Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Sandra E. Orchard

dblp:39/5046 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
14ranked-venue papers
1as first author
3since 2021 · last 2023
0000-0002-8878-3972ORCID · verified

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 14 · 1 first-author · 3 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
10 papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 98% Computational science and engineering · 2%
Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper
Visualization and visual analytics · 100%

Topics — the 17 heaviest of 18, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology › genome annotation
automatic annotation
0.922021
UniRule: a unified rule resource for automatic annotation in the UniProt Knowledgebase · Bioinform. 2021
UniRule: a unified rule resource for automatic annotation in the UniProt Knowledgebase · Bioinform. 2020
Bioinformatics and computational biology
protein function prediction
0.922021
UniRule: a unified rule resource for automatic annotation in the UniProt Knowledgebase · Bioinform. 2021
UniRule: a unified rule resource for automatic annotation in the UniProt Knowledgebase · Bioinform. 2020
Bioinformatics and computational biology › protein analysis › protein bioinformatics
protein annotation
0.722023
Annotation of biologically relevant ligands in UniProtKB using ChEBI · Bioinform. 2023
The Protein Feature Ontology: a tool for the unification of protein feature annotations · Bioinform. 2008
Bioinformatics and computational biology
molecular interaction data
0.512021
The Minimum Information about a Molecular Interaction CAusal STatement (MI2CAST) · Bioinform. 2021
Bioinformatics and computational biology
bioinformatics infrastructure
0.412020
The ELIXIR Core Data Resources: fundamental infrastructure for the life sciences · Bioinform. 2020
Bioinformatics and computational biology › bioinformatics infrastructure
biological data standards
0.412019
CausalTAB: the PSI-MITAB 2.8 updated format for signalling data representation and dissemination · Bioinform. 2019
Bioinformatics and computational biology
systems biology
0.412019
CausalTAB: the PSI-MITAB 2.8 updated format for signalling data representation and dissemination · Bioinform. 2019
Bioinformatics and computational biology › structural bioinformatics
molecular complex visualization
0.312017
ComplexViewer: visualization of curated macromolecular complexes · Bioinform. 2017
Bioinformatics and computational biology
structural bioinformatics
0.312017
ComplexViewer: visualization of curated macromolecular complexes · Bioinform. 2017
Bioinformatics and computational biology
biological data visualization
0.212013
BioJS: an open source JavaScript framework for biological data visualization · Bioinform. 2013
Computational science and engineering
controlled vocabulary
0.122019
CausalTAB: the PSI-MITAB 2.8 updated format for signalling data representation and dissemination · Bioinform. 2019
The Protein Feature Ontology: a tool for the unification of protein feature annotations · Bioinform. 2008
Bioinformatics and computational biology › bioinformatics infrastructure
database interoperability
0.112019
CausalTAB: the PSI-MITAB 2.8 updated format for signalling data representation and dissemination · Bioinform. 2019
Visualization and visual analytics › biological data visualization
biological network visualization
0.112017
ComplexViewer: visualization of curated macromolecular complexes · Bioinform. 2017
Bioinformatics and computational biology › protein analysis › protein-protein interaction
protein-protein interaction network analysis
0.112008
Rintact: enabling computational analysis of molecular interaction data from the IntAct repository · Bioinform. 2008
Bioinformatics and computational biology
software infrastructure
0.012013
BioJS: an open source JavaScript framework for biological data visualization · Bioinform. 2013
Bioinformatics and computational biology › data integration
biological data integration
0.012008
