Ivan Kadar

dblp:39/4624 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
15ranked-venue papers
6as first author
0since 2021 · last 2016
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 11 · 3 first-authorTheory of computation · 2 · 2 first-authorArtificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Distributed systems · 88% Embedded and real-time systems · 12%
Computer graphics and multimedia
2 papers
Image and video processing · 100%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Distributed systems › distributed data processing
distributed data fusion
0.011997
Distributed Fusion Architectures and Algorithms for Target Tracking · Proc. IEEE 1997
Distributed systems › distributed algorithms
distributed estimation
0.011997
Distributed Fusion Architectures and Algorithms for Target Tracking · Proc. IEEE 1997
Distributed systems
distributed data association
0.011997
Distributed Fusion Architectures and Algorithms for Target Tracking · Proc. IEEE 1997
Embedded and real-time systems
sensor fusion
0.011997
Distributed Fusion Architectures and Algorithms for Target Tracking · Proc. IEEE 1997
Image and video processing
image restoration
0.021980
A Robustized Vector Recursive Stabilizer Algorithm for Image Restoration · Inf. Control. 1980
Robustized estimation and image processing (Ph.D. Thesis abstr.) · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 1977
Algorithms and data structures
recursive algorithms
0.011980
A Robustized Vector Recursive Stabilizer Algorithm for Image Restoration · Inf. Control. 1980
Mathematical optimization › control theory
stabilization
0.011980
A Robustized Vector Recursive Stabilizer Algorithm for Image Restoration · Inf. Control. 1980

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

multiple hypothesis tracking · 0.0joint probabilistic data association · 0.0robust estimation · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2016 Implicit collaboration of intelligent agents through shared goals
Kenneth J. Hintz, Ivan Kadar
FUSION2
2016 Adaptive MaxEnt modeling of distributed decision fusion without knowledge of prior probabilities of local decisions
Ivan Kadar, Kenneth J. Hintz
FUSION1
2015 Improving ORM utilizing implicit collaboration & context sensitive fusion
Kenneth J. Hintz, Ivan Kadar
FUSION2
2010 Issues and challenges in higher level fusion: Threat/impact assessment and intent modeling (a panel summary)
John S. Salerno, Moises Sudit, Shanchieh Jay Yang, George P. Tadda, Ivan Kadar, Jared Holsopple
FUSION5
2009 A geometric feature-aided game theoretic approach to sensor management
Xiaokun Li, Genshe Chen, Erik Blasch, James Patrick, Ivan Kadar
FUSION6
2009 Geometric factors in target positioning and tracking
Erik Blasch, Ivan Kadar
FUSION3
2009 Performance-driven resource management in layered sensing
Ivan Kadar, Erik Blasch
FUSION2
2008 Optimality self online monitoring (OSOM) for performance evaluation and adaptive sensor fusion
Erik Blasch, Ivan Kadar
FUSION3
2007 Resource management and its interaction with level 2/3 fusion from the fusion06 panel discussion
abstract
Sensor Resource Management (or process refinement) is a element of any information fusion system. Common Level 4 sensor management (SM) inter-relations to Level 1 target tracking and identification have been developed in the literature. During Fusion06, a panel discussion was held to explore the challenges and issues pertaining to the interaction between SM and situation and threat assessment. This paper summarizes the key tenants of the discussion to filter vast experiences of the invited panel experts. The common themes were: (1) Addressing the user in system management / control, (2) Determining a standard set of metrics for optimization, (3) Optimizing / evaluating fusion systems to deliver timely information needs, (4) Dynamic updating for planning mission time-horizons, (5) Joint optimization of objective functions at all levels (6) L2/3 situation entity definitions for knowledge discovery, modeling, and information projection (7) Addressing constraints for resource planning and scheduling
Erik Blasch, Ivan Kadar, Kenneth J. Hintz, Joachim Biermann, Chee Chong, John S. Salerno
FUSION2
2007 Results from levels 2/3 fusion implementations: Issues, challenges, retrospectives and perspectives for the future - An annotated view
abstract
This paper serves both as introduction to and motivation for the panel, and as a position paper to highlight retrospectives and perspectives on issues and challenges of levels 2/3 fusion implementations by presenting an independent annotated point of view.
Ivan Kadar
FUSION1
2006 Issues in Adaptive and Automatic Information Fusion Resource Management
abstract
This panel position paper addresses issues and challenges of resource management (facilitating adaptive and automatic information fusion) and identifies the necessary interaction with levels 2 and 3 components of "information fusion". Starting with the definitions of fusion levels, implicit and explicit interactions among the levels are examined from several perspectives: identifying commensurate measures to model interactions; selection of objective functions at each level or globally; representation of optimum decision making under uncertainty; effects of local optimization at each fusion level vs. joint optimization; representation of interactions among fusion levels by the perceptual reasoning machine paradigm-based adaptive anticipatory planning and control model; and identifying research directions
Ivan Kadar
FUSION1
1997 Distributed Fusion Architectures and Algorithms for Target Tracking
abstract
Modern surveillance systems often utilize multiple physically distributed sensors of different types to provide complementary and overlapping coverage on targets. In order to generate target tracks and estimates, the sensor data need to be fused. While a centralized processing approach is theoretically optimal, there are significant advantages in distributing the fusion operations over multiple processing nodes. This paper discusses architectures for distributed fusion, whereby each node processes the data from its own set of sensors and communicates with other nodes to improve on the estimates, The information graph is introduced as a way of modeling information flow in distributed fusion systems and for developing algorithms. Fusion for target tracking involves two main operations: estimation and association. Distributed estimation algorithms based on the information graph are presented for arbitrary fusion architectures and related to linear and nonlinear distributed estimation results. The distributed data association problem is discussed in terms of track-to-track association likelihoods. Distributed versions of two popular tracking approaches (joint probabilistic data association and multiple hypothesis tracking) are then presented, and examples of applications are given.
Martin E. Liggins, Chee-Yee Chong, Ivan Kadar, Mark G. Alford, Vincent Vannicola, Stelios C. A. Thomopoulos
Proc. IEEE3
1980 A Robustized Vector Recursive Stabilizer Algorithm for Image Restoration
Ivan Kadar, Ludwik Kurz
Inf. Control.1
1979 A class of robust edge detectors based on latin squares
Ivan Kadar, Ludwik Kurz
Pattern Recognit.1
1977 Robustized estimation and image processing (Ph.D. Thesis abstr.)
Ivan Kadar
IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory1