Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Edward W. Thompson

dblp:39/1222 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
6ranked-venue papers
4as first author
0since 2021 · last 1980
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 6 · 4 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
6 papers
Electronic design automation · 100%
Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Programming languages and type systems · 100%

Topics — the 9 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Electronic design automation › hardware simulation
digital simulation
0.031980
The incorporation of functional level element routines into an existing digital simulation system · DAC 1980
Three levels of accuracy for the simulation of different fault types in digital systems · DAC 1975
The software engineering technique of data hiding as applied to multi-level model implementation of logical devices in digital simulation · DAC 1975
Electronic design automation › hardware verification and test
fault simulation
0.031980
An accurate functional level concurrent fault simulator · DAC 1980
Three levels of accuracy for the simulation of different fault types in digital systems · DAC 1975
Modeling and Digital Simulation for Design Verification and Diagnosis · IEEE Trans. Computers 1976
Electronic design automation › hardware verification and test
hardware verification
0.031980
Modeling and Digital Simulation for Design Verification and Diagnosis · IEEE Trans. Computers 1976
A module interface specification language · DAC 1975
The incorporation of functional level element routines into an existing digital simulation system · DAC 1980
Electronic design automation › hardware verification and test › fault simulation
concurrent fault simulation
0.011980
An accurate functional level concurrent fault simulator · DAC 1980
Electronic design automation
hardware verification and test
0.011980
An accurate functional level concurrent fault simulator · DAC 1980
Electronic design automation › hardware verification and test
logic simulation
0.021980
Modeling and Digital Simulation for Design Verification and Diagnosis · IEEE Trans. Computers 1976
The incorporation of functional level element routines into an existing digital simulation system · DAC 1980
Electronic design automation › system-level design
module interface
0.011975
A module interface specification language · DAC 1975
Electronic design automation › hardware simulation
functional simulation
0.011980
An accurate functional level concurrent fault simulator · DAC 1980
Programming languages and type systems
specification language
0.011975
A module interface specification language · DAC 1975

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

concurrent fault simulation · 0.0timing analysis · 0.0register transfer simulation · 0.0digital simulation · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1980 The incorporation of functional level element routines into an existing digital simulation system
abstract
CC-TEGAS3 is a digital logic simulation system containing subsystems which can perform three different modes of simulation. These modes are used for logic or design verification, worst case timing analysis, and fault simulation. The basic device models are for Boolean gates, a wide range of flip-flops and latches, and a number of MOS elements such as transfer gates. A comprehensive list of functional level device models were incorporated into the system and the resulting system is called CC-TEGAS4. This approach was considered advantageous for today's technology, and an absolute necessity for the LSI and VLSI technologies that are forthcoming. This paper is concerned with the problems encountered and some of the techniques used to implement these functional level models, and results obtained in terms of reduction in required computer resources needed to simulate a network utilizing these new models.
Edward W. Thompson, Patrick G. Karger, W. R. Read Jr., Don Ross, Richard von Blucher
DAC1
1980 An accurate functional level concurrent fault simulator
abstract
This paper describes the basic data structures and algorithms for a functional level fault simulator. The technique used is that of concurrent fault simulation. The algorithms and data structure support multi-signal value, gate and functional level device models. These algorithms and data structures also support the capability to simulate user defined faults and faults that cause timing violations. In the experimental version of the system, developed at the University of Texas, only classical stuck-at faults and faults that lead to timing discrepancies between the good and the faulty circuit were implemented. Minor additions to the data structures will allow the simulator to process non-classical faults like: (1) memory stuck-at, (2) user defined functional faults, (3) technology dependent shorted signal faults, etc. The accuracy achieved simulating a fault is consistent with the accuracy of the non-fault model.
Manuel A. d'Abreu, Edward W. Thompson
DAC2
1976 Modeling and Digital Simulation for Design Verification and Diagnosis
abstract
There are many activities included under the category of design automation for integrated circuits. Some of these activities include packaging, placement, routing, interactive graphics, device data bases, and digital simulation; for the purpose of logic verification, timing analysis, and diagnostic test verification. One might also include high-level simulation, such as register transfer simulation, for the purpose of initial logic verification. This paper will be oriented towards modeling and implementation questions which arise when one is attempting to implement an extremely accurate digital simulator for the purposes of logic and design verification and fault simulation. Simulators for these purposes are now extremely important and occupy a major role in any design automation system. These systems are also very expensive and therefore the incorrect answers to a variety of questions which arise during the process of developing such simulators can be disastrous. This paper shall attempt to acquaint the reader with questions that have arisen over the years in terms of developing these simulators and what some of the possible answers are, and their respective tradeoffs. Although the successes, and, equally the failures, of many people have contributed to the present state of the art of digital simulators, one particular simulator, the one the authors are most intimately involved with, will be used as a source of detailed examples demonstrating many of the questions to be discussed.
Stephen A. Szygenda, Edward W. Thompson
IEEE Trans. Computers2
1975 A module interface specification language
Edward W. Thompson, Robert F. Bridge
DAC1
1975 The software engineering technique of data hiding as applied to multi-level model implementation of logical devices in digital simulation
Edward W. Thompson, N. Billawala
DAC1
1975 Three levels of accuracy for the simulation of different fault types in digital systems
Edward W. Thompson, Stephen A. Szygenda
DAC1