The Protein Feature Ontology: a tool for the unification of protein feature annotations · Bioinform. 2008
Graph data management
graph analytics
0.012008
Rintact: enabling computational analysis of molecular interaction data from the IntAct repository · Bioinform. 2008

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

interpro signatures · 0.9ontology-based annotation · 0.7SPARQL querying · 0.7scalable vector graphics · 0.6d3.js · 0.6checklist development · 0.5javascript · 0.2community-driven specification · 0.2statistical modeling · 0.2graph transformation · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2023 Annotation of biologically relevant ligands in UniProtKB using ChEBI
abstract
MOTIVATION: To provide high quality, computationally tractable annotation of binding sites for biologically relevant (cognate) ligands in UniProtKB using the chemical ontology ChEBI (Chemical Entities of Biological Interest), to better support efforts to study and predict functionally relevant interactions between protein sequences and structures and small molecule ligands. RESULTS: We structured the data model for cognate ligand binding site annotations in UniProtKB and performed a complete reannotation of all cognate ligand binding sites using stable unique identifiers from ChEBI, which we now use as the reference vocabulary for all such annotations. We developed improved search and query facilities for cognate ligands in the UniProt website, REST API and SPARQL endpoint that leverage the chemical structure data, nomenclature and classification that ChEBI provides. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: Binding site annotations for cognate ligands described using ChEBI are available for UniProtKB protein sequence records in several formats (text, XML and RDF) and are freely available to query and download through the UniProt website (www.uniprot.org), REST API (www.uniprot.org/help/api), SPARQL endpoint (sparql.uniprot.org/) and FTP site (https://ftp.uniprot.org/pub/databases/uniprot/). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Elisabeth Coudert, Sebastien Gehant, Edouard De Castro, Monica Pozzato, Delphine Baratin, Teresa Batista Neto, Christian J. A. Sigrist, Nicole Redaschi, Alan J. Bridge, Lucila Aimo, Ghislaine Argoud-Puy, Andrea H. Auchincloss, Kristian B. Axelsen, Parit Bansal, Marie-Claude Blatter, Jerven T. Bolleman, Emmanuel Boutet, Lionel Breuza, Blanca Cabrera Gil, Cristina Casals-Casas, Kamal Chikh Echioukh, Béatrice A. Cuche, Anne Estreicher, Maria Livia Famiglietti, Marc Feuermann, Elisabeth Gasteiger, Pascale Gaudet, Vivienne Baillie Gerritsen, Arnaud Gos, Nadine Gruaz-Gumowski, Chantal Hulo, Nevila Hyka-Nouspikel, Florence Jungo, Arnaud Kerhornou, Philippe Le Mercier, Damien Lieberherr, Patrick Masson, Anne Morgat, Venkatesh Muthukrishnan, Salvo Paesano, Ivo Pedruzzi, Sandrine Pilbout, Lucille Pourcel, Sylvain Poux, Manuela Pruess, Catherine Rivoire, Karin Sonesson, Shyamala Sundaram, Alex Bateman, Maria Jesus Martin, Sandra E. Orchard, Michele Magrane, Shadab Ahmad, Emanuele Alpi, Emily H. Bowler-Barnett, Ramona Britto, Hema Bye-A-Jee, Austra Cukura, Paul Denny 0002, Tunca Dogan, Thankgod Ebenezer, Penelope Garmiri, Leonardo Jose da Costa Gonzales, Emma Hatton-Ellis, Abdulrahman Hussein, Alexandr Ignatchenko, Giuseppe Insana, Rizwan Ishtiaq, Vishal Joshi, Dushyanth Jyothi, Swaathi Kandasamy, Antonia Lock, Aurelien Luciani, Marija Lugaric, Yvonne Lussi, Alistair MacDougall, Fábio Madeira, Mahdi Mahmoudy, Alok Mishra 0004, Katie Moulang, Andrew Nightingale, Sangya Pundir, Guoying Qi, Shriya Raj, Pedro Raposo, Daniel Rice, Rabie Saidi, Elena Speretta, James D. Stephenson, Prabhat Totoo, Edward Turner, Nidhi Tyagi, Preethi Vasudev, Kate Warner, Xavier Watkins, Rossana Zaru, Hermann Zellner, Cathy H. Wu, Cecilia N. Arighi, Leslie Arminski, Chuming Chen, Yongxing Chen, Hongzhan Huang, Kati Laiho, Peter B. McGarvey, Darren A. Natale, Karen E. Ross, C. R. Vinayaka, Qinghua Wang 0003
Bioinform.51
2021 UniRule: a unified rule resource for automatic annotation in the UniProt Knowledgebase
