Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Alexander Kramnik

dblp:39/6387 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2005
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Data integration and cleaning · 91% Data mining · 9%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Data integration and cleaning
data integration system
0.112005
Integrating Data from Disparate Sources: A Mass Collaboration Approach · ICDE 2005
Data integration and cleaning › mediator systems
mediated schema
0.112005
Integrating Data from Disparate Sources: A Mass Collaboration Approach · ICDE 2005
Data integration and cleaning
schema matching
0.112005
Integrating Data from Disparate Sources: A Mass Collaboration Approach · ICDE 2005
Data mining › crowdsourcing
crowdsourced data
0.012005
Integrating Data from Disparate Sources: A Mass Collaboration Approach · ICDE 2005

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

user feedback learning · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2005 Integrating Data from Disparate Sources: A Mass Collaboration Approach
abstract
The rapid growth of distributed data at enterprises and on the WWW has fueled significant interest in building data integration systems. Such a system provides users with a uniform query interface (called mediated schema) to a multitude of data sources, thus freeing them from manually querying each individual source. To address some problems in the MOBS (Mass Collaboration to Build Systems) project at the University of Illinois, we develop solutions that learn from the multitude of users in the integration environment to improve the accuracy of integration tools. The improved accuracy in turn can significantly reduce the workload of the system builder. In developing MOBS we address the following key challenges: (i) obtaining user participation, (ii) learning from user participation, and (iii) combining user answers.
Robert McCann, Alexander Kramnik, Warren Shen, Vanitha Varadarajan, Olu Sobulo, AnHai Doan
ICDE2
2003 Building Data Integration Systems: A Mass Collaboration Approach
Robert McCann, AnHai Doan, Vanitha Varadarajan, Alexander Kramnik, ChengXiang Zhai
WebDB4