Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Shiwei Ruan
dblp:386/4494
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
3since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 2 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% | |
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Graph learning · 100% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Bioinformatics and computational biology › multi-omics data integration
spatial multi-omics integration |
1.9 | 2 | 2026 | GROVER: Graph-guided Representation of Omics and Vision with Expert Regulation for Adaptive Spatial Multi-omics Fusion · AAAI 2026 PRAGA: Prototype-aware Graph Adaptive Aggregation for Spatial Multi-modal Omics Analysis · AAAI 2025 |
Machine learning › Graph learning › graph neural network
graph convolutional network |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | GROVER: Graph-guided Representation of Omics and Vision with Expert Regulation for Adaptive Spatial Multi-omics Fusion · AAAI 2026 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › transcriptomics › spatial transcriptomics
spatial domain identification |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | PRAGA: Prototype-aware Graph Adaptive Aggregation for Spatial Multi-modal Omics Analysis · AAAI 2025 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
single-cell analysis |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | PRAGA: Prototype-aware Graph Adaptive Aggregation for Spatial Multi-modal Omics Analysis · AAAI 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
multimodal fusion · 2.0kolmogorov-arnold network · 2.0dynamic expert routing · 2.0contrastive learning · 2.0prototype contrastive learning · 0.9graph neural network · 0.9dynamic graph learning · 0.9bayesian gaussian mixture model · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | GROVER: Graph-guided Representation of Omics and Vision with Expert Regulation for Adaptive Spatial Multi-omics FusionabstractEffectively modeling multimodal spatial omics data is critical for understanding tissue complexity and underlying biological mechanisms. While spatial transcriptomics, proteomics, and epigenomics capture molecular features, they lack pathological morphological context. Integrating these omics with histopathological images is thus critical for comprehensive disease tissue analysis. However, substantial heterogeneity across omics, imaging, and spatial modalities poses significant challenges. Naive fusion of semantically distinct sources often leads to ambiguous representations. Additionally, the resolution mismatch between high-resolution histology images and lower-resolution sequencing spots complicates spatial alignment. Biological perturbations during sample preparation further distort modality-specific signals, hindering accurate integration. To address these challenges, we propose Graph-guided Representation of Omics and Vision with Expert Regulation for Adaptive Spatial Multi-omics Fusion (GROVER), a novel framework for adaptive integration of spatial multi-omics data. GROVER leverages a Graph Convolutional Network encoder based on Kolmogorov–Arnold Networks to capture the nonlinear dependencies between each modality and its associated spatial structure, thereby producing expressive, modality-specific embeddings. To align these representations, we introduce a spot-feature-pair contrastive learning strategy that explicitly optimizes the correspondence across modalities at each spot. Furthermore, we design a dynamic expert routing mechanism that adaptively selects informative modalities for each spot while suppressing noisy or low-quality inputs. Experiments on real-world spatial omics datasets demonstrate that GROVER outperforms state-of-the-art baselines, providing a robust and reliable solution for multimodal integration. Yongjun Xiao, Dian Meng, Xinlei Huang, Yanran Liu, Shiwei Ruan, Ziyue Qiao, Xubin Zheng |
AAAI | 5 |
| 2025 | PRAGA: Prototype-aware Graph Adaptive Aggregation for Spatial Multi-modal Omics AnalysisabstractSpatial multi-modal omics technology, highlighted by Nature Methods as an advanced biological technique in 2023, plays a critical role in resolving biological regulatory processes with spatial context. Recently, graph neural networks based on K-nearest neighbor (KNN) graphs have gained prominence in spatial multi-modal omics methods due to their ability to model semantic relations between sequencing spots. However, the fixed KNN graph fails to capture the latent semantic relations hidden by the inevitable data perturbations during the biological sequencing process, resulting in the loss of semantic information. In addition, the common lack of spot annotation and class number priors in practice further hinders the optimization of spatial multi-modal omics models. Here, we propose a novel spatial multi-modal omics resolved framework, termed Prototype-aware Graph Adaptative Aggregation for Spatial Multi-modal Omics Analysis (PRAGA). PRAGA constructs a dynamic graph to capture latent semantic relations and comprehensively integrate spatial information and feature semantics. The learnable graph structure can also denoise perturbations by learning cross-modal knowledge. Moreover, a dynamic prototype contrastive learning is proposed based on the dynamic adaptability of Bayesian Gaussian Mixture Models to optimize the multi-modal omics representations for unknown biological priors. Quantitative and qualitative experiments on simulated and real datasets with 7 competing methods demonstrate the superior performance of PRAGA. Xinlei Huang, Zhiqi Ma, Dian Meng, Yanran Liu, Shiwei Ruan, Qingqiang Sun, Xubin Zheng, Ziyue Qiao |
AAAI | 5 |
| 2025 | Predicting Gene Regulatory Relationship in Cancer Using LLM and Graph Neural Network from Known RegulationsabstractPredicting gene regulatory relationship is crucial to reveal cancer mechanism and develop targeted therapies. However, current computational methods typically estimate gene-gene associations without regulatory directions and only based on statistical significance, often lacking accuracy after validation by biological experiments. Therefore, we introduce a pipeline named LiGRNet that constructs gene regulatory networks as signed directed graphs using large language models (LLMs) from the literature and predicts potential gene regulatory relationship with magnetic signed graph neural networks (MSGNNs). First, we teach LLM to extract the known gene regulatory relationships proved by biological experiments through prompt. Then, a signed directed graph was constructed and learnt by MSGNN with a link prediction framework based on complex-valued gene embeddings. The potential regulatory relationships were predicted with direction and sign. We apply our pipeline in colorectal cancer, liver cancer, and colorectal liver metastasis including$11,000,19,000$, and 1,300 literature, respectively. The pipeline achieve$84.5 \%, 80.7 \%, 93.3 \%$accuracy in predicting unknown gene regulatory relationship. External cell line data also provide evidence for the predicted gene regulation in these cancers. Yanran Liu, Dian Meng, Xinlei Huang, Shiwei Ruan, Yinghua Chen, Rui Luo 0002, Xubin Zheng |
BIBM | 6 |