Alistair MacDougall, Vladimir Volynkin, Rabie Saidi, Diego Poggioli, Hermann Zellner, Emma Hatton-Ellis, Vishal Joshi, Claire O'Donovan, Sandra E. Orchard, Andrea H. Auchincloss, Delphine Baratin, Jerven T. Bolleman, Elisabeth Coudert, Edouard De Castro, Chantal Hulo, Patrick Masson, Ivo Pedruzzi, Catherine Rivoire, Cecilia N. Arighi, Qinghua Wang 0003, Chuming Chen, Hongzhan Huang, John S. Garavelli, C. R. Vinayaka, Lai-Su Yeh, Darren A. Natale, Kati Laiho, Maria Jesus Martin, Alexandre Renaux, Klemens Pichler
Bioinform.9
2021 The Minimum Information about a Molecular Interaction CAusal STatement (MI2CAST)
abstract
MOTIVATION: A large variety of molecular interactions occurs between biomolecular components in cells. When a molecular interaction results in a regulatory effect, exerted by one component onto a downstream component, a so-called 'causal interaction' takes place. Causal interactions constitute the building blocks in our understanding of larger regulatory networks in cells. These causal interactions and the biological processes they enable (e.g. gene regulation) need to be described with a careful appreciation of the underlying molecular reactions. A proper description of this information enables archiving, sharing and reuse by humans and for automated computational processing. Various representations of causal relationships between biological components are currently used in a variety of resources. RESULTS: Here, we propose a checklist that accommodates current representations, called the Minimum Information about a Molecular Interaction CAusal STatement (MI2CAST). This checklist defines both the required core information, as well as a comprehensive set of other contextual details valuable to the end user and relevant for reusing and reproducing causal molecular interaction information. The MI2CAST checklist can be used as reporting guidelines when annotating and curating causal statements, while fostering uniformity and interoperability of the data across resources. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The checklist together with examples is accessible at https://github.com/MI2CAST/MI2CAST. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Vasundra Touré, Steven Vercruysse, Marcio Luis Acencio, Ruth C. Lovering, Sandra E. Orchard, Glyn Bradley, Cristina Casals-Casas, Claudine Chaouiya, Noemi del-Toro, Åsmund Flobak, Pascale Gaudet, Henning Hermjakob, Charles Tapley Hoyt, Luana Licata, Astrid Lægreid, Chris Mungall, Anne Niknejad, Simona Panni, Livia Perfetto, Pablo Porras, Dexter Pratt, Julio Saez-Rodriguez, Denis Thieffry, Paul D. Thomas, Dénes Türei, Martin Kuiper
Bioinform.5
2020 The ELIXIR Core Data Resources: fundamental infrastructure for the life sciences
abstract
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Rachel Drysdale, Charles E. Cook, Robert Petryszak, Vivienne Baillie Gerritsen, Mary Barlow, Elisabeth Gasteiger, Franziska Gruhl, Jerry Lanfear, Rodrigo Lopez, Nicole Redaschi, Heinz Stockinger, Daniel Teixeira, Aravind Venkatesan, Alex Bateman, Alan J. Bridge, Guy Cochrane, Robert D. Finn, Frank Oliver Glöckner, Marc Hanauer, Thomas M. Keane, Luana Licata, Per Oksvold, Sandra E. Orchard, Christine A. Orengo, Helen E. Parkinson, Bengt Persson, Pablo Porras, Jordi Rambla De Argila, Ana Rath, Charlotte Rodwell, Ugis Sarkans, Dietmar Schomburg, Ian Sillitoe, J. Dylan Spalding, Mathias Uhlen, Sameer Velankar, Juan Antonio Vizcaíno, Kalle von Feilitzen, Christian von Mering, Andy Yates, Niklas Blomberg, Christine Durinx, Johanna R. McEntyre
Bioinform.25
2020 UniRule: a unified rule resource for automatic annotation in the UniProt Knowledgebase
abstract
