VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Jaidev Shah
dblp:387/0892
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
0009-0004-7746-3000ORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Information retrieval · 56% Recommender systems · 44% |
Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Recommender systems › large-scale recommendation › multi-stage recommender systems
candidate generation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Towards Web-scale Recommendations with LLMs: From Quality-aware Ranking to Candidate Generation · KDD (1) 2025 |
Recommender systems
large-scale recommendation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Towards Web-scale Recommendations with LLMs: From Quality-aware Ranking to Candidate Generation · KDD (1) 2025 |
Information retrieval › ranking › multi-objective ranking
quality-aware ranking |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Towards Web-scale Recommendations with LLMs: From Quality-aware Ranking to Candidate Generation · KDD (1) 2025 |
Information retrieval
ranking |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Towards Web-scale Recommendations with LLMs: From Quality-aware Ranking to Candidate Generation · KDD (1) 2025 |
Information retrieval
search engines |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Towards Web-scale Recommendations with LLMs: From Quality-aware Ranking to Candidate Generation · KDD (1) 2025 |
Information retrieval
web search |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Towards Web-scale Recommendations with LLMs: From Quality-aware Ranking to Candidate Generation · KDD (1) 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
large language model · 0.9RecoDCG · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Towards Web-scale Recommendations with LLMs: From Quality-aware Ranking to Candidate GenerationabstractExplore Further @ Bing is a webpage-to-webpage recommendation product, enhancing the search experience on Bing by surfacing engaging webpage recommendations tied to the search result URLs. In this paper, we present our approach for leveraging Large Language Models (LLMs) for enhancing our web-scale recommendation system. We describe the development and validation of our LLM-powered recommendation quality metric RecoDCG. We discuss our core techniques for utilizing LLMs to make our ranking stage quality-aware. Furthermore, we detail Q' recall, a recall path that enhances our system's candidate generation stage by leveraging LLMs to produce complementary and engaging recommendation candidates. We also address how we optimize our system for multiple objectives, balancing recommendation quality with click metrics. We deploy our work to production, achieving a significant improvement in recommendation quality. We share results from offline and online experiments as well as insights and steps we took to ensure our approaches scale effectively for our web-scale needs. Jaidev Shah, Iman Barjasteh, Amey Barapatre, Rana Forsati, Xue Deng, Blake Shepard, Ronak Shah, Linjun Yang |
KDD (1) | 1 |
| 2024 | Analyzing User Preferences and Quality Improvement on Bing's WebPage Recommendation Experience with Large Language ModelsabstractExplore Further @ Bing (Web Recommendations) is a web-scale query independent webpage-to-webpage recommendation system with an index size of over 200 billion webpages. Due to the significant variability in webpage quality across the web and the reliance of our system on learning soleley user behavior (clicks), our production system was susceptible to serving clickbait and low-quality recommendations. Our team invested several months in developing and shipping several improvements that utilize LLM-generated recommendation quality labels to enhance our ranking stack to improve the nature of the recommendations we show to our users. Another key motivation behind our efforts was to go beyond merely surfacing relevant webpages, focusing instead on prioritizing more useful and authoritative content that delivers value to users based on their implied intent. We demonstrate how large language models (LLMs) offer a powerful tool for product teams to gain deeper insights into shifts in product experience and user behavior following significant improvements or changes to a production system. In this work, to enable our analysis, we also showcase the use of a small language model (SLM) to generate better-quality webpage text features and summaries at scale and describe our approach to mitigating position bias in user interaction logs." Jaidev Shah, Jialin Liu 0007, Amey Barapatre, Chuck Wang |
RecSys | 1 |