Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Craig W. Schmidt
dblp:39/8702
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Language models and text generation · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › tokenization
subword tokenization |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Tokenization Is More Than Compression · EMNLP 2024 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
tokenization |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Tokenization Is More Than Compression · EMNLP 2024 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › tokenization
tokenizer design |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Tokenization Is More Than Compression · EMNLP 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
byte-pair encoding · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Tokenization Is More Than CompressionabstractTokenization is a foundational step in natural language processing (NLP) tasks, bridging raw text and language models.Existing tokenization approaches like Byte-Pair Encoding (BPE) originate from the field of data compression, and it has been suggested that the effectiveness of BPE stems from its ability to condense text into a relatively small number of tokens.We test the hypothesis that fewer tokens lead to better downstream performance by introducing PathPiece, a new tokenizer that segments a document's text into the minimum number of tokens for a given vocabulary.Through extensive experimentation we find this hypothesis not to be the case, casting doubt on the understanding of the reasons for effective tokenization.To examine which other factors play a role, we evaluate design decisions across all three phases of tokenization: pre-tokenization, vocabulary construction, and segmentation, offering new insights into the design of effective tokenizers.Specifically, we illustrate the importance of pretokenization and the benefits of using BPE to initialize vocabulary construction.We train 64 language models with varying tokenization, ranging in size from 350M to 2.4B parameters, all of which are made publicly available. Craig W. Schmidt, Varshini Reddy, Alec Alameddine, Omri Uzan, Yuval Pinter, Chris Tanner |
EMNLP | 1 |