VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Faridoun Mehri
dblp:386/9688
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Trustworthy machine learning · 91% Deep learning architectures and training · 9% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability
attribution methods |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | LibraGrad: Balancing Gradient Flow for Universally Better Vision Transformer Attributions · CVPR 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability › attribution methods
gradient-based attribution |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | LibraGrad: Balancing Gradient Flow for Universally Better Vision Transformer Attributions · CVPR 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | LibraGrad: Balancing Gradient Flow for Universally Better Vision Transformer Attributions · CVPR 2025 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › transformer
vision transformer |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | LibraGrad: Balancing Gradient Flow for Universally Better Vision Transformer Attributions · CVPR 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
gradient pruning · 0.9backward path scaling · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | LibraGrad: Balancing Gradient Flow for Universally Better Vision Transformer AttributionsabstractWhy do gradient-based explanations struggle with Transformers, and how can we improve them? We identify gradientflow imbalances in Transformers that violate FullGradcompleteness, a critical property for attribution faithfulness that CNNs naturally possess. To address this issue, we introduce LibraGrad—a theoretically grounded post-hoc approach that corrects gradient imbalances through pruning and scaling of backward paths, without changing the forward pass or adding computational overhead. We evaluate LibraGrad using three metric families: Faithfulness, which quantifies prediction changes under perturbations of the most and least relevant features; Completeness Error, which measures attribution conservation relative to model outputs; and Segmentation AP, which assesses alignment with human perception. Extensive experiments across 8 architectures, 4 model sizes, and 5 datasets show that LibraGrad universally enhances gradient-based methods, outperforming existing white-box methods—including Transformer-specific approaches—across all metrics. We demonstrate superior qualitative results through two complementary evaluations: precise text-prompted region highlighting on CLIP models and accurate class discrimination between co-occurring animals on ImageNet-finetuned models—two settings on which existing methods often struggle. Libra-Grad is effective even on the attention-free MLP-Mixer architecture, indicating potential for extension to other modern architectures. Our code is freely available at https://nightmachinery.github.io/LibraGrad/. Faridoun Mehri, Mahdieh Soleymani Baghshah, Mohammad Taher Pilehvar |
CVPR | 1 |