Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Vineeth Vajipey

dblp:389/6521 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Planning, search and constraint satisfaction · 44% Language models and text generation · 28% Representation and self-supervised learning · 22%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction › planning
agent planning
0.912025
ExACT: Teaching AI Agents to Explore with Reflective-MCTS and Exploratory Learning · ICLR 2025
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › test-time scaling
inference-time search
0.912025
ExACT: Teaching AI Agents to Explore with Reflective-MCTS and Exploratory Learning · ICLR 2025
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction › game tree search
monte carlo tree search
0.912025
ExACT: Teaching AI Agents to Explore with Reflective-MCTS and Exploratory Learning · ICLR 2025
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
self-learning
0.912025
ExACT: Teaching AI Agents to Explore with Reflective-MCTS and Exploratory Learning · ICLR 2025
Computer vision › Vision and language
vision-language model
0.312025
ExACT: Teaching AI Agents to Explore with Reflective-MCTS and Exploratory Learning · ICLR 2025
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › LLM agents
web agents
0.312025
ExACT: Teaching AI Agents to Explore with Reflective-MCTS and Exploratory Learning · ICLR 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

self-learning · 0.9multi-agent debate · 0.9monte carlo tree search · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 ExACT: Teaching AI Agents to Explore with Reflective-MCTS and Exploratory Learning
abstract
Autonomous agents have demonstrated significant potential in automating complex multistep decision-making tasks. However, even state-of-the-art vision-language models (VLMs), such as GPT-4o, still fall short of human-level performance, particularly in intricate web environments and long-horizon planning tasks. To address these limitations, we introduce Reflective Monte Carlo Tree Search (R-MCTS), a novel test-time algorithm designed to enhance the ability of AI agents, e.g., powered by GPT-4o, to explore decision space on the fly. R-MCTS extends traditional MCTS by 1) incorporating contrastive reflection, allowing agents to learn from past interactions and dynamically improve their search efficiency; and 2) using multi-agent debate to provide reliable state evaluation. Moreover, we improve the agent's performance by fine-tuning GPT-4o through self-learning, using R-MCTS generated tree traversals without any human-provided labels. On the challenging VisualWebArena benchmark, our GPT-4o-based R-MCTS agent achieves a 6% to 30% relative improvement across various tasks compared to the previous state-of-the-art. Additionally, we show that the knowledge gained from test-time search can be effectively transferred back to GPT-4o via fine-tuning. The fine-tuned GPT-4o matches 97\% of R-MCTS's performance while reducing compute usage by a factor of four at test time. Furthermore, qualitative results reveal that the fine-tuned GPT-4o model demonstrates the ability to explore the environment, evaluate a state, and backtrack to viable ones when it detects that the current state cannot lead to success. Moreover, our work demonstrates the compute scaling properties in both training - data collection with R-MCTS - and testing time. These results suggest a promising research direction to enhance VLMs' reasoning and planning capabilities for agentic applications via test-time search and self-learning.
Xiao Yu 0011, Baolin Peng, Vineeth Vajipey, Hao Cheng 0002, Michel Galley, Jianfeng Gao 0001, Zhou Yu 0005
ICLR3