Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Vineeth Vajipey
dblp:389/6521
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Planning, search and constraint satisfaction · 44% Language models and text generation · 28% Representation and self-supervised learning · 22% |
Topics — the 6 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction › planning
agent planning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | ExACT: Teaching AI Agents to Explore with Reflective-MCTS and Exploratory Learning · ICLR 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › test-time scaling
inference-time search |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | ExACT: Teaching AI Agents to Explore with Reflective-MCTS and Exploratory Learning · ICLR 2025 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction › game tree search
monte carlo tree search |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | ExACT: Teaching AI Agents to Explore with Reflective-MCTS and Exploratory Learning · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
self-learning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | ExACT: Teaching AI Agents to Explore with Reflective-MCTS and Exploratory Learning · ICLR 2025 |
Computer vision › Vision and language
vision-language model |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | ExACT: Teaching AI Agents to Explore with Reflective-MCTS and Exploratory Learning · ICLR 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › LLM agents
web agents |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | ExACT: Teaching AI Agents to Explore with Reflective-MCTS and Exploratory Learning · ICLR 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
self-learning · 0.9multi-agent debate · 0.9monte carlo tree search · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | ExACT: Teaching AI Agents to Explore with Reflective-MCTS and Exploratory LearningabstractAutonomous agents have demonstrated significant potential in automating complex multistep decision-making tasks. However, even state-of-the-art vision-language models (VLMs), such as GPT-4o, still fall short of human-level performance, particularly in intricate web environments and long-horizon planning tasks. To address these limitations, we introduce Reflective Monte Carlo Tree Search (R-MCTS), a novel test-time algorithm designed to enhance the ability of AI agents, e.g., powered by GPT-4o, to explore decision space on the fly.
R-MCTS extends traditional MCTS by 1) incorporating contrastive reflection, allowing agents to learn from past interactions and dynamically improve their search efficiency; and 2) using multi-agent debate to provide reliable state evaluation. Moreover, we improve the agent's performance by fine-tuning GPT-4o through self-learning, using R-MCTS generated tree traversals without any human-provided labels. On the challenging VisualWebArena benchmark, our GPT-4o-based R-MCTS agent achieves a 6% to 30% relative improvement across various tasks compared to the previous state-of-the-art. Additionally, we show that the knowledge gained from test-time search can be effectively transferred back to GPT-4o via fine-tuning. The fine-tuned GPT-4o matches 97\% of R-MCTS's performance while reducing compute usage by a factor of four at test time. Furthermore, qualitative results reveal that the fine-tuned GPT-4o model demonstrates the ability to explore the environment, evaluate a state, and backtrack to viable ones when it detects that the current state cannot lead to success. Moreover, our work demonstrates the compute scaling properties in both training - data collection with R-MCTS - and testing time. These results suggest a promising research direction to enhance VLMs' reasoning and planning capabilities for agentic applications via test-time search and self-learning. Xiao Yu 0011, Baolin Peng, Vineeth Vajipey, Hao Cheng 0002, Michel Galley, Jianfeng Gao 0001, Zhou Yu 0005 |
ICLR | 3 |