Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Abhijit Ogale

dblp:385/7586 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Vision and language · 38% Robot navigation and mapping · 38% Representation and self-supervised learning · 23%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Information retrieval · 100%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computer vision › Vision and language
vision-language pretraining
0.912025
Learning Visual Composition through Improved Semantic Guidance · CVPR 2025
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping
visual memory
0.912025
Towards flexible perception with visual memory · ICML 2025
Information retrieval
similarity search
0.912025
Towards flexible perception with visual memory · ICML 2025
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
contrastive learning
0.312025
Learning Visual Composition through Improved Semantic Guidance · CVPR 2025
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › embedding learning
image embedding
0.312025
Towards flexible perception with visual memory · ICML 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

unlearning · 1.7nearest neighbor search · 1.7memory pruning · 1.7contrastive learning · 0.9caption enhancement · 0.9CLIP · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Learning Visual Composition through Improved Semantic Guidance
abstract
Visual imagery does not consist of solitary objects, but instead reflects the composition of a multitude of fluid concepts. While there have been great advances in visual representation learning, such advances have focused on building better representations for a small number of discrete objects bereft of an understanding of how these objects are interacting. One can observe this limitation in representations learned through captions or contrastive learning – where the learned model treats an image essentially as a bag of words. Several works have attempted to address this limitation through the development of bespoke architectures. In this work, we focus on simple and scalable approaches. In particular, we demonstrate that by improving weakly labeled data, i.e. captions, we can vastly improve the performance of standard contrastive learning approaches. Previous CLIP models achieved near chance rate on challenging tasks probing compositional learning. However, our simple approach boosts performance of CLIP substantially and achieves state of the art results on compositional benchmarks such as ARO and SugarCrepe. Furthermore, we showcase our results on a relatively new captioning benchmark derived from DOCCI. We demonstrate through a series of ablations that a standard CLIP model trained with enhanced data may demonstrate impressive performance on image retrieval tasks.
Austin Stone, Hagen Soltau, Robert Geirhos, Xi Yi, Bingyi Cao, Kaifeng Chen, Abhijit Ogale, Jonathon Shlens
CVPR8
2025 Towards flexible perception with visual memory
abstract
Training a neural network is a monolithic endeavor, akin to carving knowledge into stone: once the process is completed, editing the knowledge in a network is hard, since all information is distributed across the network's weights. We here explore a simple, compelling alternative by marrying the representational power of deep neural networks with the flexibility of a database. Decomposing the task of image classification into image similarity (from a pre-trained embedding) and search (via fast nearest neighbor retrieval from a knowledge database), we build on well-established components to construct a simple and flexible visual memory that has the following key capabilities: (1.) The ability to flexibly add data across scales: from individual samples all the way to entire classes and billion-scale data; (2.) The ability to remove data through unlearning and memory pruning; (3.) An interpretable decision-mechanism on which we can intervene to control its behavior. Taken together, these capabilities comprehensively demonstrate the benefits of an explicit visual memory. We hope that it might contribute to a conversation on how knowledge should be represented in deep vision models---beyond carving it in "stone" weights.
Robert Geirhos, Priyank Jaini, Austin Stone, Sourabh Medapati, Xi Yi, George Toderici, Abhijit Ogale, Jonathon Shlens
ICML7