Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Chun Tong Lei

dblp:386/2753 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
0009-0004-1835-500XORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Security and privacy · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
3 papers
Generative modeling · 58% Trustworthy machine learning · 19% Image recognition and object detection · 19%
Network and information security
1 paper
Security and privacy of machine learning · 100%

Topics — the 11 heaviest of 12, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Generative modeling
diffusion model
2.632025
A Gray-Box Attack Against Latent Diffusion Model-Based Image Editing by Posterior Collapse · IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. 2025
T2ICount: Enhancing Cross-modal Understanding for Zero-Shot Counting · CVPR 2025
Instant Adversarial Purification with Adversarial Consistency Distillation · CVPR 2025
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness › adversarial robustness › test-time defense
adversarial purification
0.912025
Instant Adversarial Purification with Adversarial Consistency Distillation · CVPR 2025
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
adversarial robustness
0.912025
Instant Adversarial Purification with Adversarial Consistency Distillation · CVPR 2025
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model › diffusion distillation
consistency distillation
0.912025
Instant Adversarial Purification with Adversarial Consistency Distillation · CVPR 2025
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model
latent diffusion model
0.912025
A Gray-Box Attack Against Latent Diffusion Model-Based Image Editing by Posterior Collapse · IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. 2025
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
object counting
0.912025
T2ICount: Enhancing Cross-modal Understanding for Zero-Shot Counting · CVPR 2025
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model › text-to-image generation
text-to-image diffusion model
0.912025
T2ICount: Enhancing Cross-modal Understanding for Zero-Shot Counting · CVPR 2025
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection › object counting
zero-shot object counting
0.912025
T2ICount: Enhancing Cross-modal Understanding for Zero-Shot Counting · CVPR 2025
Security and privacy of machine learning › adversarial attack › adversarial attacks on generative models
diffusion-based adversarial attack
0.912025
A Gray-Box Attack Against Latent Diffusion Model-Based Image Editing by Posterior Collapse · IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. 2025
Security and privacy of machine learning
generative model security
0.912025
A Gray-Box Attack Against Latent Diffusion Model-Based Image Editing by Posterior Collapse · IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. 2025
Computer vision › Vision and language
vision-language model
0.312025
T2ICount: Enhancing Cross-modal Understanding for Zero-Shot Counting · CVPR 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

score matching · 2.6posterior collapse · 2.6representational regional coherence loss · 0.9parameter-efficient fine-tuning · 0.9hierarchical semantic correction · 0.9edge detection · 0.9diffusion model · 0.9consistency distillation · 0.9LoRA · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Instant Adversarial Purification with Adversarial Consistency Distillation
abstract
Neural networks have revolutionized numerous fields with their exceptional performance, yet they remain susceptible to adversarial attacks through subtle perturbations. While diffusion-based purification methods like DiffPure offer promising defense mechanisms, their computational overhead presents a significant practical limitation. In this paper, we introduce One Step Control Purification (OSCP), a novel defense framework that achieves robust adversarial purification in a single Neural Function Evaluation (NFE) within diffusion models. We propose Gaussian Adversarial Noise Distillation (GAND) as the distillation objective and Controlled Adversarial Purification (CAP) as the inference pipeline, which makes OSCP demonstrate remarkable effi-ciency while maintaining defense efficacy. Our proposed GAND addresses a fundamental tension between consistency distillation and adversarial perturbation, bridging the gap between natural and adversarial manifolds in the latent space, while remaining computationally efficient through Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning (PEFT) methods such as LoRA, eliminating the high computational budget request from full parameter fine-tuning. The CAP guides the purifi-cation process through the unlearnable edge detection operator calculated by the input image as an extra prompt, effectively preventing the purified images from deviating from their original appearance when large purification steps are used. Our experimental results on ImageNet showcase OSCP’s superior performance, achieving a 74.19% defense success rate with merely 0.1s per purification — a 100-fold speedup compared to conventional approaches.
Chun Tong Lei, Hon Ming Yam, Zhongliang Guo 0001, Yifei Qian, Chun Pong Lau 0001
CVPR1
2025 T2ICount: Enhancing Cross-modal Understanding for Zero-Shot Counting
abstract
Zero-Shot object counting aims to count instances of arbitrary object categories specified by text descriptions. Existing methods typically rely on vision-language models like CLIP, but often exhibit limited sensitivity to text prompts. We present T21 Count, a diffusion-based framework that lever-ages rich prior knowledge and fine-grained visual understanding from pretrained diffusion models. While one-step demising ensures efficiency, it leads to weakened text sensitivity. To address this challenge, we propose a Hierarchical Semantic Correction Module that progressively refines text-image feature alignment, and a Representational Regional Coherence Loss that provides reliable supervision signals by leveraging the cross-attention maps extracted from the demising U-Net. Furthermore, we observe that current benchmarks mainly focus on majority objects in images, potentially masking models' text sensitivity. To address this, we contribute a challenging re-annotated subset of FSC147 for better evaluation of text-guided counting ability. Extensive experiments demonstrate that our method achieves superior performance across different benchmarks. Code is available at https://github.com/chal5yq/T2lCount.
Yifei Qian, Zhongliang Guo 0001, Bowen Deng 0006, Chun Tong Lei, Shuai Zhao 0007, Chun Pong Lau 0001, Xiaopeng Hong, Michael P. Pound
CVPR4
2025 A Gray-Box Attack Against Latent Diffusion Model-Based Image Editing by Posterior Collapse
abstract
Recent advancements in Latent Diffusion Models (LDMs) have revolutionized image synthesis and manipulation, raising significant concerns about data misappropriation and intellectual property infringement. While adversarial attacks have been extensively explored as a protective measure against such misuse of generative AI, current approaches are severely limited by their heavy reliance on model-specific knowledge and substantial computational costs. Drawing inspiration from the posterior collapse phenomenon observed in VAE training, we propose the Posterior Collapse Attack (PCA), a novel framework for protecting images from unauthorized manipulation. Through comprehensive theoretical analysis and empirical validation, we identify two distinct collapse phenomena during VAE inference: diffusion collapse and concentration collapse. Based on this discovery, we design a unified loss function that can flexibly achieve both types of collapse through parameter adjustment, each corresponding to different protection objectives in preventing image manipulation. Our method significantly reduces dependence on model-specific knowledge by requiring access to only the VAE encoder, which constitutes less than 4% of LDM parameters. Notably, PCA achieves prompt-invariant protection by operating on the VAE encoder before text conditioning occurs, eliminating the need for empty prompt optimization required by existing methods. This minimal requirement enables PCA to maintain adequate transferability across various VAE-based LDM architectures while effectively preventing unauthorized image editing. Extensive experiments show PCA outperforms existing techniques in protection effectiveness, computational efficiency (runtime and VRAM), and generalization across VAE-based LDM variants. Our code is available at https://github.com/ZhongliangGuo/PosteriorCollapseAttack.
Zhongliang Guo 0001, Chun Tong Lei, Lei Fang 0001, Shuai Zhao 0007, Yifei Qian, Zeyu Wang 0010, Cunjian Chen, Ognjen Arandjelovic, Chun Pong Lau 0001
IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur.2