VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Riccardo Graziosi
dblp:386/5949
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers in the field
1as first author
3since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · none
Domains — venue-derived; a paper can count in several
Business Process & Enterprise Data · 2 (1 first)Database Systems & Data Management · 1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Learning optimal policies from event logs through reinforcement learning: A comparison of deep and MDP-based approaches
Stefano Branchi, Andrei Buliga 0001, Chiara Di Francescomarino, Chiara Ghidini, Riccardo Graziosi, Francesca Meneghello 0002, Massimiliano Ronzani |
Inf. Syst. | 5 |
| 2025 | Enhanced What-If Scenarios Generation by Bridging Generative Models and Process SimulationabstractGenerative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) techniques have recently emerged as promising tools for challenges in Process Mining such as missing data, small datasets, and the generation of complex what-if scenarios. A major limitation of current approaches is their inability to produce sets of process traces in a mutually dependent manner. Traces are generated independently, failing to reflect crucial process-level phenomena such as concurrency, resource contention, and workload distribution. This limitation significantly reduces the realism and utility of generated logs, yet has received limited attention in the literature. In contrast, Business Process Simulation (BPS) excels at preserving process constraints and interdependencies. However, in the presence of specific or complex what-if scenarios, this requires the adjustment of several simulation parameters, which can be challenging to achieve. Motivated by these issues, where generative methods lack consistency and BPS methods lack flexibility, we propose a novel data generation framework combining GenAI with BPS. The proposed approach enables generating diverse and complex whatif scenarios via data-driven generative models, which are then validated and refined through BPS to ensure consistency and feasibility at the log level. We call the approach What-If Scenarios via Data-driven generative mOdels and siMulation (WISDOM). We compare several existing methods for process data generation and assess their outputs using an established evaluation framework. Results show that while generative methods fail to capture the full intricacies of process behaviour, their integration with BPS produces traces that are both diverse and compliant with process constraints. This hybrid approach addresses a critical gap in the literature and opens new avenues for robust, simulation-grounded generation methods in process mining. Andrei Buliga 0001, Francesca Meneghello 0002, Riccardo Graziosi, Massimiliano Ronzani |
ICPM | 3 |
| 2024 | Generating the Traces You Need: A Conditional Generative Model for Process Mining DataabstractIn recent years, trace generation has emerged as a significant challenge within the Process Mining community. Deep Learning (DL) models have demonstrated accuracy in reproducing the features of the selected processes. However, current DL generative models are limited in their ability to adapt the learned distributions to generate data samples based on specific conditions or attributes. This limitation is particularly significant because the ability to control the type of generated data can be beneficial in various contexts, enabling a focus on specific behaviours, exploration of infrequent patterns, or simulation of alternative "what-if" scenarios.In this work, we address this challenge by introducing a conditional model for process data generation based on a conditional variational autoencoder (CVAE). Conditional models offer control over the generation process by tuning input conditional variables, enabling more targeted and controlled data generation. Unlike other domains, CVAE for process mining faces specific challenges due to the multiperspective nature of the data and the need to adhere to control-flow rules while ensuring data variability. Specifically, we focus on generating process executions conditioned on control flow and temporal features of the trace, allowing us to produce traces for specific, identified sub-processes. The generated traces are then evaluated using common metrics for generative model assessment, along with additional metrics to evaluate the quality of the conditional generation. Riccardo Graziosi, Massimiliano Ronzani, Andrei Buliga 0001, Chiara Di Francescomarino, Francesco Folino, Chiara Ghidini, Francesca Meneghello 0002, Luigi Pontieri |
ICPM | 1 |