Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.

Johannes M. Van Spanje

dblp:39/5979 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 1990
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Performance modeling and evaluation · 67% Storage systems · 33%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Storage systems
database recovery
0.011990
Comparative Analysis of Different Models of Checkpointing and Recovery · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 1990
Performance modeling and evaluation › queueing models › markov chain model
markovian queueing model
0.011990
Comparative Analysis of Different Models of Checkpointing and Recovery · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 1990
Performance modeling and evaluation
queueing models
0.011990
Comparative Analysis of Different Models of Checkpointing and Recovery · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 1990

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

state-space analysis · 0.0simulation · 0.0markovian queueing model · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1990 Comparative Analysis of Different Models of Checkpointing and Recovery
abstract
Different checkpointing strategies are combined with recovery models of different refinement levels in the database systems. The complexity of the resulting model increases with its accuracy in representing a realistic system. Three different analytic approaches are used depending on the complexity of the model: analytic, numerical and simulation. A Markovian queuing model is developed, resulting in a combined Poisson and load-dependent checkpointing strategy with stochastic recovery. A state-space analysis approach is used to derive semianalytic expressions for the performance variables in terms of a set of unknown boundary state probabilities. An efficient numerical algorithm for evaluating unknown probabilities is outlined. The validity of the numerical solution is checked against simulation results and shown to be of acceptable accuracy, particularly in the stable operating range. Simulations have shown that realistic load-dependent checkpointing results in performance close to the optimal deterministic checkpointing. Furthermore, the stochastic recovery model is an accurate representation of a realistic recovery.>
Victor F. Nicola, Johannes M. Van Spanje
IEEE Trans. Software Eng.2