Bohang Sun

dblp:391/3304 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
2as first author
4since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 2 first-author · 4 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
3 papers
Representation and self-supervised learning · 57% Learning paradigms · 26% Trustworthy machine learning · 13%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Data mining · 81% Machine learning and data management · 19%

Topics — the 14 heaviest of 15, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
contrastive learning
1.722025
AF-UMC: An Alignment-Free Fusion Framework for Unaligned Multi-View Clustering · NeurIPS 2025
CaliGCL: Calibrated Graph Contrastive Learning via Partitioned Similarity and Consistency Discrimination · NeurIPS 2025
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › contrastive learning
graph contrastive learning
0.912025
CaliGCL: Calibrated Graph Contrastive Learning via Partitioned Similarity and Consistency Discrimination · NeurIPS 2025
Machine learning › Learning paradigms
multi-label classification
0.912025
Addressing Multi-Label Learning with Partial Labels: From Sample Selection to Label Selection · AAAI 2025
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › multi-view learning
multi-view clustering
0.912025
AF-UMC: An Alignment-Free Fusion Framework for Unaligned Multi-View Clustering · NeurIPS 2025
Machine learning › Learning paradigms › weakly supervised learning
partial label learning
0.912025
Addressing Multi-Label Learning with Partial Labels: From Sample Selection to Label Selection · AAAI 2025
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
robustness
0.912025
Addressing Multi-Label Learning with Partial Labels: From Sample Selection to Label Selection · AAAI 2025
Data mining
clustering
0.912025
Graph Consistency and Diversity Measurement for Federated Multi-View Clustering · AAAI 2025
Machine learning and data management › privacy-preserving machine learning
federated learning
0.912025
Graph Consistency and Diversity Measurement for Federated Multi-View Clustering · AAAI 2025
Data mining › clustering › multi-view clustering
federated multi-view clustering
0.912025
Graph Consistency and Diversity Measurement for Federated Multi-View Clustering · AAAI 2025
Data mining › clustering
graph clustering
0.912025
Graph Consistency and Diversity Measurement for Federated Multi-View Clustering · AAAI 2025
Data mining › clustering
multi-view clustering
0.912025
Graph Consistency and Diversity Measurement for Federated Multi-View Clustering · AAAI 2025
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › neural network representation learning › deep representation learning
autoencoder representation learning
0.312025
AF-UMC: An Alignment-Free Fusion Framework for Unaligned Multi-View Clustering · NeurIPS 2025
Machine learning › Graph learning › limited supervision › multi-view semi-supervised learning
co-training
0.312025
Addressing Multi-Label Learning with Partial Labels: From Sample Selection to Label Selection · AAAI 2025
Data mining › clustering
spectral clustering
0.312025
Graph Consistency and Diversity Measurement for Federated Multi-View Clustering · AAAI 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

