VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Banglong Liu
dblp:389/7172
· DBLP profile ↗
6ranked-venue papers
1as first author
6since 2021 · last 2026
0009-0002-3584-1339ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Systems, architecture and hardware · 3 · 3 since 2021Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Theory of computation · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Theoretical computer science
6 papers |
Mathematical optimization · 53% Automated reasoning and model checking · 47% | |
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Trustworthy machine learning · 45% Reinforcement learning · 45% Motion planning and robot control · 10% |
Topics — the 11 heaviest of 13, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Automated reasoning and model checking › synthesis
barrier certificate synthesis |
1.5 | 2 | 2024 | Polynomial Neural Barrier Certificate Synthesis of Hybrid Systems via Counterexample Guidance · IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 2024 Safe Controller Synthesis for Nonlinear Systems via Reinforcement Learning and PAC Approximation · DAC 2024 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
robustness |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Safe Reinforcement Learning for NN-Controlled Systems With Neural Barrier Certificate Guidance · IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 2026 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
safe reinforcement learning |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Safe Reinforcement Learning for NN-Controlled Systems With Neural Barrier Certificate Guidance · IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 2026 |
Mathematical optimization › sparse optimization
basis selection |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Automated Proof of Polynomial Inequalities via Reinforcement Learning · CVPR 2025 |
Mathematical optimization
linear programming |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Automated Proof of Polynomial Inequalities via Reinforcement Learning · CVPR 2025 |
Mathematical optimization › control theory
lyapunov function synthesis |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Learning-enabled Polynomial Lyapunov Function Synthesis via High-Accuracy Counterexample-Guided Framework · CVPR 2025 |
Mathematical optimization › semidefinite programming
sum-of-squares optimization |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Learning-enabled Polynomial Lyapunov Function Synthesis via High-Accuracy Counterexample-Guided Framework · CVPR 2025 |
Automated reasoning and model checking
hybrid systems verification |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Polynomial Neural Barrier Certificate Synthesis of Hybrid Systems via Counterexample Guidance · IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 2024 |
Automated reasoning and model checking
safety verification |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Polynomial Neural Barrier Certificate Synthesis of Hybrid Systems via Counterexample Guidance · IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 2024 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot control
nonlinear control |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Safe Controller Synthesis for Nonlinear Systems via Reinforcement Learning and PAC Approximation · DAC 2024 |
Program verification
neural network verification |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Polynomial Neural Barrier Certificate Synthesis of Hybrid Systems via Counterexample Guidance · IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
reinforcement learning · 2.4neural network learning · 2.4linear matrix inequality · 2.4sum-of-squares relaxation · 2.0polynomial inclusion · 2.0deep reinforcement learning · 2.0neural barrier certificates · 1.0neural barrier certificate · 1.0krivine basis · 0.9fast fourier transform · 0.9counterexample-guided synthesis · 0.9sum-of-squares optimization · 0.8polynomial surrogate · 0.8counterexample-guided learning · 0.8barrier certificates · 0.8PAC approximation · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Safe Reinforcement Learning for NN-Controlled Systems With Neural Barrier Certificate GuidanceabstractSafe controller synthesis is crucial for safety-critical applications. This paper presents a novel reinforcement learning approach to synthesize safe controllers for NN-controlled systems. The core idea leverages an iterative scheme that combines controller learning with neural barrier certificate (BC) verification, ultimately producing a provably safe deep neural network (DNN) controller with formal safety guarantees. The process begins by pre-training a well-performing DNN controller as an “oracle” via deep reinforcement learning (DRL). To formally verify the safety properties of the closed-loop system under the base controller, we devise a formal verification procedure that approximates the DNN controller using polynomial inclusion, followed by synthesizing neural BCs via sum-of-squares (SOS) relaxation. In cases where the base controller is insufficient to yield a real BC, the current spurious BC is incorporated as an additional penalty term to reshape the RL reward function, guiding the iterative refinement for new controllers. We implement an automated tool, NBCRL, and experimental results demonstrate the benefits of our method in terms of efficiency and scalability even for a nonlinear system with dimension up to 12. Hanrui Zhao, Mengxin Ren, Banglong Liu, Niuniu Qi, Xia Zeng, Zhenbing Zeng, Zhengfeng Yang |
IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. | 3 |
| 2025 | Automated Proof of Polynomial Inequalities via Reinforcement LearningabstractPolynomial inequality proving is fundamental to many mathematical disciplines and finds wide applications in diverse fields. Current traditional algebraic methods are based on searching for a polynomial positive definite representation over a set of basis. However, these methods are limited by truncation degree. To address this issue, this paper proposes an approach based on reinforcement learning to find a Krivine-basis representation for proving polynomial inequalities. Specifically, we formulate the inequality proving problem as a linear programming (LP) problem and encode it as a basis selection problem using reinforcement learning (RL), achieving a non-negative Krivine basis. Moreover, a fast multivariate polynomial multiplication method based on Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) is employed to enhance the efficiency of action space search. Furthermore, we have implemented a tool called APPIRL (Automated Proof of Polynomial Inequalities via Reinforcement Learning). Experimental evaluation on benchmark problems demonstrates the feasibility and effectiveness of our approach. In addition, APPIRL has been successfully applied to solve the maximum stable set problem. Banglong Liu, Niuniu Qi, Xia Zeng, Lydia Dehbi, Zhengfeng Yang |
CVPR | 1 |
| 2025 | Learning-enabled Polynomial Lyapunov Function Synthesis via High-Accuracy Counterexample-Guided FrameworkabstractPolynomial Lyapunov function $\mathcal{V}({\mathbf{x}})$ provides mathematically rigorous that converts stability analysis into efficiently solvable optimization problem. Traditional numerical methods rely on user-defined templates, while emerging neural $\mathcal{V}({\mathbf{x}})$ offer flexibility but exhibit poor generalization yield from naive Square NNs. In this paper, we propose a novel learning-enabled polynomial $\mathcal{V}({\mathbf{x}})$ synthesis approach, where an automated machine learning process guided by goal-oriented sampling to fit candidate $\mathcal{V}({\mathbf{x}})$ which naturally compatible with the sum-of-squares (SOS) soundness verification. The framework is structured as an iterative loop between a Learner and a Verifier, where the Learner trains expressive polynomial $\mathcal{V}({\mathbf{x}})$ network via polynomial expansions, while the Verifier encodes learned candidates with SOS constraints to identify a real $\mathcal{V}({\mathbf{x}})$ by solving LMI feasibility test problems. The entire procedure is driven by a high-accuracy counterexample guidance technique to further enhance efficiency. Experimental results demonstrate that our approach outperforms both SMT-based polynomial neural Lyapunov function synthesis and traditional SOS method. Hanrui Zhao, Niuniu Qi, Mengxin Ren, Banglong Liu, Zhengfeng Yang |
CVPR | 4 |
| 2025 | An iterative scheme of hybrid controller synthesis for nonlinear systems subject to safety constraints
Niuniu Qi, Xia Zeng, Banglong Liu, Zhengfeng Yang, Xiaochao Tang, Chao Peng 0004, Zhenbing Zeng |
Inf. Comput. | 3 |
| 2024 | Safe Controller Synthesis for Nonlinear Systems via Reinforcement Learning and PAC ApproximationabstractController synthesis for nonlinear systems is an important research issue. Deep Neural Network (DNN) control policies obtained through reinforcement learning (RL), though exhibiting good performance in simulations, cannot be applied to safety-critical systems for lack of formal guarantee. To address this, this paper considers fully utilizing the advantages of RL for complex control tasks to obtain a well-performing DNN controller. Then, using PAC (Probably Approximately Correct) techniques, a polynomial surrogate controller with probabilistically controllable approximation error is obtained. Finally, the safety of the control system under the designed polynomial controller is verified using barrier certificate generation. Experiments demonstrate the effectiveness of our method in generating controllers with safety guarantees for systems with high dimensions and degrees. Xia Zeng, Banglong Liu, Zhenbing Zeng, Zhiming Liu 0001, Zhengfeng Yang |
DAC | 2 |
| 2024 | Polynomial Neural Barrier Certificate Synthesis of Hybrid Systems via Counterexample GuidanceabstractThis article presents a novel approach to the safety verification of hybrid systems by synthesizing neural barrier certificates (BCs) via counterexample-guided neural network (NN) learning combined with sum-of-square (SOS)-based verification. We learn more easily verifiable BCs with NN polynomial expansions in a high-accuracy counterexamples guided framework. By leveraging the polynomial candidates yielded from the learning phase, we reformulate the identification of real BCs as convex linear matrix inequality (LMI) feasibility testing problems, instead of directly solving the inherently NP-hard nonconvex bilinear matrix inequality (BMI) problems associated with SOS-based BC generation. Furthermore, we decompose the large SOS verification programming into several manageable subprogrammings. Benefiting from the efficiency and scalability advantages, our approach can synthesize BCs not amenable to existing methods and handle more general hybrid systems. Hanrui Zhao, Banglong Liu, Lydia Dehbi, Huijiao Xie, Zhengfeng Yang, Haifeng Qian |
IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. | 2 |