MOTIVATION: The number of protein records in the UniProt Knowledgebase (UniProtKB: https://www.uniprot.org) continues to grow rapidly as a result of genome sequencing and the prediction of protein-coding genes. Providing functional annotation for these proteins presents a significant and continuing challenge. RESULTS: In response to this challenge, UniProt has developed a method of annotation, known as UniRule, based on expertly curated rules, which integrates related systems (RuleBase, HAMAP, PIRSR, PIRNR) developed by the members of the UniProt consortium. UniRule uses protein family signatures from InterPro, combined with taxonomic and other constraints, to select sets of reviewed proteins which have common functional properties supported by experimental evidence. This annotation is propagated to unreviewed records in UniProtKB that meet the same selection criteria, most of which do not have (and are never likely to have) experimentally verified functional annotation. Release 2020_01 of UniProtKB contains 6496 UniRule rules which provide annotation for 53 million proteins, accounting for 30% of the 178 million records in UniProtKB. UniRule provides scalable enrichment of annotation in UniProtKB. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: UniRule rules are integrated into UniProtKB and can be viewed at https://www.uniprot.org/unirule/. UniRule rules and the code required to run the rules, are publicly available for researchers who wish to annotate their own sequences. The implementation used to run the rules is known as UniFIRE and is available at https://gitlab.ebi.ac.uk/uniprot-public/unifire.
Alistair MacDougall, Vladimir Volynkin, Rabie Saidi, Diego Poggioli, Hermann Zellner, Emma Hatton-Ellis, Vishal Joshi, Claire O'Donovan, Sandra E. Orchard, Andrea H. Auchincloss, Delphine Baratin, Jerven T. Bolleman, Elisabeth Coudert, Edouard De Castro, Chantal Hulo, Patrick Masson, Ivo Pedruzzi, Catherine Rivoire, Cecilia N. Arighi, Qinghua Wang 0003, Chuming Chen, Hongzhan Huang, John S. Garavelli, C. R. Vinayaka, Lai-Su Yeh, Darren A. Natale, Kati Laiho, Maria Jesus Martin, Alexandre Renaux, Klemens Pichler
Bioinform.9
2019 CausalTAB: the PSI-MITAB 2.8 updated format for signalling data representation and dissemination
abstract
MOTIVATION: Combining multiple layers of information underlying biological complexity into a structured framework represent a challenge in systems biology. A key task is the formalization of such information in models describing how biological entities interact to mediate the response to external and internal signals. Several databases with signalling information, focus on capturing, organizing and displaying signalling interactions by representing them as binary, causal relationships between biological entities. The curation efforts that build these individual databases demand a concerted effort to ensure interoperability among resources. RESULTS: Aware of the enormous benefits of standardization efforts in the molecular interaction research field, representatives of the signalling network community agreed to extend the PSI-MI controlled vocabulary to include additional terms representing aspects of causal interactions. Here, we present a common standard for the representation and dissemination of signalling information: the PSI Causal Interaction tabular format (CausalTAB) which is an extension of the existing PSI-MI tab-delimited format, now designated PSI-MITAB 2.8. We define the new term 'causal interaction', and related child terms, which are children of the PSI-MI 'molecular interaction' term. The new vocabulary terms in this extended PSI-MI format will enable systems biologists to model large-scale signalling networks more precisely and with higher coverage than before. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: PSI-MITAB 2.8 format and the new reference implementation of PSICQUIC are available online (https://psicquic.github.io/ and https://psicquic.github.io/MITAB28Format.html). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Livia Perfetto, Marcio Luis Acencio, Glyn Bradley, Gianni Cesareni, Noemi del-Toro, Dávid Fazekas, Henning Hermjakob, Tamás Korcsmáros, Martin Kuiper, Astrid Lægreid, Prisca Lo Surdo, Ruth C. Lovering, Sandra E. Orchard, Pablo Porras, Paul D. Thomas, Vasundra Touré, John Zobolas, Luana Licata
Bioinform.13
2018 Encompassing new use cases - level 3.0 of the HUPO-PSI format for molecular interactions
abstract
