Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Burkhard Linke

dblp:39/2341 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2011
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology › bioinformatics infrastructure
bioinformatics workflow management
0.112011
Conveyor: a workflow engine for bioinformatic analyses · Bioinform. 2011
Bioinformatics and computational biology › bioinformatics infrastructure
workflow engine
0.112011
Conveyor: a workflow engine for bioinformatic analyses · Bioinform. 2011
Bioinformatics and computational biology › drug discovery
high-throughput screening
0.012011
Conveyor: a workflow engine for bioinformatic analyses · Bioinform. 2011

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

workflow control structures · 0.1concurrent program execution · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2011 Conveyor: a workflow engine for bioinformatic analyses
abstract
MOTIVATION: The rapidly increasing amounts of data available from new high-throughput methods have made data processing without automated pipelines infeasible. As was pointed out in several publications, integration of data and analytic resources into workflow systems provides a solution to this problem, simplifying the task of data analysis. Various applications for defining and running workflows in the field of bioinformatics have been proposed and published, e.g. Galaxy, Mobyle, Taverna, Pegasus or Kepler. One of the main aims of such workflow systems is to enable scientists to focus on analysing their datasets instead of taking care for data management, job management or monitoring the execution of computational tasks. The currently available workflow systems achieve this goal, but fundamentally differ in their way of executing workflows. RESULTS: We have developed the Conveyor software library, a multitiered generic workflow engine for composition, execution and monitoring of complex workflows. It features an open, extensible system architecture and concurrent program execution to exploit resources available on modern multicore CPU hardware. It offers the ability to build complex workflows with branches, loops and other control structures. Two example use cases illustrate the application of the versatile Conveyor engine to common bioinformatics problems. AVAILABILITY: The Conveyor application including client and server are available at http://conveyor.cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de.
Burkhard Linke, Robert Giegerich, Alexander Goesmann
Bioinform.1
2009 EMMA 2 - A MAGE-compliant system for the collaborative analysis and integration of microarray data
abstract
BACKGROUND: Understanding transcriptional regulation by genome-wide microarray studies can contribute to unravel complex relationships between genes. Attempts to standardize the annotation of microarray data include the Minimum Information About a Microarray Experiment (MIAME) recommendations, the MAGE-ML format for data interchange, and the use of controlled vocabularies or ontologies. The existing software systems for microarray data analysis implement the mentioned standards only partially and are often hard to use and extend. Integration of genomic annotation data and other sources of external knowledge using open standards is therefore a key requirement for future integrated analysis systems. RESULTS: The EMMA 2 software has been designed to resolve shortcomings with respect to full MAGE-ML and ontology support and makes use of modern data integration techniques. We present a software system that features comprehensive data analysis functions for spotted arrays, and for the most common synthesized oligo arrays such as Agilent, Affymetrix and NimbleGen. The system is based on the full MAGE object model. Analysis functionality is based on R and Bioconductor packages and can make use of a compute cluster for distributed services. CONCLUSION: Our model-driven approach for automatically implementing a full MAGE object model provides high flexibility and compatibility. Data integration via SOAP-based web-services is advantageous in a distributed client-server environment as the collaborative analysis of microarray data is gaining more and more relevance in international research consortia. The adequacy of the EMMA 2 software design and implementation has been proven by its application in many distributed functional genomics projects. Its scalability makes the current architecture suited for extensions towards future transcriptomics methods based on high-throughput sequencing approaches which have much higher computational requirements than microarrays.
Michael Dondrup, Stefan P. Albaum, Thasso Griebel, Kolja Henckel, Sebastian Jünemann, Tim Kahlke, Christiane K. Kleindt, Helge Küster, Burkhard Linke, Dominik Mertens, Virginie Mittard-Runte, Heiko Neuweger, Kai J. Runte, Andreas Tauch, Felix Tille, Alfred Pühler, Alexander Goesmann
BMC Bioinform.9