Banglong Liu

dblp:389/7172 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
6ranked-venue papers
1as first author
6since 2021 · last 2026
0009-0002-3584-1339ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 3 · 3 since 2021Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Theory of computation · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
6 papers
Mathematical optimization · 53% Automated reasoning and model checking · 47%
Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Trustworthy machine learning · 45% Reinforcement learning · 45% Motion planning and robot control · 10%

Topics — the 11 heaviest of 13, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Automated reasoning and model checking › synthesis
barrier certificate synthesis
1.522024
Polynomial Neural Barrier Certificate Synthesis of Hybrid Systems via Counterexample Guidance · IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 2024
Safe Controller Synthesis for Nonlinear Systems via Reinforcement Learning and PAC Approximation · DAC 2024
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
robustness
1.012026
Safe Reinforcement Learning for NN-Controlled Systems With Neural Barrier Certificate Guidance · IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 2026
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
safe reinforcement learning
1.012026
Safe Reinforcement Learning for NN-Controlled Systems With Neural Barrier Certificate Guidance · IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 2026
Mathematical optimization › sparse optimization
basis selection
0.912025
Automated Proof of Polynomial Inequalities via Reinforcement Learning · CVPR 2025
Mathematical optimization
linear programming
0.912025
Automated Proof of Polynomial Inequalities via Reinforcement Learning · CVPR 2025
Mathematical optimization › control theory
lyapunov function synthesis
0.912025
Learning-enabled Polynomial Lyapunov Function Synthesis via High-Accuracy Counterexample-Guided Framework · CVPR 2025
Mathematical optimization › semidefinite programming
sum-of-squares optimization
0.912025
Learning-enabled Polynomial Lyapunov Function Synthesis via High-Accuracy Counterexample-Guided Framework · CVPR 2025
Automated reasoning and model checking
hybrid systems verification
0.812024
Polynomial Neural Barrier Certificate Synthesis of Hybrid Systems via Counterexample Guidance · IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 2024
Automated reasoning and model checking
safety verification
0.812024
Polynomial Neural Barrier Certificate Synthesis of Hybrid Systems via Counterexample Guidance · IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 2024
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot control
nonlinear control
0.212024
Safe Controller Synthesis for Nonlinear Systems via Reinforcement Learning and PAC Approximation · DAC 2024
Program verification
neural network verification
0.212024
Polynomial Neural Barrier Certificate Synthesis of Hybrid Systems via Counterexample Guidance · IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

