Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Yoshikazu Terada

dblp:39/10859 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
7ranked-venue papers
3as first author
3since 2021 · last 2026
0000-0002-4509-1108ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 7 · 3 first-author · 3 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Data mining · 100%
Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Kernel, tree and ensemble methods · 80% Representation and self-supervised learning · 20%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Computational geometry · 100%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods › kernel methods › kernel machines
kernel clustering
0.412019
Kernel Normalized Cut: a Theoretical Revisit · ICML 2019
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods
kernel methods
0.412019
Kernel Normalized Cut: a Theoretical Revisit · ICML 2019
Data mining
clustering
0.412019
Kernel Normalized Cut: a Theoretical Revisit · ICML 2019
Data mining › clustering › spectral clustering
normalized cut
0.412019
Kernel Normalized Cut: a Theoretical Revisit · ICML 2019
Data mining › clustering
spectral clustering
0.412019
Kernel Normalized Cut: a Theoretical Revisit · ICML 2019
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › metric learning
ordinal embedding
0.212014
Local Ordinal Embedding · ICML 2014
Computational geometry
graph drawing
0.212014
Local Ordinal Embedding · ICML 2014

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

reproducing kernel hilbert space · 0.8k-means · 0.8soft ordinal embedding · 0.4local ordinal embedding · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Corrigendum to "Sparse kernel k -means for high-dimensional data" Pattern Recognition 144 (2023) 109873
Yoshikazu Terada
Pattern Recognit.2
2023 Sparse kernel k-means for high-dimensional data
Yoshikazu Terada
Pattern Recognit.2
2021 Dynamic visualization for L1 fusion convex clustering in near-linear time
abstract
Convex clustering has drawn recent attention because of its competitive performance and nice property to guarantee global optimality. However, convex clustering is infeasible due to its high computational cost for large-scale data sets. We propose a novel method to solve the L1 fusion convex clustering problem by dynamic programming. We develop the Convex clustering Path Algorithm In Near-linear Time (C-PAINT) algorithm to construct the solution path efficiently. The proposed C-PAINT yields the exact solution while other general solvers for convex problems applied in the convex clustering depend on tuning parameters such as step size and threshold, and it usually takes many iterations to converge. Including a sorting process that almost takes no time in practice, the main part of the algorithm takes only linear time. Thus, C-PAINT has superior scalability comparing to other state-of-art algorithms. Moreover, C-PAINT enables the path visualization of clustering solutions for large data. In particular, experiments show our proposed method can solve the convex clustering with 10^7 data points in two minutes. We demonstrate the proposed method using both synthetic data and real data. Our algorithms are implemented in the dpcc R package.
Yoshikazu Terada
UAI3
2020 More Powerful Selective Kernel Tests for Feature Selection
abstract
Refining one’s hypotheses in light of data is a commonplace scientific practice, however,this approach introduces selection bias and can lead to specious statisticalanalysis.One approach of addressing this phenomena is via conditioning on the selection procedure, i.e., how we have used the data to generate our hypotheses, and prevents information to be used again after selection.Many selective inference (a.k.a. post-selection inference) algorithms typically take this approach but will “over-condition”for sake of tractability. While this practice obtains well calibrated $p$-values,it can incur a major loss in power. In our work, we extend two recent proposals for selecting features using the Maximum Mean Discrepancyand Hilbert Schmidt Independence Criterion to condition on the minimalconditioning event. We show how recent advances inmultiscale bootstrap makesthis possible and demonstrate our proposal over a range of synthetic and real world experiments.Our results show that our proposed test is indeed more powerful in most scenarios.
Jen Ning Lim, Makoto Yamada, Wittawat Jitkrittum, Yoshikazu Terada, Shigeyuki Matsui, Hidetoshi Shimodaira
AISTATS4
2020 Fast generalization error bound of deep learning without scale invariance of activation functions
Yoshikazu Terada, Ryoma Hirose
Neural Networks1
2019 Kernel Normalized Cut: a Theoretical Revisit
abstract
In this paper, we study the theoretical properties of clustering based on the kernel normalized cut. Our first contribution is to derive a nonasymptotic upper bound on the expected distortion rate of the kernel normalized cut. From this result, we show that the solution of the kernel normalized cut converges to that of the population-level weighted k-means clustering on a certain reproducing kernel Hilbert space (RKHS). Our second contribution is the discover of the interesting fact that the population-level weighted k-means clustering in the RKHS is equivalent to the population-level normalized cut. Combining these results, we can see that the kernel normalized cut converges to the population-level normalized cut. The criterion of the population-level normalized cut can be considered as an indivisibility of the population distribution, and this criterion plays an important role in the theoretical analysis of spectral clustering in Schiebinger et al. (2015). We believe that our results will provide deep insights into the behavior of both normalized cut and spectral clustering.
Yoshikazu Terada, Michio Yamamoto
ICML1
2014 Local Ordinal Embedding
abstract
We study the problem of ordinal embedding: given a set of ordinal constraints of the form distance(i,j) < distance(k,l) for some_quadruples (i,j,k,l) of indices, the goal is to construct a point configuration \hat\bmx_1, ..., \hat\bmx_n in \R^p that preserves these constraints as well as possible. Our first contribution is to suggest a simple new algorithm for this problem, Soft Ordinal Embedding. The key feature of the algorithm is that it recovers not only the ordinal constraints, but even the density structure of the underlying data set. As our second contribution we prove that in the large sample limit it is enough to know “local ordinal information” in order to perfectly reconstruct a given point configuration. This leads to our Local Ordinal Embedding algorithm, which can also be used for graph drawing.
Yoshikazu Terada, Ulrike von Luxburg
ICML1