Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Taisei Yamamoto

dblp:388/8177 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Trustworthy machine learning · 69% Knowledge representation and reasoning · 21% Language models and text generation · 10%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › fairness
bias mitigation
0.912025
Bias Mitigation or Cultural Commonsense? Evaluating LLMs with a Japanese Dataset · EMNLP 2025
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
fairness
0.912025
Bias Mitigation or Cultural Commonsense? Evaluating LLMs with a Japanese Dataset · EMNLP 2025
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
commonsense reasoning
0.312025
Bias Mitigation or Cultural Commonsense? Evaluating LLMs with a Japanese Dataset · EMNLP 2025
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › commonsense reasoning
cultural commonsense
0.312025
Bias Mitigation or Cultural Commonsense? Evaluating LLMs with a Japanese Dataset · EMNLP 2025
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
large language model evaluation
0.312025
Bias Mitigation or Cultural Commonsense? Evaluating LLMs with a Japanese Dataset · EMNLP 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

benchmark construction · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Bias Mitigation or Cultural Commonsense? Evaluating LLMs with a Japanese Dataset
abstract
Large language models (LLMs) exhibit social biases, prompting the development of various debiasing methods.However, debiasing methods may degrade the capabilities of LLMs.Previous research has evaluated the impact of bias mitigation primarily through tasks measuring general language understanding, which are often unrelated to social biases.In contrast, cultural commonsense is closely related to social biases, as both are rooted in social norms and values.The impact of bias mitigation on cultural commonsense in LLMs has not been well investigated.Considering this gap, we propose SOBACO (SOcial BiAs and Cultural cOmmonsense benchmark), a Japanese benchmark designed to evaluate social biases and cultural commonsense in LLMs in a unified format.We evaluate several LLMs on SOBACO to examine how debiasing methods affect cultural commonsense in LLMs.Our results reveal that the debiasing methods degrade the performance of the LLMs on the cultural commonsense task (up to 75% accuracy deterioration).These results highlight the importance of developing debiasing methods that consider the trade-off with cultural commonsense to improve fairness and utility of LLMs.Warning: This paper contains examples of social biases that can be offensive.
Taisei Yamamoto, Ryoma Kumon, Danushka Bollegala, Hitomi Yanaka
EMNLP1