Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Maximilian Li
dblp:388/7830
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Trustworthy machine learning · 53% Language models and text generation · 47% | |
| Network and information security
1 paper |
Security and privacy of machine learning · 100% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
large language model safety |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Endless Jailbreaks with Bijection Learning · ICLR 2025 |
Security and privacy of machine learning
adversarial attack |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Endless Jailbreaks with Bijection Learning · ICLR 2025 |
Security and privacy of machine learning › adversarial attack
jailbreak attack |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Endless Jailbreaks with Bijection Learning · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Optimal ablation for interpretability · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability › mechanistic interpretability
circuit discovery |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Optimal ablation for interpretability · NeurIPS 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
in-context learning · 1.7bijection learning · 1.7optimal ablation · 0.8ablation · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Endless Jailbreaks with Bijection LearningabstractDespite extensive safety measures, LLMs are vulnerable to adversarial inputs, or jailbreaks, which can elicit unsafe behaviors. In this work, we introduce bijection learning, a powerful attack algorithm which automatically fuzzes LLMs for safety vulnerabilities using randomly-generated encodings whose complexity can be tightly controlled. We leverage in-context learning to teach models bijective encodings, pass encoded queries to the model to bypass built-in safety mechanisms, and finally decode responses back into English. Our attack is extremely effective on a wide range of frontier language models. By controlling complexity parameters such as number of key-value mappings in the encodings, we find a close relationship between the capability level of the attacked LLM and the average complexity of the most effective bijection attacks. Our work highlights that new vulnerabilities in frontier models can emerge with scale: more capable models are more severely jailbroken by bijection attacks. Brian R. Y. Huang, Maximilian Li, Leonard Tang |
ICLR | 2 |
| 2024 | Optimal ablation for interpretabilityabstractInterpretability studies often involve tracing the flow of information through machine learning models to identify specific model components that perform relevant computations for tasks of interest. Prior work quantifies the importance of a model component on a particular task by measuring the impact of performing ablation on that component, or simulating model inference with the component disabled.
We propose a new method, optimal ablation (OA), and show that OA-based component importance has theoretical and empirical advantages over measuring importance via other ablation methods. We also show that OA-based component importance can benefit several downstream interpretability tasks, including circuit discovery, localization of factual recall, and latent prediction. Maximilian Li, Lucas Janson |
NeurIPS | 1 |