Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Minwook Bae

dblp:389/4364 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Language models and text generation · 72% Vision and language · 28%
Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper
Multimedia analysis and retrieval · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computer vision › Vision and language
multimodal dialogue
0.912025
Enabling Chatbots with Eyes and Ears: An Immersive Multimodal Conversation System for Dynamic Interactions · ACL (1) 2025
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › writing assistance
Human-AI collaborative writing
0.812024
Collective Critics for Creative Story Generation · EMNLP 2024
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › text generation › story generation
long story generation
0.812024
Collective Critics for Creative Story Generation · EMNLP 2024
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › text generation
story generation
0.812024
Collective Critics for Creative Story Generation · EMNLP 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

multimodal memory retrieval · 1.7large language model critics · 0.8iterative refinement · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Enabling Chatbots with Eyes and Ears: An Immersive Multimodal Conversation System for Dynamic Interactions
abstract
As chatbots continue to evolve toward humanlike, real-world, interactions, multimodality remains an active area of research and exploration.So far, efforts to integrate multimodality into chatbots have primarily focused on image-centric tasks, such as visual dialogue and image-based instructions, placing emphasis on the "eyes" of human perception while neglecting the "ears", namely auditory aspects.Moreover, these studies often center around static interactions that focus on discussing the modality rather than naturally incorporating it into the conversation, which limits the richness of simultaneous, dynamic engagement.Furthermore, while multimodality has been explored in multi-party and multi-session conversations, task-specific constraints have hindered its seamless integration into dynamic, natural conversations.To address these challenges, this study aims to equip chatbots with "eyes and ears" capable of more immersive interactions with humans.As part of this effort, we introduce a new multimodal conversation dataset, Multimodal Multi-Session Multi-Party Conversation (M 3 C), and propose a novel multimodal conversation model featuring multimodal memory retrieval.Our model, trained on the M 3 C, demonstrates the ability to seamlessly engage in long-term conversations with multiple speakers in complex, real-world-like settings, effectively processing visual and auditory inputs to understand and respond appropriately.Human evaluations highlight the model's strong performance in maintaining coherent and dynamic interactions, demonstrating its potential for advanced multimodal conversational agents. 1
Jihyoung Jang, Minwook Bae, Dilek Hakkani-Tür, Hyounghun Kim
ACL (1)2
2024 Collective Critics for Creative Story Generation
abstract
Generating a long story of several thousand words with narrative coherence using Large Language Models (LLMs) has been a challenging task.Previous research has addressed this challenge by proposing different frameworks that create a story plan and generate a long story based on that plan.However, these frameworks have been mainly focusing on maintaining narrative coherence in stories, often overlooking creativity in story planning and the expressiveness of the stories generated from those plans, which are desirable properties to captivate readers' interest.In this paper, we propose Collective Critics for Creative Story Generation framework (CRITICS), which is composed of plan refining stage (CRPLAN) and story generation stage (CRTEXT), to integrate a collective revision mechanism that promotes those properties into long-form story generation process.Specifically, in each stage, a group of LLM critics and one leader collaborate to incrementally refine drafts of plan and story throughout multiple rounds.Extensive human evaluation shows that the CRITICS can significantly enhance story creativity and reader engagement, while also maintaining narrative coherence.Furthermore, the design of the framework allows active participation from human writers in any role within the critique process, enabling interactive human-machine collaboration in story writing. 1
Minwook Bae, Hyounghun Kim
EMNLP1