contrastive learning · 1.7structural clarity regularization · 0.9semantics-consistency discriminator · 0.9self-representation learning · 0.9sample selection · 0.9label selection · 0.9exponential partitioned similarity · 0.9dual autoencoder · 0.9co-training · 0.9autoencoder · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Addressing Multi-Label Learning with Partial Labels: From Sample Selection to Label Selection
abstract
Multi-label Learning with Partial Labels (ML-PL) learns from training data, where each sample is annotated with part of positive labels while leaving the rest of positive labels unannotated. Existing methods mainly focus on extending multi-label losses to estimate unannotated labels, further inducing a missing-robust network. However, training with single network could lead to confirmation bias (i.e., the model tends to confirm its mistakes). To tackle this issue, we propose a novel learning paradigm termed Co-Label Selection (CLS), where two networks feed forward all data and cooperate in a co-training manner for critical label selection. Different from traditional co-training based methods that networks select confident samples for each other, we start from a new perspective that two networks are encouraged to remove false-negative labels while keep training samples reserved. Meanwhile, considering the extreme positive-negative label imbalance in ML-PL that leads the model to focus on negative labels, we enforce the model to concentrate on positive labels by abandoning non-informative negative labels to alleviate such issue. By shifting the cooperation strategy from "Sample Selection'' to "Label Selection'', CLS avoids directly dropping samples and reserves training data in most extent, thus enhancing the utilization of supervised signals and the generalization of the learning model. Empirical results performed on various multi-label datasets demonstrate that our CLS is significantly superior to other state-of-the-art methods.
Gengyu Lyu, Bohang Sun, Songhe Feng
AAAI2
2025 Graph Consistency and Diversity Measurement for Federated Multi-View Clustering
abstract
Federated Multi-View Clustering (FMVC) aims to learn a global clustering model from heterogeneous data distributed across different devices, where each device only stores one view of all clustering samples. The key to deal with such problem lies in how to effectively fuse these heterogeneous samples while strictly preserve the data privacy across multiple devices. In this paper, we propose a novel structural graph learning framework named MGCD, which leverages both consistency and diversity of multi-view graph structure across global view-fusion server and local view-specific clients to achieve desired clustering while better preserves data privacy. Specifically, in each local client, we design a dual autoencoder to extract the latent consensuses and specificities of each view, where self-representation construction is introduced to generate the corresponding view-specific diversity graph. In the global server, the consistency implied in uploaded diversity graphs are further distilled and then incorporated into the consistency graph for subsequent cross-view contrastive fusion. During the training process, the server generates a global consistency graph and distributes it to each client for assisting in diversity graph construction, while the clients extract view-specific information and upload it to the server for more reliable consistency graph generation. The ``server-client'' interaction is conducted in an iterative manner, where the consistency implied in each local client is gradually aggregated into the global consistency graph, and the final clustering results are obtained by spectral clustering on the desired global consistency graph. Extensive experiments on various datasets have demonstrated the effectiveness of our proposed method on clustering federated multi-view data.
Bohang Sun, Yongjian Deng, Yuena Lin, Qiuru Hai, Zhen Yang 0004, Gengyu Lyu
AAAI1
2025 CaliGCL: Calibrated Graph Contrastive Learning via Partitioned Similarity and Consistency Discrimination
abstract
Graph contrastive learning (GCL) aims to learn self-supervised representations by distinguishing positive and negative sample pairs generated from multiple augmented graph views. Despite showing promising performance, GCL still suffers from two critical biases: (1) ***Similarity estimation bias*** arises when feature elements that support positive pair alignment are suppressed by conflicting components within the representation, causing truly positive pairs to appear less similar. (2) ***Semantic shift bias*** occurs when random augmentations alter the underlying semantics of samples, leading to incorrect positive or negative assignments and injecting noise into training. To address these issues, we propose CaliGCL, a GCL model for calibrating the biases by integrating an exponential partitioned similarity measure and a semantics-consistency discriminator. The exponential partitioned similarity computes the similarities among fine-grained partitions obtained through splitting representation vectors and uses exponential scaling to emphasize aligned (positive) partitions while reducing the influence of misaligned (negative) ones. The discriminator dynamically identifies whether augmented sample pairs maintain semantic consistency, enabling correction of misleading contrastive supervision signals. These components jointly reduce biases in similarity estimation and sample pairing, guiding the encoder to learn more robust and semantically meaningful representations. Extensive experiments on multiple benchmarks show that CaliGCL effectively mitigates both types of biases and achieves state-of-the-art performance.
Yuena Lin, Hao Wei 0006, Hai-Chun Cai, Bohang Sun, Zhen Yang 0004, Gengyu Lyu
NeurIPS4
2025 AF-UMC: An Alignment-Free Fusion Framework for Unaligned Multi-View Clustering
abstract
The Unaligned Multi-view Clustering (UMC) aims to learn a discriminative cluster structure from unaligned multi-view data, where the features of samples are not completely aligned across multiple views. Most existing methods usually prioritize employing various alignment strategies to align sample representations across views and then conduct cross-view fusion on aligned representations for subsequent clustering. However, ***due to the heterogeneity of representations across different views, these alignment strategies often fail to achieve ideal view-alignment results, inevitably leading to unreliable alignment-based fusion.*** To address this issue, we propose an alignment-free consistency fusion framework named AF-UMC, which bypasses the traditional view-alignment operation and directly extracts consistent representations from each view to perform global cross-view consistency fusion. Specifically, we first construct a cross-view consistent basis space by a cross-view reconstruction loss and a designed Structural Clarity Regularization (SCR), where autoencoders extract consistent representations from each view through projecting view-specific data to the constructed basis space. Afterwards, these extracted representations are globally pulled together for further cross-view fusion according to a designed Instance Global Contrastive Fusion (IGCF). Compared with previous methods, AF-UMC directly extracts consistent representations from each view for global fusion instead of alignment for fusion, which significantly mitigates the degraded fusion performance caused by undesired view-alignment results while greatly reducing algorithm complexity and enhancing its efficiency. Extensive experiments on various datasets demonstrate that our AF-UMC exhibits superior performance against other state-of-the-art methods.
Bohang Sun, Yuena Lin, Zhen Yang 0004, Gengyu Lyu
NeurIPS1