactive verification · 1.7SMT solvers · 0.9SMT solver · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Veil: A Framework for Automated and Interactive Verification of Transition Systems
abstract
Abstract We present , an open-source framework for automated and interactive verification of transition systems, aimed specifically at conducting machine-assisted proofs about concurrent and distributed algorithms. is implemented on top of the proof assistant. It allows one to describe a transition system and its specification in a simple imperative language, producing verification conditions in first-order logic, to be discharged automatically via a range of SMT solvers. In case automated verification fails or if the system’s description requires statements in a higher-order logic, provides an interactive verification mode, by virtue of being embedded in a general-purpose proof assistant. We have evaluated on a large set of case studies from the distributed system verification literature, showing that its automated verification performance is acceptable for practical verification tasks, while it also allows for seamless automated/interactive verification of system specifications beyond the reach of existing automated provers.
George Pîrlea, Vladimir Gladshtein, Elad Kinsbruner, Qiyuan Zhao, Ilya Sergey
CAV (3)3
2024 Constrictor: Immutability as a Design Concept
Elad Kinsbruner, Shachar Itzhaky, Hila Peleg
ECOOP1