BACKGROUND: Systems biologists study interaction data to understand the behaviour of whole cell systems, and their environment, at a molecular level. In order to effectively achieve this goal, it is critical that researchers have high quality interaction datasets available to them, in a standard data format, and also a suite of tools with which to analyse such data and form experimentally testable hypotheses from them. The PSI-MI XML standard interchange format was initially published in 2004, and expanded in 2007 to enable the download and interchange of molecular interaction data. PSI-XML2.5 was designed to describe experimental data and to date has fulfilled this basic requirement. However, new use cases have arisen that the format cannot properly accommodate. These include data abstracted from more than one publication such as allosteric/cooperative interactions and protein complexes, dynamic interactions and the need to link kinetic and affinity data to specific mutational changes. RESULTS: The Molecular Interaction workgroup of the HUPO-PSI has extended the existing, well-used XML interchange format for molecular interaction data to meet new use cases and enable the capture of new data types, following extensive community consultation. PSI-MI XML3.0 expands the capabilities of the format beyond simple experimental data, with a concomitant update of the tool suite which serves this format. The format has been implemented by key data producers such as the International Molecular Exchange (IMEx) Consortium of protein interaction databases and the Complex Portal. CONCLUSIONS: PSI-MI XML3.0 has been developed by the data producers, data users, tool developers and database providers who constitute the PSI-MI workgroup. This group now actively supports PSI-MI XML2.5 as the main interchange format for experimental data, PSI-MI XML3.0 which additionally handles more complex data types, and the simpler, tab-delimited MITAB2.5, 2.6 and 2.7 for rapid parsing and download.
M. Sivade Dumousseau, Diego Alonso-López, Mais G. Ammari, Glyn Bradley, Nancy H. Campbell, Arnaud Céol, Gianni Cesareni, Colin W. Combe, Javier De Las Rivas, Noemi del-Toro, Joshua Heimbach, Henning Hermjakob, Igor Jurisica, Luana Licata, Ruth C. Lovering, David J. Lynn, Birgit Meldal, Gos Micklem, Simona Panni, Pablo Porras, Sylvie Ricard-Blum, Bernd Roechert, Lukasz Salwínski, Anjali Shrivastava, Julie M. Sullivan, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg, Yo Yehudi, Kim Van Roey, Sandra E. Orchard
BMC Bioinform.30
2018 JAMI: a Java library for molecular interactions and data interoperability
abstract
BACKGROUND: A number of different molecular interactions data download formats now exist, designed to allow access to these valuable data by diverse user groups. These formats include the PSI-XML and MITAB standard interchange formats developed by Molecular Interaction workgroup of the HUPO-PSI in addition to other, use-specific downloads produced by other resources. The onus is currently on the user to ensure that a piece of software is capable of read/writing all necessary versions of each format. This problem may increase, as data providers strive to meet ever more sophisticated user demands and data types. RESULTS: A collaboration between EMBL-EBI and the University of Cambridge has produced JAMI, a single library to unify standard molecular interaction data formats such as PSI-MI XML and PSI-MITAB. The JAMI free, open-source library enables the development of molecular interaction computational tools and pipelines without the need to produce different versions of software to read different versions of the data formats. CONCLUSION: Software and tools developed on top of the JAMI framework are able to integrate and support both PSI-MI XML and PSI-MITAB. The use of JAMI avoids the requirement to chain conversions between formats in order to reach a desired output format and prevents code and unit test duplication as the code becomes more modular. JAMI's model interfaces are abstracted from the underlying format, hiding the complexity and requirements of each data format from developers using JAMI as a library.
