The fusion of language models (LMs) and knowledge graphs (KGs) is widely used in commonsense question answering, but generating faithful explanations remains challenging.Current methods often overlook path decoding faithfulness, leading to divergence between graph encoder outputs and model predictions.We identify confounding effects and LM-KG misalignment as key factors causing spurious explanations.To address this, we introduce the LM-KG Fidelity metric to assess KG representation reliability and propose the LM-KG Distribution-aware Alignment (LKDA) algorithm to improve explanation faithfulness.Without ground truth, we evaluate KG explanations using the proposed Fidelity-Sparsity Trade-off Curve.Experiments on Common-senseQA and OpenBookQA show that LKDA significantly enhances explanation fidelity and model performance, highlighting the need to address distributional misalignment for reliable commonsense reasoning.