Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data.

Robert Mensing

dblp:385/3398 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 since 2021Theory of computation · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Automated reasoning and model checking · 67% Logic in computer science · 33%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Robot navigation and mapping · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Automated reasoning and model checking › program verification
deductive verification
0.812024
Reusable Specification Patterns for Verification of Resilience in Autonomous Hybrid Systems · FM (2) 2024
Logic in computer science › modal logic › dynamic logic
differential dynamic logic
0.812024
Reusable Specification Patterns for Verification of Resilience in Autonomous Hybrid Systems · FM (2) 2024
Automated reasoning and model checking
hybrid systems verification
0.812024
Reusable Specification Patterns for Verification of Resilience in Autonomous Hybrid Systems · FM (2) 2024
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping
safe autonomous systems
0.212024
Reusable Specification Patterns for Verification of Resilience in Autonomous Hybrid Systems · FM (2) 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

reinforcement learning · 1.5interactive theorem proving · 1.5hybrid contracts · 1.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Reusable Specification Patterns for Verification of Resilience in Autonomous Hybrid Systems
abstract
Abstract Autonomous hybrid systems are systems that combine discrete and continuous behavior with autonomous decision-making, e.g., using reinforcement learning. Such systems are increasingly used in safety-critical applications such as self-driving cars, autonomous robots or water supply systems. Thus, it is crucial to ensure their safety and resilience, i.e., that they function correctly even in the presence of dynamic changes and disruptions. In this paper, we present an approach to obtain formal resilience guarantees for autonomous hybrid systems using the interactive theorem prover KeYmaera X. Our key ideas are threefold: First, we derive a formalization of resilience that is tailored to autonomous hybrid systems. Second, we present reusable patterns for modeling stressors, detecting disruptions, and specifying resilience as a service level response in the differential dynamic logic (d $$\mathcal {L}$$ L ). Third, we combine these concepts with an existing approach for the safe integration of learning components using hybrid contracts, and extend it towards dynamic adaptations to stressors. By combining reusable patterns for stressors, observers, and adaptation contracts for learning components, we provide a systematic approach for the deductive verification of resilience of autonomous hybrid systems with reduced specification effort. We demonstrate the applicability of our approach with two case studies, an autonomous robot and an intelligent water distribution system.
Julius Adelt, Robert Mensing, Paula Herber
FM (2)2