Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Christopher M. De Vries

dblp:39/7184 · also Christopher Michael De Vries · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2015
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 3 · 2 first-authorArtificial intelligence and machine learning · 1Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
2 papers
Data mining · 90% Web and social media mining · 10%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Data mining › clustering
document clustering
0.322015
Parallel Streaming Signature EM-tree: A Clustering Algorithm for Web Scale Applications · WWW 2015
K-tree: large scale document clustering · SIGIR 2009
Data mining
clustering
0.212015
Parallel Streaming Signature EM-tree: A Clustering Algorithm for Web Scale Applications · WWW 2015
Data mining › clustering
hierarchical clustering
0.112009
K-tree: large scale document clustering · SIGIR 2009
Web and social media mining
web page analysis
0.112015
Parallel Streaming Signature EM-tree: A Clustering Algorithm for Web Scale Applications · WWW 2015

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

parallel streaming · 0.2compressed document representation · 0.2k-tree · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2015 Parallel Streaming Signature EM-tree: A Clustering Algorithm for Web Scale Applications
abstract
The proliferation of the web presents an unsolved problem of automatically analyzing billions of pages of natural language. We introduce a scalable algorithm that clusters hundreds of millions of web pages into hundreds of thousands of clusters. It does this on a single mid-range machine using efficient algorithms and compressed document representations. It is applied to two web-scale crawls covering tens of terabytes. ClueWeb09 and ClueWeb12 contain 500 and 733 million web pages and were clustered into 500,000 to 700,000 clusters. To the best of our knowledge, such fine grained clustering has not been previously demonstrated. Previous approaches clustered a sample that limits the maximum number of discoverable clusters. The proposed EM-tree algorithm uses the entire collection in clustering and produces several orders of magnitude more clusters than the existing algorithms. Fine grained clustering is necessary for meaningful clustering in massive collections where the number of distinct topics grows linearly with collection size. These fine-grained clusters show an improved cluster quality when assessed with two novel evaluations using ad hoc search relevance judgments and spam classifications for external validation. These evaluations solve the problem of assessing the quality of clusters where categorical labeling is unavailable and unfeasible.
Christopher M. De Vries, Lance De Vine, Shlomo Geva, Richi Nayak
WWW1
2011 TOPSIG: topology preserving document signatures
abstract
Comparisons between file signatures and inverted files for text retrieval have shown the shortcomings of traditional file signatures. It has been widely accepted that traditional file signatures are inferior alternatives to inverted files. This paper describes TopSig, a new approach to the construction of file signatures that extends recent advances in semantic hashing and dimensionality reduction. These were not so far linked to general purpose, signature file based, search engines. We demonstrate significant improvements in the performance of signature file based indexing and retrieval. Performance is comparable to the state of the art inverted file based systems, including language models and BM25. These findings suggest that file signatures offer a viable alternative to inverted files in suitable settings and positions the file signatures model in the class of Vector Space retrieval models.
Shlomo Geva, Christopher M. De Vries
CIKM2
2009 K-tree: large scale document clustering
abstract
We introduce K-tree in an information retrieval context. It is an efficient approximation of the k-means clustering algorithm. Unlike k-means it forms a hierarchy of clusters. It has been extended to address issues with sparse representations. We compare performance and quality to CLUTO using document collections. The K-tree has a low time complexity that is suitable for large document collections. This tree structure allows for efficient disk based implementations where space requirements exceed that of main memory.
Christopher M. De Vries, Shlomo Geva
SIGIR1