Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Z. Z. Ren

dblp:385/7593 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Language models and text generation · 33% Reinforcement learning · 33% Knowledge representation and reasoning · 33%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Automated reasoning and model checking · 100%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
large language model
0.912025
DeepSeek-Prover-V1.5: Harnessing Proof Assistant Feedback for Reinforcement Learning and Monte-Carlo Tree Search · ICLR 2025
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
policy learning
0.912025
DeepSeek-Prover-V1.5: Harnessing Proof Assistant Feedback for Reinforcement Learning and Monte-Carlo Tree Search · ICLR 2025
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › automated reasoning
proof search
0.912025
DeepSeek-Prover-V1.5: Harnessing Proof Assistant Feedback for Reinforcement Learning and Monte-Carlo Tree Search · ICLR 2025
Automated reasoning and model checking › theorem proving
proof generation
0.912025
DeepSeek-Prover-V1.5: Harnessing Proof Assistant Feedback for Reinforcement Learning and Monte-Carlo Tree Search · ICLR 2025
Automated reasoning and model checking
theorem proving
0.912025
DeepSeek-Prover-V1.5: Harnessing Proof Assistant Feedback for Reinforcement Learning and Monte-Carlo Tree Search · ICLR 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

reinforcement learning · 1.7monte carlo tree search · 1.7large language model · 1.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 DeepSeek-Prover-V1.5: Harnessing Proof Assistant Feedback for Reinforcement Learning and Monte-Carlo Tree Search
abstract
Lean is an advanced proof assistant designed to facilitate formal theorem proving by providing a variety of interactive feedback. In this paper, we explore methodologies to leverage proof assistant feedback to augment the capabilities of large language models in constructing formal proofs. First, we deploy online reinforcement learning using Lean verification outcomes as the reward signal to improve the proof completion policy. This straightforward approach shows great promise in enhancing the model's alignment with the formal verification system. In addition, we propose RMaxTS, a variant of Monte-Carlo tree search that employs an intrinsic-reward-driven exploration strategy to generate diverse proof paths. The tree structure is organized to represent the transitions of intermediate tactic states, extracted from the compilation messages given by Lean's tactic mode. The intrinsic reward is constructed to incentivize the discovery of novel tactic states, which helps to to mitigate the sparse-reward problem inherent in proof search. These techniques lead to a more efficient planning scheme for formal proof generation, achieving new state-of-the-art results on both miniF2F and ProofNet benchmarks.
Huajian Xin, Z. Z. Ren, Junxiao Song, Zhihong Shao, Wanjia Zhao, Qiushi Du, Qihao Zhu, Dejian Yang, Zhibin Gou, Z. F. Wu, Fuli Luo, Chong Ruan
ICLR2