M. Sivade Dumousseau, Anjali Shrivastava, Diego Alonso-López, Javier De Las Rivas, Noemi del-Toro, Colin W. Combe, Birgit Meldal, Joshua Heimbach, Juri Rappsilber, Julie M. Sullivan, Yo Yehudi, Sandra E. Orchard
BMC Bioinform.13
2017 ComplexViewer: visualization of curated macromolecular complexes
abstract
SUMMARY: Proteins frequently function as parts of complexes, assemblages of multiple proteins and other biomolecules, yet network visualizations usually only show proteins as parts of binary interactions. ComplexViewer visualizes interactions with more than two participants and thereby avoids the need to first expand these into multiple binary interactions. Furthermore, if binding regions between molecules are known then these can be displayed in the context of the larger complex. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: freely available under Apache version 2 license; EMBL-EBI Complex Portal: http://www.ebi.ac.uk/complexportal; Source code: https://github.com/MICommunity/ComplexViewer; Package: https://www.npmjs.com/package/complexviewer; http://biojs.io/d/complexviewer. Language: JavaScript; Web technology: Scalable Vector Graphics; Libraries: D3.js. CONTACT: [email protected] or [email protected].
Colin W. Combe, Marine Sivade, Henning Hermjakob, Joshua Heimbach, Birgit Meldal, Gos Micklem, Sandra E. Orchard, Juri Rappsilber
Bioinform.7
2015 Development of data representation standards by the human proteome organization proteomics standards initiative
abstract
OBJECTIVE: To describe the goals of the Proteomics Standards Initiative (PSI) of the Human Proteome Organization, the methods that the PSI has employed to create data standards, the resulting output of the PSI, lessons learned from the PSI's evolution, and future directions and synergies for the group. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The PSI has 5 categories of deliverables that have guided the group. These are minimum information guidelines, data formats, controlled vocabularies, resources and software tools, and dissemination activities. These deliverables are produced via the leadership and working group organization of the initiative, driven by frequent workshops and ongoing communication within the working groups. Official standards are subjected to a rigorous document process that includes several levels of peer review prior to release. RESULTS: We have produced and published minimum information guidelines describing what information should be provided when making data public, either via public repositories or other means. The PSI has produced a series of standard formats covering mass spectrometer input, mass spectrometer output, results of informatics analysis (both qualitative and quantitative analyses), reports of molecular interaction data, and gel electrophoresis analyses. We have produced controlled vocabularies that ensure that concepts are uniformly annotated in the formats and engaged in extensive software development and dissemination efforts so that the standards can efficiently be used by the community.Conclusion In its first dozen years of operation, the PSI has produced many standards that have accelerated the field of proteomics by facilitating data exchange and deposition to data repositories. We look to the future to continue developing standards for new proteomics technologies and workflows and mechanisms for integration with other omics data types. Our products facilitate the translation of genomics and proteomics findings to clinical and biological phenotypes. The PSI website can be accessed at http://www.psidev.info.
