VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Guillaume Alain
dblp:39/7065
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2014
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 1 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
3 papers |
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 42% Deep learning architectures and training · 40% Generative modeling · 18% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% |
Topics — the 8 heaviest of 10, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
autoencoder |
0.2 | 1 | 2014 | What regularized auto-encoders learn from the data-generating distribution · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2014 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models › latent variable model › latent generative model
generative stochastic networks |
0.2 | 1 | 2014 | Deep Generative Stochastic Networks Trainable by Backprop · ICML 2014 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › monte carlo methods
markovian sampling |
0.2 | 1 | 2014 | Deep Generative Stochastic Networks Trainable by Backprop · ICML 2014 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › autoencoder
denoising autoencoder |
0.2 | 1 | 2013 | Generalized Denoising Auto-Encoders as Generative Models · NIPS 2013 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
cancer genomics |
0.1 | 1 | 2009 | Model-based clustering of array CGH data · Bioinform. 2009 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › cancer genomics › copy number analysis
copy number alteration analysis |
0.1 | 1 | 2009 | Model-based clustering of array CGH data · Bioinform. 2009 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › gene expression analysis
model-based clustering |
0.1 | 1 | 2009 | Model-based clustering of array CGH data · Bioinform. 2009 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › gene expression analysis › microarray data analysis
array CGH analysis |
0.0 | 1 | 2009 | Model-based clustering of array CGH data · Bioinform. 2009 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
theoretical analysis · 0.2markov chain monte carlo · 0.2denoising autoencoder · 0.2backpropagation · 0.2Metropolis-Hastings MCMC · 0.2Langevin MCMC · 0.2hidden markov model · 0.1expectation-maximization · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 | Deep Generative Stochastic Networks Trainable by BackpropabstractWe introduce a novel training principle for probabilistic models that is an alternative to maximum likelihood. The proposed Generative Stochastic Networks (GSN) framework is based on learning the transition operator of a Markov chain whose stationary distribution estimates the data distribution. Because the transition distribution is a conditional distribution generally involving a small move, it has fewer dominant modes, being unimodal in the limit of small moves. Thus, it is easier to learn, more like learning to perform supervised function approximation, with gradients that can be obtained by backprop. The theorems provided here generalize recent work on the probabilistic interpretation of denoising autoencoders and provide an interesting justification for dependency networks and generalized pseudolikelihood (along with defining an appropriate joint distribution and sampling mechanism, even when the conditionals are not consistent). GSNs can be used with missing inputs and can be used to sample subsets of variables given the rest. Successful experiments are conducted, validating these theoretical results, on two image datasets and with a particular architecture that mimics the Deep Boltzmann Machine Gibbs sampler but allows training to proceed with backprop, without the need for layerwise pretraining. Yoshua Bengio, Eric Thibodeau-Laufer, Guillaume Alain, Jason Yosinski |
ICML | 3 |
| 2014 | What regularized auto-encoders learn from the data-generating distribution
Guillaume Alain, Yoshua Bengio |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 1 |
| 2013 | Generalized Denoising Auto-Encoders as Generative ModelsabstractRecent work has shown how denoising and contractive autoencoders implicitly capture the structure of the data generating density, in the case where the corruption noise is Gaussian, the reconstruction error is the squared error, and the data is continuous-valued. This has led to various proposals for sampling from this implicitly learned density function, using Langevin and Metropolis-Hastings MCMC. However, it remained unclear how to connect the training procedure of regularized auto-encoders to the implicit estimation of the underlying data generating distribution when the data are discrete, or using other forms of corruption process and reconstruction errors. Another issue is the mathematical justification which is only valid in the limit of small corruption noise. We propose here a different attack on the problem, which deals with all these issues: arbitrary (but noisy enough) corruption, arbitrary reconstruction loss (seen as a log-likelihood), handling both discrete and continuous-valued variables, and removing the bias due to non-infinitesimal corruption noise (or non-infinitesimal contractive penalty). Yoshua Bengio, Guillaume Alain, Pascal Vincent |
NIPS | 3 |
| 2009 | Model-based clustering of array CGH dataabstractMOTIVATION: Analysis of array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) data for recurrent DNA copy number alterations from a cohort of patients can yield distinct sets of molecular signatures or profiles. This can be due to the presence of heterogeneous cancer subtypes within a supposedly homogeneous population. RESULTS: We propose a novel statistical method for automatically detecting such subtypes or clusters. Our approach is model based: each cluster is defined in terms of a sparse profile, which contains the locations of unusually frequent alterations. The profile is represented as a hidden Markov model. Samples are assigned to clusters based on their similarity to the cluster's profile. We simultaneously infer the cluster assignments and the cluster profiles using an expectation maximization-like algorithm. We show, using a realistic simulation study, that our method is significantly more accurate than standard clustering techniques. We then apply our method to two clinical datasets. In particular, we examine previously reported aCGH data from a cohort of 106 follicular lymphoma patients, and discover clusters that are known to correspond to clinically relevant subgroups. In addition, we examine a cohort of 92 diffuse large B-cell lymphoma patients, and discover previously unreported clusters of biological interest which have inspired followup clinical research on an independent cohort. AVAILABILITY: Software and synthetic datasets are available at http://www.cs.ubc.ca/ approximately sshah/acgh as part of the CNA-HMMer package. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online. Sohrab P. Shah, K-John Cheung Jr., Nathalie A. Johnson, Guillaume Alain, Randy D. Gascoyne, Douglas E. Horsman, Raymond T. Ng, Kevin Murphy 0002 |
Bioinform. | 4 |