reinforcement learning · 2.4neural network learning · 2.4linear matrix inequality · 2.4sum-of-squares relaxation · 2.0polynomial inclusion · 2.0deep reinforcement learning · 2.0neural barrier certificates · 1.0neural barrier certificate · 1.0krivine basis · 0.9fast fourier transform · 0.9counterexample-guided synthesis · 0.9sum-of-squares optimization · 0.8polynomial surrogate · 0.8counterexample-guided learning · 0.8barrier certificates · 0.8PAC approximation · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Safe Reinforcement Learning for NN-Controlled Systems With Neural Barrier Certificate Guidance
abstract
Safe controller synthesis is crucial for safety-critical applications. This paper presents a novel reinforcement learning approach to synthesize safe controllers for NN-controlled systems. The core idea leverages an iterative scheme that combines controller learning with neural barrier certificate (BC) verification, ultimately producing a provably safe deep neural network (DNN) controller with formal safety guarantees. The process begins by pre-training a well-performing DNN controller as an “oracle” via deep reinforcement learning (DRL). To formally verify the safety properties of the closed-loop system under the base controller, we devise a formal verification procedure that approximates the DNN controller using polynomial inclusion, followed by synthesizing neural BCs via sum-of-squares (SOS) relaxation. In cases where the base controller is insufficient to yield a real BC, the current spurious BC is incorporated as an additional penalty term to reshape the RL reward function, guiding the iterative refinement for new controllers. We implement an automated tool, NBCRL, and experimental results demonstrate the benefits of our method in terms of efficiency and scalability even for a nonlinear system with dimension up to 12.
Hanrui Zhao, Mengxin Ren, Banglong Liu, Niuniu Qi, Xia Zeng, Zhenbing Zeng, Zhengfeng Yang
IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst.3
2025 Automated Proof of Polynomial Inequalities via Reinforcement Learning
abstract
Polynomial inequality proving is fundamental to many mathematical disciplines and finds wide applications in diverse fields. Current traditional algebraic methods are based on searching for a polynomial positive definite representation over a set of basis. However, these methods are limited by truncation degree. To address this issue, this paper proposes an approach based on reinforcement learning to find a Krivine-basis representation for proving polynomial inequalities. Specifically, we formulate the inequality proving problem as a linear programming (LP) problem and encode it as a basis selection problem using reinforcement learning (RL), achieving a non-negative Krivine basis. Moreover, a fast multivariate polynomial multiplication method based on Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) is employed to enhance the efficiency of action space search. Furthermore, we have implemented a tool called APPIRL (Automated Proof of Polynomial Inequalities via Reinforcement Learning). Experimental evaluation on benchmark problems demonstrates the feasibility and effectiveness of our approach. In addition, APPIRL has been successfully applied to solve the maximum stable set problem.
Banglong Liu, Niuniu Qi, Xia Zeng, Lydia Dehbi, Zhengfeng Yang
CVPR1
2025 Learning-enabled Polynomial Lyapunov Function Synthesis via High-Accuracy Counterexample-Guided Framework
abstract
Polynomial Lyapunov function $\mathcal{V}({\mathbf{x}})$ provides mathematically rigorous that converts stability analysis into efficiently solvable optimization problem. Traditional numerical methods rely on user-defined templates, while emerging neural $\mathcal{V}({\mathbf{x}})$ offer flexibility but exhibit poor generalization yield from naive Square NNs. In this paper, we propose a novel learning-enabled polynomial $\mathcal{V}({\mathbf{x}})$ synthesis approach, where an automated machine learning process guided by goal-oriented sampling to fit candidate $\mathcal{V}({\mathbf{x}})$ which naturally compatible with the sum-of-squares (SOS) soundness verification. The framework is structured as an iterative loop between a Learner and a Verifier, where the Learner trains expressive polynomial $\mathcal{V}({\mathbf{x}})$ network via polynomial expansions, while the Verifier encodes learned candidates with SOS constraints to identify a real $\mathcal{V}({\mathbf{x}})$ by solving LMI feasibility test problems. The entire procedure is driven by a high-accuracy counterexample guidance technique to further enhance efficiency. Experimental results demonstrate that our approach outperforms both SMT-based polynomial neural Lyapunov function synthesis and traditional SOS method.
Hanrui Zhao, Niuniu Qi, Mengxin Ren, Banglong Liu, Zhengfeng Yang
CVPR4
2025 An iterative scheme of hybrid controller synthesis for nonlinear systems subject to safety constraints
Niuniu Qi, Xia Zeng, Banglong Liu, Zhengfeng Yang, Xiaochao Tang, Chao Peng 0004, Zhenbing Zeng
Inf. Comput.3
2024 Safe Controller Synthesis for Nonlinear Systems via Reinforcement Learning and PAC Approximation
abstract
Controller synthesis for nonlinear systems is an important research issue. Deep Neural Network (DNN) control policies obtained through reinforcement learning (RL), though exhibiting good performance in simulations, cannot be applied to safety-critical systems for lack of formal guarantee. To address this, this paper considers fully utilizing the advantages of RL for complex control tasks to obtain a well-performing DNN controller. Then, using PAC (Probably Approximately Correct) techniques, a polynomial surrogate controller with probabilistically controllable approximation error is obtained. Finally, the safety of the control system under the designed polynomial controller is verified using barrier certificate generation. Experiments demonstrate the effectiveness of our method in generating controllers with safety guarantees for systems with high dimensions and degrees.
Xia Zeng, Banglong Liu, Zhenbing Zeng, Zhiming Liu 0001, Zhengfeng Yang
DAC2
2024 Polynomial Neural Barrier Certificate Synthesis of Hybrid Systems via Counterexample Guidance
abstract
This article presents a novel approach to the safety verification of hybrid systems by synthesizing neural barrier certificates (BCs) via counterexample-guided neural network (NN) learning combined with sum-of-square (SOS)-based verification. We learn more easily verifiable BCs with NN polynomial expansions in a high-accuracy counterexamples guided framework. By leveraging the polynomial candidates yielded from the learning phase, we reformulate the identification of real BCs as convex linear matrix inequality (LMI) feasibility testing problems, instead of directly solving the inherently NP-hard nonconvex bilinear matrix inequality (BMI) problems associated with SOS-based BC generation. Furthermore, we decompose the large SOS verification programming into several manageable subprogrammings. Benefiting from the efficiency and scalability advantages, our approach can synthesize BCs not amenable to existing methods and handle more general hybrid systems.
Hanrui Zhao, Banglong Liu, Lydia Dehbi, Huijiao Xie, Zhengfeng Yang, Haifeng Qian
IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst.2