Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Zhun Mou

dblp:385/9110 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper
Multimedia systems and quality of experience · 50% Visual content generation and editing · 50%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Vision and language · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computer vision › Vision and language
video-language understanding
0.912025
GRADEO: Towards Human-Like Evaluation for Text-to-Video Generation via Multi-Step Reasoning · ICML 2025
Visual content generation and editing › video generation
text-to-video generation evaluation
0.912025
GRADEO: Towards Human-Like Evaluation for Text-to-Video Generation via Multi-Step Reasoning · ICML 2025
Multimedia systems and quality of experience
video quality assessment
0.912025
GRADEO: Towards Human-Like Evaluation for Text-to-Video Generation via Multi-Step Reasoning · ICML 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

multi-step reasoning · 1.7large language model · 1.7instruction tuning · 1.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 GRADEO: Towards Human-Like Evaluation for Text-to-Video Generation via Multi-Step Reasoning
abstract
Recent great advances in video generation models have demonstrated their potential to produce high-quality videos, bringing challenges to effective evaluation. Unlike human evaluation, existing automated evaluation metrics lack high-level semantic understanding and reasoning capabilities for video, thus making them infeasible and unexplainable. To fill this gap, we curate **GRADEO-Instruct**, a multi-dimensional T2V evaluation instruction tuning dataset, including 3.3k videos from over 10 existing video generation models and multi-step reasoning assessments converted by 16k human annotations. We then introduce **GRADEO**, one of the first specifically designed video evaluation models, which **grades** AI-generated **videos** for explainable scores and assessments through multi-step reasoning. Experiments show that our method aligns better with human evaluations than existing methods. Furthermore, our benchmarking reveals that current video generation models struggle to produce content that aligns with human reasoning and complex real-world scenarios. The models, datasets, and codes will be released soon.
Zhun Mou, Bin Xia 0014, Zhengchao Huang, Wenming Yang, Jiaya Jia
ICML1