Yizhen Liao

dblp:391/2777 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Generative modeling · 80% Motion planning and robot control · 20%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Generative modeling
diffusion model
0.912025
Training Free Guided Flow-Matching with Optimal Control · ICLR 2025
Machine learning › Generative modeling
flow matching
0.912025
Training Free Guided Flow-Matching with Optimal Control · ICLR 2025
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model › controllable generation
guided generation
0.912025
Training Free Guided Flow-Matching with Optimal Control · ICLR 2025
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot control
optimal control
0.912025
Training Free Guided Flow-Matching with Optimal Control · ICLR 2025
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model › guided diffusion
training-free guidance
0.912025
Training Free Guided Flow-Matching with Optimal Control · ICLR 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

optimal control theory · 0.9backpropagation through ODE · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Training Free Guided Flow-Matching with Optimal Control
abstract
Controlled generation with pre-trained Diffusion and Flow Matching models has vast applications. One strategy for guiding ODE-based generative models is through optimizing a target loss $R(x_1)$ while staying close to the prior distribution. Along this line, some recent work showed the effectiveness of guiding flow model by differentiating through its ODE sampling process. Despite the superior performance, the theoretical understanding of this line of methods is still preliminary, leaving space for algorithm improvement. Moreover, existing methods predominately focus on Euclidean data manifold, and there is a compelling need for guided flow methods on complex geometries such as SO(3), which prevails in high-stake scientific applications like protein design. We present OC-Flow, a general and theoretically grounded training-free framework for guided flow matching using optimal control. Building upon advances in optimal control theory, we develop effective and practical algorithms for solving optimal control in guided ODE-based generation and provide a systematic theoretical analysis of the convergence guarantee in both Euclidean and SO(3). We show that existing backprop-through-ODE methods can be interpreted as special cases of Euclidean OC-Flow. OC-Flow achieved superior performance in extensive experiments on text-guided image manipulation, conditional molecule generation, and all-atom peptide design.
Luran Wang, Chaoran Cheng, Yizhen Liao, Yanru Qu
ICLR3