Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

B. R. Fox

dblp:39/6039 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
3as first author
0since 2021 · last 1987
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 3 first-authorSystems, architecture and hardware · 2 · 2 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Planning, search and constraint satisfaction · 68% Robot manipulation · 32%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction › scheduling
knowledge-based scheduling
0.011987
Reasoning about opportunistic schedules · ICRA 1987
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction
scheduling
0.011987
Reasoning about opportunistic schedules · ICRA 1987
Robotics › Robot manipulation
assembly
0.011985
Opportunistic scheduling for robotic assembly · ICRA 1985
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction › scheduling
task scheduling
0.011985
Opportunistic scheduling for robotic assembly · ICRA 1985

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

knowledge-based reasoning · 0.0opportunistic reasoning · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1987 Reasoning about opportunistic schedules
abstract
The scheduling of jobs and resources In a manufacturing environment is important because o f its basic impact on production costs, but is difficult because of the problems of combinatorial complexity and executwnal uncertainty. Scheduling suffers from combinatorial complexity because there are a very large number of schedules which can be generated f o r a set of jobs and resources, but there is no good way to choose between the options prior to execution. Scheduling is complicated by executional uncertainty in that unforeseeable events will almost certainly occur to disrupt any particular schedule once execution commences. This paper describes a novel approach to scheduling which overcomes these two difficulties. Implementation of the approach requires a new representation for schedules and techniques for knowledge-based reasoning about this representation. The issues involved in performing the knowledge-based reasoning are described and illustrated by examples drawn from the domain of robotic assembly.
B. R. Fox, Karl G. Kempf
ICRA1
1986 Planning, scheduling and uncertainty in the sequence of future events
B. R. Fox, Karl G. Kempf
UAI1
1985 Opportunistic scheduling for robotic assembly
abstract
Impressive strides have been made in dealing with the spatial complexity of robotic assembly tasks. Unfortunately, advances in dealing with temporal complexity have not kept pace. It is proposed that one reason for this deficiency is the unnecessary confounding of planning and scheduling. These two activities are differentiated on the basis of knowledge required/knowledge available at robot programming time. It is suggested that giving the robot the ability to reason opportunistically over knowledge of part availability at run time is a practical, efficient way to streamline assembly tasks. Initial experimental results are presented to substantiate this conclusion.
B. R. Fox, Karl G. Kempf
ICRA1