VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Sangmitra Madhusudan
dblp:387/8070
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
2as first author
3since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 2 first-author · 3 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Knowledge representation and reasoning · 50% Trustworthy machine learning · 44% Language models and text generation · 6% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
commonsense reasoning |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Common to Whom? Regional Cultural Commonsense and LLM Bias in India · ACL (1) 2026 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › commonsense reasoning
cultural commonsense |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Common to Whom? Regional Cultural Commonsense and LLM Bias in India · ACL (1) 2026 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
fairness |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Common to Whom? Regional Cultural Commonsense and LLM Bias in India · ACL (1) 2026 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › fairness
bias evaluation |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | STOP! Benchmarking Large Language Models with Sensitivity Testing on Offensive Progressions · EMNLP 2024 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
large language model evaluation |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | STOP! Benchmarking Large Language Models with Sensitivity Testing on Offensive Progressions · EMNLP 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
large language model · 1.0sensitivity testing · 0.8benchmark construction · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Common to Whom? Regional Cultural Commonsense and LLM Bias in IndiaabstractSangmitra Madhusudan, Trush Shashank More, Steph Buongiorno, Renata Dividino, Jad Kabbara, Ali Emami. Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2026. Sangmitra Madhusudan, Trush Shashank More, Steph Buongiorno, Renata Queiroz Dividino, Jad Kabbara, Ali Emami |
ACL (1) | 1 |
| 2025 | Fine-Tuned LLMs are "Time Capsules" for Tracking Societal Bias Through BooksabstractSangmitra Madhusudan, Robert Morabito, Skye Reid, Nikta Gohari Sadr, Ali Emami. Proceedings of the 2025 Conference of the Nations of the Americas Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2025. Sangmitra Madhusudan, Robert Morabito, Skye Reid, Nikta Gohari Sadr, Ali Emami |
NAACL (Long Papers) | 1 |
| 2024 | STOP! Benchmarking Large Language Models with Sensitivity Testing on Offensive ProgressionsabstractMitigating explicit and implicit biases in Large Language Models (LLMs) has become a critical focus in the field of natural language processing.However, many current methodologies evaluate scenarios in isolation, without considering the broader context or the spectrum of potential biases within each situation.To address this, we introduce the Sensitivity Testing on Offensive Progressions (STOP) dataset, which includes 450 offensive progressions containing 2,700 unique sentences of varying severity that progressively escalate from less to more explicitly offensive.Covering a broad spectrum of 9 demographics and 46 sub-demographics, STOP ensures inclusivity and comprehensive coverage.We evaluate several leading closed-and open-source models, including GPT-4, Mixtral, and Llama 3. Our findings reveal that even the best-performing models detect bias inconsistently, with success rates ranging from 19.3% to 69.8%.We also demonstrate how aligning models with human judgments on STOP can improve model answer rates on sensitive tasks such as BBQ, StereoSet, and CrowS-Pairs by up to 191%, while maintaining or even improving performance.STOP presents a novel framework for assessing the complex nature of biases in LLMs, which will enable more effective bias mitigation strategies and facilitates the creation of fairer language models. Robert Morabito, Sangmitra Madhusudan, Tyler McDonald, Ali Emami |
EMNLP | 2 |