Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Taisei Yamamoto
dblp:388/8177
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Trustworthy machine learning · 69% Knowledge representation and reasoning · 21% Language models and text generation · 10% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › fairness
bias mitigation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Bias Mitigation or Cultural Commonsense? Evaluating LLMs with a Japanese Dataset · EMNLP 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
fairness |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Bias Mitigation or Cultural Commonsense? Evaluating LLMs with a Japanese Dataset · EMNLP 2025 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
commonsense reasoning |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Bias Mitigation or Cultural Commonsense? Evaluating LLMs with a Japanese Dataset · EMNLP 2025 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › commonsense reasoning
cultural commonsense |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Bias Mitigation or Cultural Commonsense? Evaluating LLMs with a Japanese Dataset · EMNLP 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
large language model evaluation |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Bias Mitigation or Cultural Commonsense? Evaluating LLMs with a Japanese Dataset · EMNLP 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
benchmark construction · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Bias Mitigation or Cultural Commonsense? Evaluating LLMs with a Japanese DatasetabstractLarge language models (LLMs) exhibit social biases, prompting the development of various debiasing methods.However, debiasing methods may degrade the capabilities of LLMs.Previous research has evaluated the impact of bias mitigation primarily through tasks measuring general language understanding, which are often unrelated to social biases.In contrast, cultural commonsense is closely related to social biases, as both are rooted in social norms and values.The impact of bias mitigation on cultural commonsense in LLMs has not been well investigated.Considering this gap, we propose SOBACO (SOcial BiAs and Cultural cOmmonsense benchmark), a Japanese benchmark designed to evaluate social biases and cultural commonsense in LLMs in a unified format.We evaluate several LLMs on SOBACO to examine how debiasing methods affect cultural commonsense in LLMs.Our results reveal that the debiasing methods degrade the performance of the LLMs on the cultural commonsense task (up to 75% accuracy deterioration).These results highlight the importance of developing debiasing methods that consider the trade-off with cultural commonsense to improve fairness and utility of LLMs.Warning: This paper contains examples of social biases that can be offensive. Taisei Yamamoto, Ryoma Kumon, Danushka Bollegala, Hitomi Yanaka |
EMNLP | 1 |