Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Ramadhana Bramandia

dblp:39/924 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
5ranked-venue papers
3as first author
0since 2021 · last 2012
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 5 · 3 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
5 papers
Graph data management · 41% Query processing and optimization · 29% Indexing and storage engines · 25%

Topics — the 8 heaviest of 10, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Graph data management
graph indexing
0.222010
Incremental Maintenance of 2-Hop Labeling of Large Graphs · IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2010
On incremental maintenance of 2-hop labeling of graphs · WWW 2008
Indexing and storage engines › index maintenance
incremental index maintenance
0.222010
Incremental Maintenance of 2-Hop Labeling of Large Graphs · IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2010
On incremental maintenance of 2-hop labeling of graphs · WWW 2008
Graph data management › graph query processing
reachability query
0.222010
Incremental Maintenance of 2-Hop Labeling of Large Graphs · IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2010
On incremental maintenance of 2-hop labeling of graphs · WWW 2008
Graph data management › graph indexing
2-hop labeling
0.112010
Incremental Maintenance of 2-Hop Labeling of Large Graphs · IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2010
Indexing and storage engines
i/o optimization
0.112010
Optimized query evaluation using cooperative sorts · ICDE 2010
Query processing and optimization
query execution
0.112010
Optimized query evaluation using cooperative sorts · ICDE 2010
Query processing and optimization
view maintenance
0.112009
Optimizing updates of recursive XML views of relations · VLDB J. 2009
Database system architecture and tuning › view management
XML views of relational data
0.012009
Optimizing updates of recursive XML views of relations · VLDB J. 2009

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

cooperative sorting · 0.12-hop labeling · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2012 Sort-sharing-aware query processing
Yu Cao 0004, Ramadhana Bramandia, Chee Yong Chan, Kian-Lee Tan
VLDB J.2
2010 Optimized query evaluation using cooperative sorts
abstract
Many applications require sorting a table over multiple sort orders: generation of multiple reports from a table, evaluation of a complex query that involves multiple instances of a relation, and batch processing of a set of queries. In this paper, we study how multiple sortings of a table can be efficiently performed. We introduce a new evaluation technique, called cooperative sort, that exploits the relationships among the input set of sort orders to minimize I/O operations for the collection of sort operations. To demonstrate the efficiency of the proposed scheme, we implemented it in PostgreSQL and evaluated its performance using both TPC-DS benchmark and synthetic data. Our experimental results show significant performance improvement over the traditional non-cooperative sorting scheme.
Yu Cao 0004, Ramadhana Bramandia, Chee Yong Chan, Kian-Lee Tan
ICDE2
2010 Incremental Maintenance of 2-Hop Labeling of Large Graphs
abstract
Recent interests on XML, the Semantic Web, and Web ontology, among other topics, have sparked a renewed interest on graph-structured databases. A fundamental query on graphs is the reachability test of nodes. Recently, 2-hop labeling has been proposed to index a large collection of XML and/or graphs for efficient reachability tests. However, there has been few work on updates of 2-hop labeling. This is compounded by the fact that data may often change over time. In response to these, this paper studies incremental maintenance of 2-hop labeling. We identify the main reason for the inefficiency of updates of existing 2-hop labels. We propose three updatable 2-hop labelings, hybrids of 2-hop labeling, and their incremental maintenance algorithms. The proposed 2-hop labeling is derived from graph connectivity, as opposed to set cover which is used by most previous works. Our experimental evaluation illustrates the space efficiency and update performance of various kinds of 2-hop labelings. Our results show that our incremental maintenance algorithm can be two orders of magnitude faster than previous methods and the size of our 2-hop labeling can be comparable to existing 2-hop labeling. We conclude that there is a natural way to spare some index size for update performance in 2-hop labeling.
Ramadhana Bramandia, Byron Choi, Wee Keong Ng
IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng.1
2009 Optimizing updates of recursive XML views of relations
Ramadhana Bramandia, Jiefeng Cheng, Byron Choi, Jeffrey Xu Yu
VLDB J.1
2008 On incremental maintenance of 2-hop labeling of graphs
abstract
Recent interests on XML, Semantic Web, and Web ontology, among other topics, have sparked a renewed interest on graph-structured databases. A fundamental query on graphs is the reachability test of nodes. Recently, 2-hop labeling has been proposed to index large collections of XML and/or graphs for efficient reachability tests. However, there has been few work on updates of 2-hop labeling. This is compounded by the fact that Web data changes over time. In response to these, this paper studies the incremental maintenance of 2-hop labeling. We identify the main reason for the inefficiency of updates of existing 2-hop labels. We propose two updatable 2-hop labelings, hybrids of 2-hop labeling, and their incremental maintenance algorithms. The proposed 2-hop labeling is derived from graph connectivities, as opposed to set cover which is used by all previous work. Our experimental evaluation illustrates the space efficiency and update performance of various kinds of 2-hop labeling. The main conclusion is that there is a natural way to spare some index size for update performance in 2-hop labeling.
Ramadhana Bramandia, Byron Choi, Wee Keong Ng
WWW1