Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Zhun Mou
dblp:385/9110
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper |
Multimedia systems and quality of experience · 50% Visual content generation and editing · 50% | |
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Vision and language · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computer vision › Vision and language
video-language understanding |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | GRADEO: Towards Human-Like Evaluation for Text-to-Video Generation via Multi-Step Reasoning · ICML 2025 |
Visual content generation and editing › video generation
text-to-video generation evaluation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | GRADEO: Towards Human-Like Evaluation for Text-to-Video Generation via Multi-Step Reasoning · ICML 2025 |
Multimedia systems and quality of experience
video quality assessment |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | GRADEO: Towards Human-Like Evaluation for Text-to-Video Generation via Multi-Step Reasoning · ICML 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
multi-step reasoning · 1.7large language model · 1.7instruction tuning · 1.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | GRADEO: Towards Human-Like Evaluation for Text-to-Video Generation via Multi-Step ReasoningabstractRecent great advances in video generation models have demonstrated their potential to produce high-quality videos, bringing challenges to effective evaluation. Unlike human evaluation, existing automated evaluation metrics lack high-level semantic understanding and reasoning capabilities for video, thus making them infeasible and unexplainable. To fill this gap, we curate **GRADEO-Instruct**, a multi-dimensional T2V evaluation instruction tuning dataset, including 3.3k videos from over 10 existing video generation models and multi-step reasoning assessments converted by 16k human annotations. We then introduce **GRADEO**, one of the first specifically designed video evaluation models, which **grades** AI-generated **videos** for explainable scores and assessments through multi-step reasoning. Experiments show that our method aligns better with human evaluations than existing methods. Furthermore, our benchmarking reveals that current video generation models struggle to produce content that aligns with human reasoning and complex real-world scenarios. The models, datasets, and codes will be released soon. Zhun Mou, Bin Xia 0014, Zhengchao Huang, Wenming Yang, Jiaya Jia |
ICML | 1 |