Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Peixian Ma
dblp:385/3739
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0003-4181-365XORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
2 papers |
Data models and query languages · 91% Information retrieval · 9% | |
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Language models and text generation · 100% |
Topics — the 6 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Data models and query languages › natural language interface › natural language interface to database
text-to-SQL |
1.7 | 2 | 2025 | A Survey of Text-to-SQL in the Era of LLMs: Where Are We, and Where Are We Going? · IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2025 SQL-R1: Training Natural Language to SQL Reasoning Model By Reinforcement Learning · NeurIPS 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
large language model |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | A Survey of Text-to-SQL in the Era of LLMs: Where Are We, and Where Are We Going? · IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › large language model reasoning
reasoning model training |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | SQL-R1: Training Natural Language to SQL Reasoning Model By Reinforcement Learning · NeurIPS 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › natural language understanding › question answering
text-to-SQL parsing |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | A Survey of Text-to-SQL in the Era of LLMs: Where Are We, and Where Are We Going? · IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2025 |
Data models and query languages › natural language interface
natural language interface to database |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | A Survey of Text-to-SQL in the Era of LLMs: Where Are We, and Where Are We Going? · IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2025 |
Information retrieval
evaluation |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | A Survey of Text-to-SQL in the Era of LLMs: Where Are We, and Where Are We Going? · IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
supervised fine-tuning · 1.7reinforcement learning · 1.7large language model · 1.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Augmenting Continual Learning of Diseases with LLM-Generated Visual ConceptsabstractContinual learning is essential for medical image classification systems to adapt to dynamically evolving clinical environments. The integration of multimodal information can significantly enhance continual learning of image classes. However, while existing approaches do utilize textual modality information, they solely rely on simplistic templates with a class name, thereby neglecting richer semantic information. To address these limitations, we propose a novel framework that harnesses visual concepts generated by large language models (LLMs) as discriminative semantic guidance. Our method dynamically constructs a visual concept pool with a similarity-based filtering mechanism to prevent redundancy. Then, to integrate the concepts into the continual learning process, we employ a crossmodal image-concept attention module, coupled with an attention loss. Through attention, the module can leverage the semantic knowledge from relevant visual concepts and produce classrepresentative fused features for classification. Experiments on medical and natural image datasets show our method achieves state-of-the-art performance. Jiantao Tan, Peixian Ma, Zhiming Dai, Kanghao Chen |
BIBM | 2 |
| 2025 | SQL-R1: Training Natural Language to SQL Reasoning Model By Reinforcement LearningabstractNatural Language to SQL (NL2SQL) enables intuitive interactions with databases by transforming natural language queries into structured SQL statements. Despite recent advancements in enhancing human-computer interaction within database applications, significant challenges persist, particularly regarding the inference performance in complex scenarios involving multi-table joins and nested queries. Current methodologies primarily utilize supervised fine-tuning (SFT) to train the NL2SQL model, which may limit adaptability and interpretability in new environments (e.g., finance and healthcare).
In order to enhance the reasoning performance of the NL2SQL model in the above complex situations, we introduce SQL-R1, a novel NL2SQL reasoning model trained by the reinforcement learning (RL) algorithms.
We design a specialized RL-based reward function tailored for NL2SQL tasks and discussed the impact of cold start and synthetic data on the effectiveness of intensive training. In addition, we achieve competitive accuracy using only a tiny amount of synthetic NL2SQL data for augmented training and further explore data engineering for RL. In existing experiments, SQL-R1 achieves execution accuracy of 88.6\% and 67.1\% on the benchmark Spider and BIRD, respectively. The code is available at https://github.com/IDEA-FinAI/SQL-R1. Peixian Ma, Xialie Zhuang, Chengjin Xu, Xuhui Jiang, Jian Guo 0016 |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2025 | A Survey of Text-to-SQL in the Era of LLMs: Where Are We, and Where Are We Going?abstractTranslating users' natural language queries (NL) into SQL queries (i.e., Text-to-SQL, a.k.a. NL2SQL) can significantly reduce barriers to accessing relational databases and support various commercial applications. The performance of Text-to-SQL has been greatly enhanced with the emergence of Large Language Models (LLMs). In this survey, we provide a comprehensive review of Text-to-SQL techniques powered by LLMs, covering its entire lifecycle from the following four aspects: (1)Model:Text-to-SQL translation techniques that tackle not only NL ambiguity and under-specification, but also properly map NL with database schema and instances; (2)Data:From the collection of training data, data synthesis due to training data scarcity, to Text-to-SQL benchmarks; (3)Evaluation:Evaluating Text-to-SQL methods from multiple angles using different metrics and granularities; and (4)Error Analysis:analyzing Text-to-SQL errors to find the root cause and guiding Text-to-SQL models to evolve. Moreover, we offer a rule of thumb for developing Text-to-SQL solutions. Finally, we discuss the research challenges and open problems of Text-to-SQL in the LLMs era. Shuyu Shen, Boyan Li 0001, Peixian Ma, Runzhi Jiang, Ju Fan, Guoliang Li 0001, Nan Tang 0001, Yuyu Luo |
IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. | 4 |