Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Yebon Kim

dblp:389/7157 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
0009-0001-3699-5471ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Hardware reliability and fault tolerance · 87% Hardware accelerators and domain-specific architectures · 13%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Hardware reliability and fault tolerance › software fault tolerance
algorithm-based fault tolerance
0.812024
Maintaining Sanity: Algorithm-based Comprehensive Fault Tolerance for CNNs · DAC 2024
Hardware reliability and fault tolerance › soft errors
soft error resilience
0.812024
Maintaining Sanity: Algorithm-based Comprehensive Fault Tolerance for CNNs · DAC 2024
Hardware accelerators and domain-specific architectures
machine learning accelerator
0.212024
Maintaining Sanity: Algorithm-based Comprehensive Fault Tolerance for CNNs · DAC 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

triple modular redundancy · 0.8hamming code · 0.8checkpointing · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Maintaining Sanity: Algorithm-based Comprehensive Fault Tolerance for CNNs
abstract
As the deployment of neural networks in safety-critical applications proliferates, it becomes imperative that they exhibit consistent and dependable performance amidst hardware malfunctions. Several protection schemes have been proposed to protect neural networks, but they suffer from huge overheads or insufficient fault coverage. This paper presents Maintaining Sanity, a comprehensive and efficient protection technique for CNNs. Maintaining Sanity extends the state-of-the-art algorithm-based fault tolerance for CNN, utilizing hamming codes and checkpointing to correct over 99.6% of critical faults with about 72% runtime overhead and minimal memory overhead compared to traditional triple modular redundancy (TMR) techniques.
Jinhyo Jung, Hwisoo So, Woobin Ko, Sumedh Shridhar Joshi, Yebon Kim, Yohan Ko, Aviral Shrivastava, Kyoungwoo Lee
DAC5