Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Andrés Guzmán-Cordero
dblp:387/3049
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Generative modeling · 46% Optimization for machine learning · 23% Deep learning architectures and training · 23% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Generative modeling
flow matching |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Exponential Family Variational Flow Matching for Tabular Data Generation · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › gradient-based optimization › gradient descent
natural gradient descent |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Improving Energy Natural Gradient Descent through Woodbury, Momentum, and Randomization · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
physics-informed neural network |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Improving Energy Natural Gradient Descent through Woodbury, Momentum, and Randomization · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model
tabular data generation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Exponential Family Variational Flow Matching for Tabular Data Generation · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference
exponential family |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Exponential Family Variational Flow Matching for Tabular Data Generation · ICML 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
woodbury formula · 0.9subsampled projected-increment natural gradient descent · 0.9randomized algorithms · 0.9momentum · 0.9moment matching · 0.9bregman divergence · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Exponential Family Variational Flow Matching for Tabular Data GenerationabstractWhile denoising diffusion and flow matching have driven major advances in generative modeling, their application to tabular data remains limited, despite its ubiquity in real-world applications.
To this end, we develop *TabbyFlow*, a variational Flow Matching (VFM) method for tabular data generation.
To apply VFM to data with mixed continuous and discrete features, we introduce **Exponential Family Variational Flow Matching (EF-VFM)**, which represents heterogeneous data types using a general exponential family distribution.
We hereby obtain an efficient, data-driven objective based on moment matching, enabling principled learning of probability paths over mixed continuous and discrete variables.
We also establish a connection between variational flow matching and generalized flow matching objectives based on Bregman divergences.
Evaluation on tabular data benchmarks demonstrates state-of-the-art performance compared to baselines. Andrés Guzmán-Cordero, Floor Eijkelboom, Jan-Willem van de Meent |
ICML | 1 |
| 2025 | Improving Energy Natural Gradient Descent through Woodbury, Momentum, and RandomizationabstractNatural gradient methods significantly accelerate the training of Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs), but are often prohibitively costly. We introduce a suite of techniques to improve the accuracy and efficiency of energy natural gradient descent (ENGD) for PINNs. First, we leverage the Woodbury formula to dramatically reduce the computational complexity of ENGD. Second, we adapt the Subsampled Projected-Increment Natural Gradient Descent algorithm from the variational Monte Carlo literature to accelerate the convergence. Third, we explore the use of randomized algorithms to further reduce the computational cost in the case of large batch sizes. We find that randomization accelerates progress in the early stages of training for low-dimensional problems, and we identify key barriers to attaining acceleration in other scenarios. Our numerical experiments demonstrate that our methods outperform previous approaches, achieving the same $L^2$ error as the original ENGD up to $75\times$ faster. Andrés Guzmán-Cordero, Felix Dangel, Gil Goldshlager, Marius Zeinhofer |
NeurIPS | 1 |