Eric W. Deutsch, Juan P. Albar, Pierre-Alain Binz, Martin Eisenacher, Andrew R. Jones, Gerhard Mayer, Gilbert S. Omenn, Sandra E. Orchard, Juan Antonio Vizcaíno, Henning Hermjakob
J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc.8
2013 BioJS: an open source JavaScript framework for biological data visualization
abstract
SUMMARY: BioJS is an open-source project whose main objective is the visualization of biological data in JavaScript. BioJS provides an easy-to-use consistent framework for bioinformatics application programmers. It follows a community-driven standard specification that includes a collection of components purposely designed to require a very simple configuration and installation. In addition to the programming framework, BioJS provides a centralized repository of components available for reutilization by the bioinformatics community. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: http://code.google.com/p/biojs/. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
John Gómez, Leyla Jael Castro, Gustavo A. Salazar, Jose M. Villaveces, Swanand P. Gore, Alexander García Castro, Maria Jesus Martin, Guillaume Launay, Rafael Alcántara, Noemi del-Toro, Marine Sivade, Sandra E. Orchard, Sameer Velankar, Henning Hermjakob, Chenggong Zong, Peipei Ping, Manuel Corpas, Rafael C. Jiménez
Bioinform.12
2008 The HUPO proteomics standards initiative - easing communication and minimizing data loss in a changing world
abstract
The amount of data currently being generated by proteomics laboratories around the world is increasing exponentially, making it ever more critical that scientists are able to exchange, compare and retrieve datasets when re-evaluation of their original conclusions becomes important. Only a fraction of this data is published in the literature and important information is being lost every day as data formats become obsolete. The Human Proteome Organisation Proteomics Standards Initiative (HUPO-PSI) was tasked with the creation of data standards and interchange formats to allow both the exchange and storage of such data irrespective of the hardware and software from which it was generated. This article will provide an update on the work of this group, the creation and implementation of these standards and the standards-compliant data repositories being established as result of their efforts.
Sandra E. Orchard, Henning Hermjakob
Briefings Bioinform.1
2008 Rintact: enabling computational analysis of molecular interaction data from the IntAct repository
abstract
MOTIVATION: The IntAct repository is one of the largest and most widely used databases for the curation and storage of molecular interaction data. These datasets need to be analyzed by computational methods. Software packages in the statistical environment R provide powerful tools for conducting such analyses. RESULTS: We introduce Rintact, a Bioconductor package that allows users to transform PSI-MI XML2.5 interaction data files from IntAct into R graph objects. On these, they can use methods from R and Bioconductor for a variety of tasks: determining cohesive subgraphs, computing summary statistics, fitting mathematical models to the data or rendering graphical layouts. Rintact provides a programmatic interface to the IntAct repository and allows the use of the analytic methods provided by R and Bioconductor. AVAILABILITY: Rintact is freely available at http://bioconductor.org
Tony Chiang, Nianhua Li, Sandra E. Orchard, Samuel Kerrien, Henning Hermjakob, Robert Gentleman, Wolfgang Huber
Bioinform.3
2008 The Protein Feature Ontology: a tool for the unification of protein feature annotations
abstract
MOTIVATION: The advent of sequencing and structural genomics projects has provided a dramatic boost in the number of uncharacterized protein structures and sequences. Consequently, many computational tools have been developed to help elucidate protein function. However, such services are spread throughout the world, often with standalone web pages. Integration of these methods is needed and so far this has not been possible as there was no common vocabulary available that could be used as a standard language. RESULTS: The Protein Feature Ontology has been developed to provide a structured controlled vocabulary for features on a protein sequence or structure and comprises approximately 100 positional terms, now integrated into the Sequence Ontology (SO) and 40 non-positional terms which describe features relating to the whole-protein sequence. In addition, post-translational modifications are described by using a pre-existing ontology, the Protein Modification Ontology (MOD). This ontology is being used to integrate over 150 distinct annotations provided by the BioSapiens Network of Excellence, a consortium comprising 19 partner sites in Europe. AVAILABILITY: The Protein Feature Ontology can be browsed by accessing the ontology lookup service at the European Bioinformatics Institute (http://www.ebi.ac.uk/ontology-lookup/browse.do?ontName=BS).
Gabrielle A. Reeves, Karen Eilbeck, Michele Magrane, Claire O'Donovan, Luisa Montecchi-Palazzi, Midori A. Harris, Sandra E. Orchard, Rafael C. Jiménez, Andreas Prlic, Tim J. P. Hubbard, Henning Hermjakob, Janet M. Thornton
Bioinform.7