Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Henriette Knopp

dblp:385/3105 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · unresolved

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Empirical software engineering · 38% Requirements engineering and software design · 38% Software maintenance and evolution · 23%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Empirical software engineering
mining software repositories
0.912025
A Large-Scale Study of Model Integration in ML-Enabled Software Systems · ICSE 2025
Requirements engineering and software design
software architecture
0.912025
A Large-Scale Study of Model Integration in ML-Enabled Software Systems · ICSE 2025
Software maintenance and evolution › software ecosystems
model reuse
0.312025
A Large-Scale Study of Model Integration in ML-Enabled Software Systems · ICSE 2025
Software maintenance and evolution
software ecosystems
0.312025
A Large-Scale Study of Model Integration in ML-Enabled Software Systems · ICSE 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

repository mining · 0.9empirical study · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 A Large-Scale Study of Model Integration in ML-Enabled Software Systems
abstract
The rise of machine learning (ML) and its integration into software systems has drastically changed development practices. While software engineering traditionally focused on manually created code artifacts with dedicated processes and architectures, ML-enabled systems require additional data-science methods and tools to create ML artifacts-especially ML models and training data. However, integrating models into systems, and managing the many different artifacts involved, is far from trivial. ML-enabled systems can easily have multiple ML models that interact with each other and with traditional code in intricate ways. Unfortunately, while challenges and practices of building ML-enabled systems have been studied, little is known about the characteristics of real-world ML-enabled systems beyond isolated examples. Improving engineering processes and architectures for ML-enabled systems requires imnroving the empirical understanding of these systems. We present a large-scale study of 2,928 open-source ML-enabled software systems. We classified and analyzed them to determine system characteristics, model and code reuse practices, and architectural aspects of integrating ML models. Our findings show that these systems still mainly consist of traditional source code, and that ML model reuse through code duplication or pre-trained models is common. We also identified different ML integration patterns and related implementation practices. We hope that our results help improve practices for integrating ML models, bringing data science and software engineering closer together.
Yorick Sens, Henriette Knopp, Sven Peldszus, Thorsten Berger
ICSE2