Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Mykhailo Poienko

dblp:386/4790 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
0009-0005-6382-8758ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Software testing · 100%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Autonomous driving · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Software testing › system testing › cyber-physical system testing
autonomous driving system testing
0.812024
The Flexcrash Platform for Testing Autonomous Vehicles in Mixed-Traffic Scenarios · ISSTA 2024
Software testing › test process › test design
critical scenario identification
0.812024
The Flexcrash Platform for Testing Autonomous Vehicles in Mixed-Traffic Scenarios · ISSTA 2024
Software testing
simulation-based testing
0.812024
The Flexcrash Platform for Testing Autonomous Vehicles in Mixed-Traffic Scenarios · ISSTA 2024
Robotics › Autonomous driving
perception and planning
0.212024
The Flexcrash Platform for Testing Autonomous Vehicles in Mixed-Traffic Scenarios · ISSTA 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

traffic simulation · 1.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 The Flexcrash Platform for Testing Autonomous Vehicles in Mixed-Traffic Scenarios
abstract
Autonomous vehicles (AV) leverage Artificial Intelligence to reduce accidents and improve fuel efficiency while sharing the roads with human drivers. Current AV prototypes have not yet reached these goals, highlighting the need for better development and testing methodologies. AV testing practices extensively rely on simulations, but existing AV tools focus on testing single AV instances or do not consider human drivers. Thus, they might generate many irrelevant mixed-traffic test scenarios. The Flexcrash platform addresses these issues by allowing the generation and simulation of mixed-traffic scenarios, thus enabling testers to identify realistic critical scenarios, traffic experts to create new datasets, and regulators to extend consumer testing benchmarks.
Alessio Gambi, Shreya Mathews, Benedikt Steininger, Mykhailo Poienko, David Bobek
ISSTA4