VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Stas Syrota
dblp:386/2918
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 56% Representation and self-supervised learning · 44% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › causal representation learning
identifiability |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Identifying Metric Structures of Deep Latent Variable Models · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models
latent variable model |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Identifying Metric Structures of Deep Latent Variable Models · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models › latent variable model
deep latent variable model |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Identifying Metric Structures of Deep Latent Variable Models · ICML 2025 |
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Identifying Metric Structures of Deep Latent Variable ModelsabstractDeep latent variable models learn condensed representations of data that, hopefully, reflect the inner workings of the studied phenomena. Unfortunately, these latent representations are not statistically identifiable, meaning they cannot be uniquely determined. Domain experts, therefore, need to tread carefully when interpreting these. Current solutions limit the lack of identifiability through additional constraints on the latent variable model, e.g. by requiring labeled training data, or by restricting the expressivity of the model. We change the goal: instead of identifying the latent variables, we identify relationships between them such as meaningful distances, angles, and volumes. We prove this is feasible under very mild model conditions and without additional labeled data. We empirically demonstrate that our theory results in more reliable latent distances, offering a principled path forward in extracting trustworthy conclusions from deep latent variable models. Stas Syrota, Yevgen Zainchkovskyy, Johnny Xi, Benjamin Bloem-Reddy, Søren Hauberg |
ICML | 1 |
| 2025 | VIKING: Deep variational inference with stochastic projectionsabstractVariational mean field approximations tend to struggle with contemporary overparametrized deep neural networks. Where a Bayesian treatment is usually associated with high-quality predictions and uncertainties, the practical reality has been the opposite, with unstable training, poor predictive power, and subpar calibration. Building upon recent work on reparametrizations of neural networks, we propose a simple variational family that considers two independent linear subspaces of the parameter space. These represent functional changes inside and outside the support of training data. This allows us to build a fully-correlated approximate posterior reflecting the overparametrization that tunes easy-to-interpret hyperparameters. We develop scalable numerical routines that maximize the associated evidence lower bound (ELBO) and sample from the approximate posterior. Empirically, we observe state-of-the-art performance across tasks, models, and datasets compared to a wide array of baseline methods. Our results show that approximate Bayesian inference applied to deep neural networks is far from a lost cause when constructing inference mechanisms that reflect the geometry of reparametrizations. Samuel Matthiesen, Hrittik Roy, Nicholas Krämer, Yevgen Zainchkovskyy, Stas Syrota, Alejandro Valverde Mahou, Carl Henrik Ek, Søren Hauberg |
NeurIPS | 5 |