Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Christos Perivolaropoulos

dblp:389/2790 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Deep learning architectures and training · 67% Graph learning · 17% Learning theory · 17%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Learning theory
generalization bounds
0.912025
Softmax is not Enough (for Sharp Size Generalisation) · ICML 2025
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
positional encoding
0.912025
Round and Round We Go! What makes Rotary Positional Encodings useful? · ICLR 2025
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › positional encoding
rotary position embedding
0.912025
Round and Round We Go! What makes Rotary Positional Encodings useful? · ICLR 2025
Machine learning › Graph learning › graph neural network › graph neural network generalization
size generalization
0.912025
Softmax is not Enough (for Sharp Size Generalisation) · ICML 2025
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
transformer
0.912025
Round and Round We Go! What makes Rotary Positional Encodings useful? · ICLR 2025
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › attention mechanism
transformer attention
0.912025
Softmax is not Enough (for Sharp Size Generalisation) · ICML 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

theoretical analysis · 0.9mechanistic interpretability · 0.9frequency analysis · 0.9adaptive temperature · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Round and Round We Go! What makes Rotary Positional Encodings useful?
abstract
Positional Encodings (PEs) are a critical component of Transformer-based Large Language Models (LLMs), providing the attention mechanism with important sequence-position information. One of the most popular types of encoding used today in LLMs are Rotary Positional Encodings (RoPE), that rotate the queries and keys based on their relative distance. A common belief is that RoPE is useful because it helps to decay token dependency as relative distance increases. In this work, we argue that this is unlikely to be the core reason. We study the internals of a trained Gemma 7B model to understand how RoPE is being used at a mechanical level. We find that Gemma learns to use RoPE to construct robust `positional' attention patterns by exploiting the highest frequencies. We also find that, in general, Gemma greatly prefers to use the lowest frequencies of RoPE, which we suspect are used to carry semantic information. We mathematically prove interesting behaviours of RoPE and conduct experiments to verify our findings, proposing a modification of RoPE that fixes some highlighted issues and improves performance. We believe that this work represents an interesting step in better understanding PEs in LLMs, which we believe holds crucial value for scaling LLMs to large sizes and context lengths.
Federico Barbero, Alex Vitvitskyi, Christos Perivolaropoulos, Razvan Pascanu, Petar Velickovic
ICLR3
2025 Softmax is not Enough (for Sharp Size Generalisation)
abstract
A key property of reasoning systems is the ability to make sharp decisions on their input data. For contemporary AI systems, a key carrier of sharp behaviour is the softmax function, with its capability to perform differentiable query-key lookups. It is a common belief that the predictive power of networks leveraging softmax arises from "circuits" which sharply perform certain kinds of computations consistently across many diverse inputs. However, for these circuits to be robust, they would need to generalise well to arbitrary valid inputs. In this paper, we dispel this myth: even for tasks as simple as finding the maximum key, any learned circuitry must disperse as the number of items grows at test time. We attribute this to a fundamental limitation of the softmax function to robustly approximate sharp functions with increasing problem size, prove this phenomenon theoretically, and propose adaptive temperature as an ad-hoc technique for improving the sharpness of softmax at inference time.
Petar Velickovic, Christos Perivolaropoulos, Federico Barbero, Razvan Pascanu
ICML2